R. v. Jim (G.), (2003) 185 B.C.A.C. 173 (CA)

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHuddart, Hall and Saunders, JJ.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
Citation(2003), 185 B.C.A.C. 173 (CA),2003 BCCA 411
Date19 June 2003

R. v. Jim (G.) (2003), 185 B.C.A.C. 173 (CA);

    303 W.A.C. 173

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2003] B.C.A.C. TBEd. JL.070

Regina (respondent) v. Glenn Jim (appellant)

(CA029896; 2003 BCCA 411)

Indexed As: R. v. Jim (G.)

British Columbia Court of Appeal

Huddart, Hall and Saunders, JJ.A.

July 16, 2003.

Summary:

The accused appealed his conviction by a jury for sexual assault.

The British Columbia Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and ordered a new trial.

Criminal Law - Topic 4953.1

Appeals - Indictable offences - New trials - Grounds - Conduct of counsel - Defence counsel failed to interview a potential witness whose evidence might have materially assisted the accused's alibi defence, and thus failed to assess its sig­nificance - The British Columbia Court of Appeal held that this was a significant omission which could have had a decisive impact on the jury's verdict - The court ordered a new trial.

Criminal Law - Topic 4964

Appeals - Indictable offences - New trials - Grounds - Competence of counsel - [See Criminal Law - Topic 4953.1 ].

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Strauss (D.W.) (1995), 61 B.C.A.C. 241; 100 W.A.C. 241; 100 C.C.C.(3d) 303 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 10].

R. v. G.D.B., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 520; 253 N.R. 201; 261 A.R. 1; 225 W.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 10].

R. v. McKellar (T.J.) (1994), 72 O.A.C. 398; 19 O.R.(3d) 796 (C.A.), consd. [para. 11].

R. v. Deneault (R.Y.) (1993), 33 B.C.A.C. 156; 54 W.A.C. 156 (C.A.), consd. [para. 11].

Counsel:

M.F. Allen, for the appellant;

M.J. DeWitt-Van Oosten, for the respon­dent.

This appeal was heard before Huddart, Hall and Saunders, JJ.A., of the British Columbia Court of Appeal, at Victoria, British Columbia, on June 19, 2003. The decision of the court was delivered at Vancouver, British Columbia, by Hall, J.A., July 16, 2003.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
12 practice notes
  • R. v. Dunbar, Pollard, Leiding and Kravit
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • December 9, 2003
    ...J.G.T. (2003), 178 B.C.A.C. 29; 292 W.A.C. 29; 2003 BCCA 1, refd to. [para. 23]. R. v. Jim (G.) (2003), 178 B.C.A.C. 29; 303 W.A.C. 29; 2003 BCCA 411, refd to. [para. 23]. R. v. Delisle (1999), 133 C.C.C.(3d) 541; 25 C.R.(5th) 198 (Que. C.A.), refd to. [para. 24]. R. v. Persad (K.) (2001), ......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Understanding Section 8: Search, Seizure, and the Canadian Constitution
    • June 17, 2005
    ...1....................................................................145, 149, 150, 245– 46 R. v. Jamieson (2002), 166 C.C.C. (3d) 501, 2003 BCCA 411 ................................ 109 R. v. Janda, [2003] O.J. No. 326 (S.C.J.).....................................................................
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Ethics and Criminal Law. Second Edition
    • June 19, 2015
    ...371, 372 R v JHS, 2008 SCC 30 ........................................................................................... 24 R v Jim, 2003 BCCA 411 ..................................................................................... 375 R v Joanisse (1995), 102 CCC (3d) 35, 44 CR (4th) 364......
  • Witnesses
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Ethics and Criminal Law. Second Edition
    • June 19, 2015
    ...CA) [ Delisle ], R v McKellar (1994), 34 CR (4th) 28 (Ont CA); R v Michelin , [1999] OJ No 848 at paras 35–38 and 42 (Gen Div); R v Jim, 2003 BCCA 411 at paras 8–9 and 13; R v Giroux , [2004] OJ No 2054 at paras 1–2 (CA) [ Giroux ]; R v McKoy , 2011 ONCA 41 at paras 4–5; R v Fraser , 2011 N......
  • Get Started for Free
9 cases
  • R. v. Dunbar, Pollard, Leiding and Kravit
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • December 9, 2003
    ...J.G.T. (2003), 178 B.C.A.C. 29; 292 W.A.C. 29; 2003 BCCA 1, refd to. [para. 23]. R. v. Jim (G.) (2003), 178 B.C.A.C. 29; 303 W.A.C. 29; 2003 BCCA 411, refd to. [para. 23]. R. v. Delisle (1999), 133 C.C.C.(3d) 541; 25 C.R.(5th) 198 (Que. C.A.), refd to. [para. 24]. R. v. Persad (K.) (2001), ......
  • R. v. Chan (C.C.(R.)) et al.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • September 23, 2003
    ...93]. R. v. Strauss (D.W.) (1995), 61 B.C.A.C. 241; 100 W.A.C. 241; 100 C.C.C.(3d) 303 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 93]. R. v. Jim (G.) (2003), 185 B.C.A.C. 173; 303 W.A.C. 173 (C.A.), dist. [para. A.F. Brooks, for the appellant, Chi Cheong Chan; P. Leask, Q.C., and J. Gellis, for the appellant, ......
  • R. v. Smith (S.A.), 2007 SKCA 71
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • June 20, 2007
    ...56 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 6]. R. v. Edwards (C.) (1996), 192 N.R. 81; 88 O.A.C. 321 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Jim (G.) (2003), 185 B.C.A.C. 173; 303 W.A.C. 173 (C.A.), refd to. [para. R. v. Joanisse (R.) (1995), 85 O.A.C. 186 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 25]. R. v. Deneault (R.Y.) (1......
  • R. v. Huber (E.E.)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • September 22, 2003
    ...152]. R. v. Dunbar (A.A.) et al. (2003), 191 B.C.A.C. 223; 314 W.A.C. 223; 2003 BCCA 667, refd to. [para. 153]. R. v. Jim (G.) (2003), 185 B.C.A.C. 173; 303 W.A.C. 173; 2003 BCCA 411 (C.A.), refd to. [para. R. v. A.R.B., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 781; 255 N.R. 201; 135 O.A.C. 144; 146 C.C.C.(3d) 191;......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Ethics and Criminal Law. Second Edition
    • June 19, 2015
    ...371, 372 R v JHS, 2008 SCC 30 ........................................................................................... 24 R v Jim, 2003 BCCA 411 ..................................................................................... 375 R v Joanisse (1995), 102 CCC (3d) 35, 44 CR (4th) 364......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Understanding Section 8: Search, Seizure, and the Canadian Constitution
    • June 17, 2005
    ...1....................................................................145, 149, 150, 245– 46 R. v. Jamieson (2002), 166 C.C.C. (3d) 501, 2003 BCCA 411 ................................ 109 R. v. Janda, [2003] O.J. No. 326 (S.C.J.).....................................................................
  • Witnesses
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Ethics and Criminal Law. Second Edition
    • June 19, 2015
    ...CA) [ Delisle ], R v McKellar (1994), 34 CR (4th) 28 (Ont CA); R v Michelin , [1999] OJ No 848 at paras 35–38 and 42 (Gen Div); R v Jim, 2003 BCCA 411 at paras 8–9 and 13; R v Giroux , [2004] OJ No 2054 at paras 1–2 (CA) [ Giroux ]; R v McKoy , 2011 ONCA 41 at paras 4–5; R v Fraser , 2011 N......