R. v. K.J.C., 2020 NSCA 5

JurisdictionNova Scotia
JudgeHonourable Justice Anne S. Derrick
Citation2020 NSCA 5
Date08 January 2021
CourtCourt of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
Docket NumberCAC 491459
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
12 practice notes
  • R v Joyce,
    • Canada
    • August 3, 2022
    ...Assuming that cocaine-trafficking cases are valid parity comparators, the court must apply R v Livingstone; R v Lungal; R v Terris, 2020 NSCA 5 [Livingstone, Lungal, Terris]. In that decision, the Court was dealing with three persons who had received suspended sentences for Schedule I-traff......
  • R v Sharifi-Jamali,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 20, 2022
    ...added). 4.     R. v. Livingstone et al [58]        In R v Livingstone et al, 2020 NSCA 5, the original sentencing judge imposes a suspended sentence and a three-year probation period on 3 years, in three unrelated cases, one of which (M......
  • R. v. Dawson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • March 17, 2021
    ...Appeal. With respect to the latter, I am especially mindful of Justice Farrar’s comments in R. v. Livingston; R. v. Lungal; R. v. Terris, 2020 NSCA 5 at paras. 57 and [43] Whereas on the first count Mr. Ross’ (then) employment with DND means he was in a trust position as opposed to his co-o......
  • R. v. Ellis,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • August 16, 2022
    ...R. v. Knudsen, 2019 BCPC 198; and R. v. Dewat, 2019 BCPC 183. This is not an exhaustive list. [122]    In R. v. Livingston, 2020 NSCA 5, it was noted in the Nova Scotia context that suspended sentences in trafficking cases, when imposed, generally reflect a finding that: (a) ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
12 cases
  • R v Joyce,
    • Canada
    • August 3, 2022
    ...Assuming that cocaine-trafficking cases are valid parity comparators, the court must apply R v Livingstone; R v Lungal; R v Terris, 2020 NSCA 5 [Livingstone, Lungal, Terris]. In that decision, the Court was dealing with three persons who had received suspended sentences for Schedule I-traff......
  • R v Sharifi-Jamali,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 20, 2022
    ...added). 4.     R. v. Livingstone et al [58]        In R v Livingstone et al, 2020 NSCA 5, the original sentencing judge imposes a suspended sentence and a three-year probation period on 3 years, in three unrelated cases, one of which (M......
  • R. v. Dawson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • March 17, 2021
    ...Appeal. With respect to the latter, I am especially mindful of Justice Farrar’s comments in R. v. Livingston; R. v. Lungal; R. v. Terris, 2020 NSCA 5 at paras. 57 and [43] Whereas on the first count Mr. Ross’ (then) employment with DND means he was in a trust position as opposed to his co-o......
  • R. v. Hickey,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • February 1, 2023
    ...[54]         More recently, in R. v. Livingstone; R. v. Lungal; R. v. Terris, 2020 NSCA 5, the court said the following for ranges of sentences for Schedule I [8]  The range of sentence in Nova Scotia for Schedule I trafficking offences is typica......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT