R. v. Jim (G.), (2003) 185 B.C.A.C. 173 (CA)
| Judge | Huddart, Hall and Saunders, JJ.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Case Date | June 19, 2003 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | (2003), 185 B.C.A.C. 173 (CA);2003 BCCA 411 |
R. v. Jim (G.) (2003), 185 B.C.A.C. 173 (CA);
303 W.A.C. 173
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2003] B.C.A.C. TBEd. JL.070
Regina (respondent) v. Glenn Jim (appellant)
(CA029896; 2003 BCCA 411)
Indexed As: R. v. Jim (G.)
British Columbia Court of Appeal
Huddart, Hall and Saunders, JJ.A.
July 16, 2003.
Summary:
The accused appealed his conviction by a jury for sexual assault.
The British Columbia Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and ordered a new trial.
Criminal Law - Topic 4953.1
Appeals - Indictable offences - New trials - Grounds - Conduct of counsel - Defence counsel failed to interview a potential witness whose evidence might have materially assisted the accused's alibi defence, and thus failed to assess its significance - The British Columbia Court of Appeal held that this was a significant omission which could have had a decisive impact on the jury's verdict - The court ordered a new trial.
Criminal Law - Topic 4964
Appeals - Indictable offences - New trials - Grounds - Competence of counsel - [See Criminal Law - Topic 4953.1 ].
Cases Noticed:
R. v. Strauss (D.W.) (1995), 61 B.C.A.C. 241; 100 W.A.C. 241; 100 C.C.C.(3d) 303 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 10].
R. v. G.D.B., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 520; 253 N.R. 201; 261 A.R. 1; 225 W.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 10].
R. v. McKellar (T.J.) (1994), 72 O.A.C. 398; 19 O.R.(3d) 796 (C.A.), consd. [para. 11].
R. v. Deneault (R.Y.) (1993), 33 B.C.A.C. 156; 54 W.A.C. 156 (C.A.), consd. [para. 11].
Counsel:
M.F. Allen, for the appellant;
M.J. DeWitt-Van Oosten, for the respondent.
This appeal was heard before Huddart, Hall and Saunders, JJ.A., of the British Columbia Court of Appeal, at Victoria, British Columbia, on June 19, 2003. The decision of the court was delivered at Vancouver, British Columbia, by Hall, J.A., July 16, 2003.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
R. v. Dunbar, Pollard, Leiding and Kravit,
...J.G.T. (2003), 178 B.C.A.C. 29; 292 W.A.C. 29; 2003 BCCA 1, refd to. [para. 23]. R. v. Jim (G.) (2003), 178 B.C.A.C. 29; 303 W.A.C. 29; 2003 BCCA 411, refd to. [para. 23]. R. v. Delisle (1999), 133 C.C.C.(3d) 541; 25 C.R.(5th) 198 (Que. C.A.), refd to. [para. 24]. R. v. Persad (K.) (2001), ......
-
Table of cases
...371, 372 R v JHS, 2008 SCC 30 ........................................................................................... 24 R v Jim, 2003 BCCA 411 ..................................................................................... 375 R v Joanisse (1995), 102 CCC (3d) 35, 44 CR (4th) 364......
-
Table of Cases
...1....................................................................145, 149, 150, 245– 46 R. v. Jamieson (2002), 166 C.C.C. (3d) 501, 2003 BCCA 411 ................................ 109 R. v. Janda, [2003] O.J. No. 326 (S.C.J.).....................................................................
-
Witnesses
...CA) [ Delisle ], R v McKellar (1994), 34 CR (4th) 28 (Ont CA); R v Michelin , [1999] OJ No 848 at paras 35–38 and 42 (Gen Div); R v Jim, 2003 BCCA 411 at paras 8–9 and 13; R v Giroux , [2004] OJ No 2054 at paras 1–2 (CA) [ Giroux ]; R v McKoy , 2011 ONCA 41 at paras 4–5; R v Fraser , 2011 N......
-
R. v. Dunbar, Pollard, Leiding and Kravit,
...J.G.T. (2003), 178 B.C.A.C. 29; 292 W.A.C. 29; 2003 BCCA 1, refd to. [para. 23]. R. v. Jim (G.) (2003), 178 B.C.A.C. 29; 303 W.A.C. 29; 2003 BCCA 411, refd to. [para. 23]. R. v. Delisle (1999), 133 C.C.C.(3d) 541; 25 C.R.(5th) 198 (Que. C.A.), refd to. [para. 24]. R. v. Persad (K.) (2001), ......
-
R. v. Smith (S.A.), 2007 SKCA 71
...56 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 6]. R. v. Edwards (C.) (1996), 192 N.R. 81; 88 O.A.C. 321 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Jim (G.) (2003), 185 B.C.A.C. 173; 303 W.A.C. 173 (C.A.), refd to. [para. R. v. Joanisse (R.) (1995), 85 O.A.C. 186 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 25]. R. v. Deneault (R.Y.) (1......
-
R. v. Chan (C.C.(R.)) et al., (2003) 187 B.C.A.C. 214 (CA)
...93]. R. v. Strauss (D.W.) (1995), 61 B.C.A.C. 241; 100 W.A.C. 241; 100 C.C.C.(3d) 303 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 93]. R. v. Jim (G.) (2003), 185 B.C.A.C. 173; 303 W.A.C. 173 (C.A.), dist. [para. A.F. Brooks, for the appellant, Chi Cheong Chan; P. Leask, Q.C., and J. Gellis, for the appellant, ......
-
R. v. Huber (E.E.), 2004 BCCA 43
...152]. R. v. Dunbar (A.A.) et al. (2003), 191 B.C.A.C. 223; 314 W.A.C. 223; 2003 BCCA 667, refd to. [para. 153]. R. v. Jim (G.) (2003), 185 B.C.A.C. 173; 303 W.A.C. 173; 2003 BCCA 411 (C.A.), refd to. [para. R. v. A.R.B., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 781; 255 N.R. 201; 135 O.A.C. 144; 146 C.C.C.(3d) 191;......
-
Table of cases
...371, 372 R v JHS, 2008 SCC 30 ........................................................................................... 24 R v Jim, 2003 BCCA 411 ..................................................................................... 375 R v Joanisse (1995), 102 CCC (3d) 35, 44 CR (4th) 364......
-
Table of Cases
...1....................................................................145, 149, 150, 245– 46 R. v. Jamieson (2002), 166 C.C.C. (3d) 501, 2003 BCCA 411 ................................ 109 R. v. Janda, [2003] O.J. No. 326 (S.C.J.).....................................................................
-
Witnesses
...CA) [ Delisle ], R v McKellar (1994), 34 CR (4th) 28 (Ont CA); R v Michelin , [1999] OJ No 848 at paras 35–38 and 42 (Gen Div); R v Jim, 2003 BCCA 411 at paras 8–9 and 13; R v Giroux , [2004] OJ No 2054 at paras 1–2 (CA) [ Giroux ]; R v McKoy , 2011 ONCA 41 at paras 4–5; R v Fraser , 2011 N......