R. v. K.T.S.,
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | MUNROE J. |
| Citation | 2020 ONSC 2672 |
| Date | 01 May 2020 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Docket Number | CR-3141-00BR (Chatham) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 practice notes
-
Table of cases
...KT , R v , 2013 ONCA 257 .........................................................232 KTS , R v , 2020 ONSC 2672 ........................................................42 Kulba , R v , 2021 ABCA 11 ...........................................617, 638, 644, 652 Kuldip , R v , [1990] 3 SCR 61......
-
From Evidence to Verdict: Confessions of a Judicial Fact-Finder
...does not require evidence. Is it a matter of common sense? Is it a notorious or indisputable fact? Is it necessary to ensure equality? 73 2020 ONSC 2672. 74 Ibid at para 75 (note omitted). Copyright © 2022 Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 2 From Evidence to Verdic......
-
R v PO, 2020 ABQB 355
...2020 QCCQ 1455; R v Anderson, 2020 BCPC 70; R v JA, 2020 ONSC 2312; R v JR, 2020 ONSC 1938; R v Janvier-Charland, 2020 BCSC 623; R v KTS, 2020 ONSC 2672. [40] The COVID-19 Pandemic has not changed the law of bail. It is not, by itself, a material change in circumstances, but informs the ana......
-
HMQ v. A.C.
...could not have affected the balancing exercise engaged in by the justice. 4. COVID-19 [125] I repeat my words in R. v. K.T.S., 2020 ONSC 2672, at paras. 121 and Without question, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is an extraordinary, frightful, and impactful event on the lives of everyone. Peop......
Get Started for Free
3 cases
-
R v PO, 2020 ABQB 355
...2020 QCCQ 1455; R v Anderson, 2020 BCPC 70; R v JA, 2020 ONSC 2312; R v JR, 2020 ONSC 1938; R v Janvier-Charland, 2020 BCSC 623; R v KTS, 2020 ONSC 2672. [40] The COVID-19 Pandemic has not changed the law of bail. It is not, by itself, a material change in circumstances, but informs the ana......
-
HMQ v. A.C.,
...could not have affected the balancing exercise engaged in by the justice. 4. COVID-19 [125] I repeat my words in R. v. K.T.S., 2020 ONSC 2672, at paras. 121 and Without question, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is an extraordinary, frightful, and impactful event on the lives of everyone. Peop......
-
R. v. S. E.,
...at para. 29; R. v. St-Cloud, 2015 SCC 27, at para. 70. [50] In R. v. K.T.S., 2020 ONSC 2672, Munroe J. summarized the principles applicable to the statutory grounds for detention at paras. 93- 98 as [93] The statutory grounds justi......
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...KT , R v , 2013 ONCA 257 .........................................................232 KTS , R v , 2020 ONSC 2672 ........................................................42 Kulba , R v , 2021 ABCA 11 ...........................................617, 638, 644, 652 Kuldip , R v , [1990] 3 SCR 61......
-
From Evidence to Verdict: Confessions of a Judicial Fact-Finder
...does not require evidence. Is it a matter of common sense? Is it a notorious or indisputable fact? Is it necessary to ensure equality? 73 2020 ONSC 2672. 74 Ibid at para 75 (note omitted). Copyright © 2022 Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 2 From Evidence to Verdic......