R. v. Kamal
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Judge | Watt, Paciocco and Fairburn JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2020 ONCA 213 |
| Date | 16 March 2020 |
| Docket Number | C61628 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 16 March 20, 2020)
...Assault, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Sentencing, Gladue Factors, Criminal Code, s. 273(1), R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64 R. v. K., 2020 ONCA 213 Keywords: Criminal Law, Robbery, Evidence, Admissibility, Prosper Warning, R. v. Fountain, 2017 ONCA 596 R. v. L., 2020 ONCA 203 (Appeal Book ......
-
R. v. Kell
...to elicit evidence from the detainee for a reasonable time would not make sense; it is not responsive to the situation: R. v. Kamal, 2020 ONCA 213, at para. 4; R. v. Fountain, 2017 ONCA 596 at para. 27; R. v. Wong, 2016 ONCJ 189, at paras. 17-18; R. v. Ilyassov, [2011] O.J. No. 1155 (O.C.J.......
-
R. v. O
...and then apparently changed their mind and decided to talk after reasonable efforts to contact counsel have been frustrated: R. v. Kamal, 2020 ONCA 213, at para. 4. [71] The circumstances of this case are very different. First, by the time Quashie began his interview, Mr. O’Dea had already ......
-
R. v. Dasilva Morim
...here. Appellate law binds me to conclude that a Prosper warning is only required in the limited circumstances described in R. v. Kamal, 2020 ONCA 213. While I appreciate Kamal was an appeal endorsement, and that endorsements are generally intended to apply to the specifics of their case, th......
2 cases
-
R. v. O
...and then apparently changed their mind and decided to talk after reasonable efforts to contact counsel have been frustrated: R. v. Kamal, 2020 ONCA 213, at para. 4. [71]       The circumstances of this case are very different. First, by the time Quashie began h......
-
R. v. Dasilva Morim
...here. Appellate law binds me to conclude that a Prosper warning is only required in the limited circumstances described in R. v. Kamal, 2020 ONCA 213. While I appreciate Kamal was an appeal endorsement, and that endorsements are generally intended to apply to the specifics of their case, th......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 16 March 20, 2020)
...Assault, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Sentencing, Gladue Factors, Criminal Code, s. 273(1), R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64 R. v. K., 2020 ONCA 213 Keywords: Criminal Law, Robbery, Evidence, Admissibility, Prosper Warning, R. v. Fountain, 2017 ONCA 596 R. v. L., 2020 ONCA 203 (Appeal Book ......
