R v. Kemp

CourtCourt of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
JudgeMandziuk
Judgment Date18 February 2025
Citation2025 ABKB 83
Docket Number220227599Q1
Date18 February 2025

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 practice notes
  • R v. Gray
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 22, 2025
    ...of evidence, including the bodily remains of the deceased; Bobocel; R v White, 2006 ABQB 909 [White] at paras 8-9; Diebel; R v Kemp, 2025 ABKB 83 [Kemp] at para [102] Based on my review of the context in this case, the post-offence conduct of Mr. Gray falls into the middle of the spectrum. ......
  • R. v. Big Bull
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 20, 2026
    ...[71] I must consider whether diminished moral capacity reduces Dustin’s moral blameworthiness. As stated by Justice Mandziuk in R v Kemp, 2025 ABKB 83 at para 30, the degree of responsibility is tied to moral culpability and the extent to which the offender intended the consequences of thei......
  • R. v. Belanger
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 8, 2026
    ...the execution of his mother and grandparents during the Rwandan Genocide [96]        In R v Kemp, 2025 ABKB 83 a parole ineligibility period of 15 years was imposed. The offender and victim had several heated exchanges at bar. The offender briefly left the......
  • R v Belanger
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 8, 2026
    ...that the offender was young and had witnessed the execution of his mother and grandparents during the Rwandan Genocide 96 In R v Kemp, 2025 ABKB 83 a parole ineligibility period of 15 years was imposed. The offender and victim had several heated exchanges at bar. The offender briefly left t......
4 cases
  • R v. Gray
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 22, 2025
    ...of evidence, including the bodily remains of the deceased; Bobocel; R v White, 2006 ABQB 909 [White] at paras 8-9; Diebel; R v Kemp, 2025 ABKB 83 [Kemp] at para [102] Based on my review of the context in this case, the post-offence conduct of Mr. Gray falls into the middle of the spectrum. ......
  • R. v. Big Bull
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 20, 2026
    ...[71] I must consider whether diminished moral capacity reduces Dustin’s moral blameworthiness. As stated by Justice Mandziuk in R v Kemp, 2025 ABKB 83 at para 30, the degree of responsibility is tied to moral culpability and the extent to which the offender intended the consequences of thei......
  • R. v. Belanger
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 8, 2026
    ...the execution of his mother and grandparents during the Rwandan Genocide [96]        In R v Kemp, 2025 ABKB 83 a parole ineligibility period of 15 years was imposed. The offender and victim had several heated exchanges at bar. The offender briefly left the......
  • R v Belanger
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 8, 2026
    ...that the offender was young and had witnessed the execution of his mother and grandparents during the Rwandan Genocide 96 In R v Kemp, 2025 ABKB 83 a parole ineligibility period of 15 years was imposed. The offender and victim had several heated exchanges at bar. The offender briefly left t......