R v Jovel, 2019 MBCA 116
Judge | Madam Justice Freda M. Steel; Madam Justice Holly C. Beard; Mr. Justice Christopher J. Mainella |
Court | Court of Appeal (Manitoba) |
Case Date | November 21, 2019 |
Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
Citations | 2019 MBCA 116 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
25 practice notes
-
R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37
...despite obvious frailties, can be a sign of uncritical analysis by a trial judge that justifies appellate interference: R v Jovel, 2019 MBCA 116 at para 43, citing R v Burke, [1996] 1 SCR 474 at para 53 4. The principles applied [35] In my view, the trial judge’s decision, when read as a wh......
-
R. v. Percy, 2020 NSCA 11
...the general principles of law with respect to misapprehension of evidence were recently reviewed by Mainella J.A. in R. v. Jovel, 2019 MBCA 116, which I would respectfully adopt: 34 In R v Whiteway (BDT) et al, 2015 MBCA 24, the following summary was provided as to what is, and what is not,......
-
R v Peters, 2020 MBCA 17
...second ground, it is long established that a trial judge’s credibility determinations are subject to great deference. [6] In R v Jovel, 2019 MBCA 116, Mainella JA observed (at para In considering whether a verdict is unreasonable, the appellate court must re-examine and, to some extent at l......
-
R v Singh et al, 2020 MBCA 61
...of a Crown witness is an error of law that undermines the fairness of the trial and can lead to a miscarriage of justice (see R v Jovel, 2019 MBCA 116; see also R v Owen, 2001 CarswellOnt 3852 at para 3 [32] However, this is a difficult argument to make as the accused must meet the threshol......
Request a trial to view additional results
25 cases
-
R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37
...despite obvious frailties, can be a sign of uncritical analysis by a trial judge that justifies appellate interference: R v Jovel, 2019 MBCA 116 at para 43, citing R v Burke, [1996] 1 SCR 474 at para 53 4. The principles applied [35] In my view, the trial judge’s decision, when read as a wh......
-
R. v. Percy, 2020 NSCA 11
...the general principles of law with respect to misapprehension of evidence were recently reviewed by Mainella J.A. in R. v. Jovel, 2019 MBCA 116, which I would respectfully adopt: 34 In R v Whiteway (BDT) et al, 2015 MBCA 24, the following summary was provided as to what is, and what is not,......
-
R v Peters, 2020 MBCA 17
...second ground, it is long established that a trial judge’s credibility determinations are subject to great deference. [6] In R v Jovel, 2019 MBCA 116, Mainella JA observed (at para In considering whether a verdict is unreasonable, the appellate court must re-examine and, to some extent at l......
-
R v Dowd,
...a trier of fact can use their common sense to decide whether they accept some, all or none of a witness’s evidence (see R v Jovel, 2019 MBCA 116 at paras 27-28). Juries are routinely given such instructions. [36] ......
Request a trial to view additional results