R v Johnson, 2018 SKCA 28
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Herauf, Ryan-Froslie and Schwann JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2018 SKCA 28 |
| Docket Number | CACR2910 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Date | 12 April 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Digest: R v Johnson, 2018 SKCA 28
...as: 2018 SKCA 28 Docket Number: CA17139 , CACR 2910 Court: Court of Appeal Date: 2018-04-12 Judges: Herauf Ryan-Froslie Schwann Subjects: Criminal Law � Evidence � Admissibility � Hearsay Criminal Law � Assault � Aggravated Assault � Conviction � Appeal Criminal Law � Assault � Aggravated A......
-
R v Williams, 2020 SKCA 108
...MacLeod, 2018 SKCA 1, [2018] 5 WWR 743 · over-emphasis on parity with co-accused in different circumstances (at paras 34–35) R v Johnson, 2018 SKCA 28, [2018] 6 WWR 725 · improperly conflating the consecutive–concurrent analysis and the totality analysis (at para 70) R v Chicoine, 2019 SKCA......
-
R v T.F., 2019 SKCA 82
...has an impact on the sentence imposed (see also R v Kaiswatum, 2019 SKCA 7, [2019] 5 WWR 669; R v Lemaigre, 2018 SKCA 47; R v Johnson, 2018 SKCA 28, [2018] 6 WWR 725; R v L.V., 2016 SKCA 74, [2017] 1 WWR 439 [20] If interference with the sentence is justified on either basis, the appellate ......
-
R v Weldekidan, 2019 MBCA 109
...several months after the events and 12 years prior to the trial where the witness identified the accused from a photo array); R v Johnson, 2018 SKCA 28 (KGB requirements were not met as the oath and warning were given after the statement was taken, the witness had possible motives to lie an......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
R v Williams, 2020 SKCA 108
...MacLeod, 2018 SKCA 1, [2018] 5 WWR 743 · over-emphasis on parity with co-accused in different circumstances (at paras 34–35) R v Johnson, 2018 SKCA 28, [2018] 6 WWR 725 · improperly conflating the consecutive–concurrent analysis and the totality analysis (at para 70) R v Chicoine, 2019 SKCA......
-
R v T.F., 2019 SKCA 82
...has an impact on the sentence imposed (see also R v Kaiswatum, 2019 SKCA 7, [2019] 5 WWR 669; R v Lemaigre, 2018 SKCA 47; R v Johnson, 2018 SKCA 28, [2018] 6 WWR 725; R v L.V., 2016 SKCA 74, [2017] 1 WWR 439 [20] If interference with the sentence is justified on either basis, the appellate ......
-
R v Weldekidan, 2019 MBCA 109
...several months after the events and 12 years prior to the trial where the witness identified the accused from a photo array); R v Johnson, 2018 SKCA 28 (KGB requirements were not met as the oath and warning were given after the statement was taken, the witness had possible motives to lie an......
-
R. v. Smith, 2018 SKQB 347
...Saskatchewan Court of Appeal recently commented upon the “rationale for inadmissibility” regarding hearsay in R v Johnson, 2018 SKCA 28, [2018] 6 WWR [33] As a general rule, hearsay evidence is inadmissible. The rationale for its inadmissibility was recently explai......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Digest: R v Johnson, 2018 SKCA 28
...as: 2018 SKCA 28 Docket Number: CA17139 , CACR 2910 Court: Court of Appeal Date: 2018-04-12 Judges: Herauf Ryan-Froslie Schwann Subjects: Criminal Law � Evidence � Admissibility � Hearsay Criminal Law � Assault � Aggravated Assault � Conviction � Appeal Criminal Law � Assault � Aggravated A......