R. v. Jeffrey (M.K.), [2007] Nunavut Cases (CJ) 6

JudgeJohnson, J.
CourtNunavut Court of Justice (Canada)
Case DateFebruary 15, 2007
JurisdictionNunavut
Citations[2007] Nunavut Cases (CJ) 6;2007 NUCJ 6

R. v. Jeffrey (M.K.), [2007] Nunavut Cases (CJ) 6

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2007] Nunavut Cases TBEd. MY.355

Her Majesty the Queen (prosecutor) v. Mark King Jeffrey (accused)

(08-03-165; 2007 NUCJ 6)

Indexed As: R. v. Jeffrey (M.K.)

Nunavut Court of Justice

Iqaluit

Johnson, J.

February 15, 2007.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Editor's note: certain names in the following case have been initialized or the case otherwise edited to prevent the disclosure of identities where required by law, publication ban, Maritime Law Book's editorial policy or otherwise.

Civil Rights - Topic 1222

Security of the person - Lawful or reasonable search - Consent to search or seizure - See paragraphs 191 to 200.

Civil Rights - Topic 3160

Trials - Due process, fundamental justice and fair hearings - Criminal and quasi-criminal proceedings - Right to remain silent and protection against self-incrimination (Charter, s. 7) - See paragraphs 255 to 275 and 285 to 305.

Civil Rights - Topic 3604

Detention and imprisonment - Detention - What constitutes detention - See paragraphs 23 to 41, 140 to 148 and 201 to 220.

Civil Rights - Topic 4302

Protection against self-incrimination - General - Right to remain silent - See paragraphs 255 to 275 and 285 to 305.

Civil Rights - Topic 4604

Right to counsel - General - Denial of or interference with - What constitutes - See paragraphs 208 to 220.

Civil Rights - Topic 4608

Right to counsel - General - Right to be advised of - See paragraphs 208 to 220.

Civil Rights - Topic 4609.1

Right to counsel - General - Duty of police investigators (incl. undercover officers) - See paragraphs 208 to 220.

Criminal Law - Topic 5295.1

Evidence and witnesses - Admissibility of private communications - Admissible interceptions - Consent to interception - General - See paragraphs 191 to 200.

Criminal Law - Topic 5355

Evidence and witnesses - Confessions and voluntary statements - Whether statement was made freely and voluntarily - See paragraphs 104 to 139, 149 to 190, 221 to 254 and 276 to 283.

Evidence - Topic 1527

Hearsay rule - Hearsay rule exceptions and exclusions - General - Where admission of hearsay necessary and evidence reliable - See paragraphs 92 to 103.

Counsel:

Susanne Boucher and John Solski, for the prosecutor;

Sue Cooper and Michael Chandler, for the accused.

This action was heard on September 14-25 and December 11-18, 2006, by Johnson, J., of the Nunavut Court of Justice, who released the following judgment on February 15, 2007.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 practice notes
  • R. v. Jeffrey (M.K.), [2007] Nunavut Cases (CJ) 12
    • Canada
    • Nunavut Nunavut Court of Justice (Canada)
    • 15 Febrero 2007
    ...and full text Temp. Cite: [2007] Nunavut Cases TBEd. JN.299 Her Majesty the Queen (prosecutor) v. Mark King Jeffrey (accused) (08-03-165; 2007 NUCJ 6) Indexed As: R. v. Jeffrey Nunavut Court of Justice Iqaluit Johnson, J. February 15, 2007. Summary: This headnote contains no summary. Editor......
  • R. v. L.S., [2010] O.T.C. Uned. 5585 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 31 Enero 2008
    ...[39] There are case precedents when one statement is admissible as voluntary while others are not. (See, for example: R. v. Jeffrey , 2007 NUCJ 6, 74 W.C.B. (2d) 539.) I see no meaningful distinction between this case and the present situation. Part of a statement that is voluntary, and tha......
2 cases
  • R. v. Jeffrey (M.K.), [2007] Nunavut Cases (CJ) 12
    • Canada
    • Nunavut Nunavut Court of Justice (Canada)
    • 15 Febrero 2007
    ...and full text Temp. Cite: [2007] Nunavut Cases TBEd. JN.299 Her Majesty the Queen (prosecutor) v. Mark King Jeffrey (accused) (08-03-165; 2007 NUCJ 6) Indexed As: R. v. Jeffrey Nunavut Court of Justice Iqaluit Johnson, J. February 15, 2007. Summary: This headnote contains no summary. Editor......
  • R. v. L.S., [2010] O.T.C. Uned. 5585 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 31 Enero 2008
    ...[39] There are case precedents when one statement is admissible as voluntary while others are not. (See, for example: R. v. Jeffrey , 2007 NUCJ 6, 74 W.C.B. (2d) 539.) I see no meaningful distinction between this case and the present situation. Part of a statement that is voluntary, and tha......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT