R. v. K.J.M., 2019 SCC 55

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeWagner, Richard; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah
Citation2019 SCC 55
Date15 November 2019
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Docket Number38292
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
79 practice notes
  • R. v. K.G.K., 2020 SCC 7
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • March 20, 2020
    ...2016 SCC 27, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 631; R. v. Rahey, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 588; R. v. MacDougall, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 45; referred to: R. v. K.J.M., 2019 SCC 55; R. v. Morin, [1992] 1 S.C.R. 771; R. v. Godin, 2009 SCC 26, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 3; R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609; R. v. Cody, 2017 SC......
  • R. v. J.F., 2022 SCC 17
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 6, 2022
    ...Cited By Wagner C.J. Applied: R. v. Jordan, 2016 SCC 27, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 631; considered: R. v. Morin, [1992] 1 S.C.R. 771; R. v. K.J.M., 2019 SCC 55, [2019] 4 S.C.R. 39; R. v. Potvin, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 880; R. v. Rabba (1991), 64 C.C.C. (3d) 445; R. v. Collins, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 1104; referred......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 10 – February 14, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • April 8, 2020
    ...Youth Criminal Justice Act, S.C. 2002, c. 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 11(b), R. v. Jordan, 2016 SCC 27, R. v. K.J.M., 2019 SCC 55 Ontario Review Board Decisions J (Re), 2020 ONCA 113 Keywords: Ontario Review Board, Appeals, Mootness M (Re), 2020 ONCA 105 Keywords: Ontario......
  • Calculating the Total Delay Period
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books A Proactive Practitioner's Guide to Section 11(b) of the Charter
    • May 29, 2024
    ...v Technical Standards and Safety Authority (TSSA) , 2022 ONCJ 129 at para 31; R v Nguyen , 2020 ONCA 609 at paras 22–26; R v KJM , 2019 SCC 55 at para 65 [ KJM (SCC)]; R v Sangha , 2022 BCSC 874 at para 57. 5 R v Zapata-Valles AA (Corporal), 2022 CM 3011 at para 76. 6 Jordan , above note 1 ......
  • Get Started for Free
56 cases
  • R. v. J.F., 2022 SCC 17
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 6, 2022
    ...Cited By Wagner C.J. Applied: R. v. Jordan, 2016 SCC 27, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 631; considered: R. v. Morin, [1992] 1 S.C.R. 771; R. v. K.J.M., 2019 SCC 55, [2019] 4 S.C.R. 39; R. v. Potvin, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 880; R. v. Rabba (1991), 64 C.C.C. (3d) 445; R. v. Collins, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 1104; referred......
  • R. v. K.G.K., 2020 SCC 7
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • March 20, 2020
    ...2016 SCC 27, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 631; R. v. Rahey, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 588; R. v. MacDougall, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 45; referred to: R. v. K.J.M., 2019 SCC 55; R. v. Morin, [1992] 1 S.C.R. 771; R. v. Godin, 2009 SCC 26, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 3; R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609; R. v. Cody, 2017 SC......
  • R. v. Lai, 2021 BCCA 105
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • March 9, 2021
    ...these considerations can inform whether any excess delay may be justified as reasonable (Jordan, at para. 96). [125] In R. v. K.J.M., 2019 SCC 55, the Court considered whether the Jordan ceiling or another, lower ceiling ought to be applied in cases involving young offenders. While its anal......
  • R. v. S.C., 2022 ONCJ 486
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • October 25, 2022
    ...show that the delay is unreasonable (Jordan, para. 48).   [2] R. v. Kalanj, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1594 at para. 19. [3] R. v. K.J.M., 2019 SCC 55, [2019] 4 S.C.R. 39; R. v. Hunt, 2017 SCC 25, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 476; R. v. Coulter, 2016 ONCA 704; [2016] O.J. No. [4] The trial did not finish......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 10 – February 14, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • April 8, 2020
    ...Youth Criminal Justice Act, S.C. 2002, c. 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 11(b), R. v. Jordan, 2016 SCC 27, R. v. K.J.M., 2019 SCC 55 Ontario Review Board Decisions J (Re), 2020 ONCA 113 Keywords: Ontario Review Board, Appeals, Mootness M (Re), 2020 ONCA 105 Keywords: Ontario......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 28 ' October 2, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 6, 2020
    ...to Take Steps to Expedite Trial, Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s.11(b), Highway Traffic Act, R v Jordan, 2016 SCC 27, R v KJM, 2019 SCC 55 R v Hosannah, 2020 ONCA 617 Keywords: Manslaughter, Failure to Provide Necessities of Life, Criminal Procedure, Appeals, Fresh Evidence, Expert Medica......
19 books & journal articles
  • Calculating the Total Delay Period
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books A Proactive Practitioner's Guide to Section 11(b) of the Charter
    • May 29, 2024
    ...v Technical Standards and Safety Authority (TSSA) , 2022 ONCJ 129 at para 31; R v Nguyen , 2020 ONCA 609 at paras 22–26; R v KJM , 2019 SCC 55 at para 65 [ KJM (SCC)]; R v Sangha , 2022 BCSC 874 at para 57. 5 R v Zapata-Valles AA (Corporal), 2022 CM 3011 at para 76. 6 Jordan , above note 1 ......
  • Where Delay Exceeds the Ceiling - Exceptional Circumstances
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books A Proactive Practitioner's Guide to Section 11(b) of the Charter
    • May 29, 2024
    ...concerns itself with what 23 R v Gordon , 2017 ONCA 436 at paras 10–14. 24 R v KC , 2022 ONCA 738 at paras 63–74 [ KC ]. 25 R v KJM , 2019 SCC 55 at paras 5 and 20. 26 R v Jerace , 2018 ABCA 152 at para 29. 27 R v Mavros , 2020 ABCA 436 at paras 22–30. 28 R v Boehmer , 2019 SKCA 74 at paras......
  • Rights in the Criminal Process
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Seventh Edition
    • June 30, 2021
    ...the Crown proceeded jointly against several accused, and the delay was caused by the co-accused. 159 R v KGK, 2020 SCC 7. 160 R v KJM, 2019 SCC 55. 161 R v Mills, [1986] 1 SCR 863, 29 DLR (4th) 161; R v Carter, [1986] 1 SCR 981, 26 CCC (3d) 572. 162 R v Kalanj, [1989] 1 SCR 1594, 48 CCC (3d......
  • Preliminary Matters and Remedies
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Procedure. Fourth Edition
    • June 23, 2020
    ...a fifteen-month ceiling should apply in youth cases, but the majority (for two different sets of reasons) did not agree. 111 R v KJM , 2019 SCC 55 at para 74. 112 York (Regional Municipality) v Tomovski 2017 ONCJ 785. 113 Kalanj , above note 22 at para 11. In Kalanj the accused was arrested......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT