R. v. K.S., 2020 ONCJ 328
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Justice B. Weagant |
| Citation | 2020 ONCJ 328 |
| Docket Number | 19-Y190647 |
| Court | Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada) |
| Date | 20 July 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
R. v. A.R.,
...5040, at paras. 8-11. Accordingly, some of the cases relied upon by the respondents such as R. v. Brown, 2021 ONCJ 123 and R. v. K.S., 2020 ONCJ 328, which concern s. 714.1, are of limited [12] Mr. Ryan submits that granting the ap......
-
R. v. Vann,
...of innocence and undermining his right to a fair trial [16] She argues, citing R. v. K.S., 2020 ONCJ 328 at para 55, that interactions in virtual space disconnect people from the court setting and risk diluting the accountability of witnesses which ......
-
R. v. K.Z.,
...and compelling circumstances” test for the testimony of complainants has been applied in Ontario – R v KS, 2020 ONCJ 328.[2] However, courts in this province have generally declined to follow that approach – R v McDougal, [2021] OJ No 754 (SCJ) at para 3, R v Metc......
-
R v Barry,
...cross-examinations. [24] In addition, they rely on the Ontario case R v KS, 2020 ONCJ 328, where the Court expressed skepticism with virtual appearances and stated that s 714.1 only allowed for limited exceptions to the usual in-pe......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
R. v. A.R.,
...5040, at paras. 8-11. Accordingly, some of the cases relied upon by the respondents such as R. v. Brown, 2021 ONCJ 123 and R. v. K.S., 2020 ONCJ 328, which concern s. 714.1, are of limited [12] Mr. Ryan submits that granting the ap......
-
R. v. Vann,
...of innocence and undermining his right to a fair trial [16] She argues, citing R. v. K.S., 2020 ONCJ 328 at para 55, that interactions in virtual space disconnect people from the court setting and risk diluting the accountability of witnesses which ......
-
R. v. K.Z.,
...and compelling circumstances” test for the testimony of complainants has been applied in Ontario – R v KS, 2020 ONCJ 328.[2] However, courts in this province have generally declined to follow that approach – R v McDougal, [2021] OJ No 754 (SCJ) at para 3, R v Metc......
-
R v Barry,
...cross-examinations. [24] In addition, they rely on the Ontario case R v KS, 2020 ONCJ 328, where the Court expressed skepticism with virtual appearances and stated that s 714.1 only allowed for limited exceptions to the usual in-pe......
Request a trial to view additional results