R v KGY, 2020 ABPC 171
| Judge | Honourable Judge P.B. Barley |
| Citation | 2020 ABPC 171 |
| Docket Number | 190784629Y1 |
| Court | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 19 October 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
R v Moeketsi,
...delays. See R v Morgan, 2020 ONCA 279; R v Cunningham, 2020 ONSC 2724, R v Loblaws, 2020 ABPC 250, R v Harker, 2020ABQB 603, R v KGY, 2020 ABPC 171. [55] In assessing whether the delay could have been mitigated, practical realities must be taken in to account. See R v KJM, 2019 SCC 55 at pa......
-
R. v. Truong,
...v. Folster, [2020] M.J. No. 187, at para. 28; R. v. G.R., 2020 ONCJ 578, at para. 3; R. v. Harker, 2020 ABQB 603, at para. 20; R. v. KGY, 2020 ABPC 171, at para. 40; R. v. Cathcart, 2020 SKQB, at para. [72] In Simmons, supra, at para. 60, Nakatsuru J. concluded that no reasonable person cou......
-
Toronto (City) v. Soudine,
...7; R v Folster, [2020] M.J. No. 187, at para. 28; R v G.R., 2020 ONCJ 578, at para. 3; R v Harker, 2020 ABQB 603, at para. 20; R v KGY, 2020 ABPC 171, at para. 40; R v Cathcart, 2020 SKQB, at para. 18. In R v Simmons, Justice Nakatsuru provides the following with regards to COVID-19 as a di......
-
The COVID-19 Pandemic And The Right To A Trial Within A Reasonable Time
...delay from the original trial date (re-scheduled due to COVID-19) to the anticipated end of the re-scheduled trial date (R v KGY, 2020 ABPC 171; R v Harker, 2020 ABQB 603; R v Parent, 2021 ABQB This calculation of a delay until the end of the rescheduled trial date in Alberta is a departure......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
R. v. Truong,
...v. Folster, [2020] M.J. No. 187, at para. 28; R. v. G.R., 2020 ONCJ 578, at para. 3; R. v. Harker, 2020 ABQB 603, at para. 20; R. v. KGY, 2020 ABPC 171, at para. 40; R. v. Cathcart, 2020 SKQB, at para. [72] In Simmons, supra, at para. 60, Nakatsuru J. concluded that no reasonable person cou......
-
R v Moeketsi,
...delays. See R v Morgan, 2020 ONCA 279; R v Cunningham, 2020 ONSC 2724, R v Loblaws, 2020 ABPC 250, R v Harker, 2020ABQB 603, R v KGY, 2020 ABPC 171. [55] In assessing whether the delay could have been mitigated, practical realities must be taken in to account. See R v KJM, 2019 SCC 55 at pa......
-
Toronto (City) v. Soudine,
...7; R v Folster, [2020] M.J. No. 187, at para. 28; R v G.R., 2020 ONCJ 578, at para. 3; R v Harker, 2020 ABQB 603, at para. 20; R v KGY, 2020 ABPC 171, at para. 40; R v Cathcart, 2020 SKQB, at para. 18. In R v Simmons, Justice Nakatsuru provides the following with regards to COVID-19 as a di......
-
R v KGY,
...brought an application for a stay of the charges under Section 11(b) of the Charter. This was rejected in the decision R v KGY 2020, ABPC 171 ISSUES 1) What sexual activities took place between SB and 2) Did SB have the capac......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
The COVID-19 Pandemic And The Right To A Trial Within A Reasonable Time
...delay from the original trial date (re-scheduled due to COVID-19) to the anticipated end of the re-scheduled trial date (R v KGY, 2020 ABPC 171; R v Harker, 2020 ABQB 603; R v Parent, 2021 ABQB This calculation of a delay until the end of the rescheduled trial date in Alberta is a departure......