R. v. Katerberg, 2019 ONCA 177

JurisdictionOntario
JudgePardu, Nordheimer and Harvison Young JJ.A.
Citation2019 ONCA 177
Date07 March 2019
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Docket NumberC61812
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 4 – 8, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 19 Marzo 2019
    ...Law, Unreasonable Search and Seizure, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s 10(b), 24(2), R v Grant, 2009 SCC 32 R v Katerberg, 2019 ONCA 177 [Pardu, Nordheimer and Harvison Young Halfyard and C. Rudnicki, for the appellant V. Rivers, for the respondent Keywords: Criminal Law, Marijuan......
  • R. v. Gardner,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 25 Mayo 2021
    ...inform the person as to the reason why the restraint is being imposed. [Emphasis added.] [27] Subsequently, in R. v. Katerberg, 2019 ONCA 177, 437 C.R.R. (2d) 69, at para. 7, the Ontario Court of Appeal reiterated the test as follows: It has been repeatedly stated that there are no technica......
  • R. v. Fern,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 17 Abril 2023
    ...example, R v Kelly (1985), 17 CCC (3d) 419 at 424 (Ont CA), R v Boliver, 2014 NSCA 99 at paras 11-21, 318 CCC (3d) 562 and R v Katerberg, 2019 ONCA 177 at paras 5-7). A police officer’s failure to tell a detainee exactly why he or she is being detained does not always result in an in......
  • R. v. Drakes-Simon,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 11 Enero 2021
    ...evidence, there is no legal barrier to the use of such evidence”[1] [157]      In R v. Katerberg 2019 ONCA 177, an officer conducting a RIDE program, noticed a strong smell of freshly harvested marijuana emanating from a van, when the driver lowered his windo......
3 cases
  • R. v. Gardner,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 25 Mayo 2021
    ...inform the person as to the reason why the restraint is being imposed. [Emphasis added.] [27] Subsequently, in R. v. Katerberg, 2019 ONCA 177, 437 C.R.R. (2d) 69, at para. 7, the Ontario Court of Appeal reiterated the test as follows: It has been repeatedly stated that there are no technica......
  • R. v. Fern,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 17 Abril 2023
    ...example, R v Kelly (1985), 17 CCC (3d) 419 at 424 (Ont CA), R v Boliver, 2014 NSCA 99 at paras 11-21, 318 CCC (3d) 562 and R v Katerberg, 2019 ONCA 177 at paras 5-7). A police officer’s failure to tell a detainee exactly why he or she is being detained does not always result in an in......
  • R. v. Drakes-Simon,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 11 Enero 2021
    ...evidence, there is no legal barrier to the use of such evidence”[1] [157]      In R v. Katerberg 2019 ONCA 177, an officer conducting a RIDE program, noticed a strong smell of freshly harvested marijuana emanating from a van, when the driver lowered his windo......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 4 – 8, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 19 Marzo 2019
    ...Law, Unreasonable Search and Seizure, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s 10(b), 24(2), R v Grant, 2009 SCC 32 R v Katerberg, 2019 ONCA 177 [Pardu, Nordheimer and Harvison Young Halfyard and C. Rudnicki, for the appellant V. Rivers, for the respondent Keywords: Criminal Law, Marijuan......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT