R. v. Khan (A.), (1990) 113 N.R. 53 (SCC)
Judge | Lamer, C.J.C., Wilson, Sopinka, Gonthier and McLachlin, JJ. |
Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
Case Date | September 13, 1990 |
Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
Citations | (1990), 113 N.R. 53 (SCC);[1990] 2 SCR 531;1990 CanLII 77 (SCC);[1990] 410 AC 353;59 CCC (3d) 92;79 CR (3d) 1;113 NR 53;[1990] CarswellOnt 108;AZ-90111082;JE 90-1356;[1990] SCJ No 81 (QL);11 WCB (2d) 10;[1990] ACS no 81;41 OAC 353 |
R. v. Khan (A.) (1990), 113 N.R. 53 (SCC)
MLB headnote and full text
[French language version follows English language version]
[La version française vient à la suite de la version anglaise]
.........................
Abdullah Khan (appellant) v. Her Majesty The Queen (respondent)
(20963)
Indexed As: R. v. Khan (A.)
Supreme Court of Canada
Lamer, C.J.C., Wilson, Sopinka, Gonthier and McLachlin, JJ.
September 13, 1990.
Summary:
The accused physician was charged with sexually assaulting a four year old girl in his office. In response to a casual question from her mother 15 minutes after they left the accused's office, the girl told what the accused had done. The trial judge acquitted the accused after ruling that the girl was incompetent to testify and that the mother's statement about what she said was inadmissible as hearsay. The Crown appealed.
The Ontario Court of Appeal, in a judgment reported 27 O.A.C. 142; 42 C.C.C.(3d) 197; 64 C.R.(3d) 281, allowed the appeal, set aside the acquittal and ordered a new trial. The Court held that the trial judge erred in (1) holding that the girl was not competent to give unsworn testimony and (2) in excluding from evidence the mother's statement about what the girl said. The accused appealed.
The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the appeal. The court held that the girl was competent to testify unsworn, where she appeared to understand the nature of lying and the need to tell the truth. The court held further that the mother's statement about what the girl told her was admissible as a child's hearsay statement about a crime, which was both reasonably necessary and reliable.
Evidence - Topic 1712
Hearsay rule - Exceptions - Spontaneous declarations - What constitute - A four year old girl was allegedly sexually assaulted when left alone for a few minutes with her physician - In response to a casual question from her mother fifteen minutes after leaving the physician's office, the girl told the mother that the physician stuck his penis in her mouth - The Supreme Court of Canada held that the mother's statement of what the girl said was admissible, not as a spontaneous declaration (it was not contemporaneous), but as a child's hearsay statement about a crime, which was both reasonably necessary and reliable - See paragraphs 16 to 34.
Evidence - Topic 1751
Hearsay rule - Exceptions - Children's statements - General - [See Evidence - Topic 1712].
Evidence - Topic 5544
Witnesses - Competency - Child of tender years - The Supreme Court of Canada held that a four year old girl was competent to testify unsworn about an alleged sexual assault on her, where she appeared to understand the nature of lying and the need to tell the truth - See paragraphs 9 to 15.
Cases Noticed:
R. v. Bannerman (1966), 48 C.R. 110 (Man. C.A.), affd. [1966] S.C.R. v, dist. [para. 11].
Ares v. Venner, [1970] S.C.R. 608, appld. [para. 19].
Myers v. Director of Public Prosecutions, [1965] A.C. 1001, refd to. [para. 20].
Official Solicitor v. K., [1963] 3 All E.R. 191, consd. [para. 25].
D.R.H. v. Superintendent of Family and Child Services (1984), 41 R.F.L.(2d) 337 (B.C.C.A.), consd. [para. 25].
R. v. Abbey, [1982] 2 S.C.R. 24; 43 N.R. 30, refd to. [para. 25].
M.(W.) v. Prince Edward Island (Director of Child Welfare) (1986), 60 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 32; 181 A.P.R. 32; 3 R.F.L.(3d) 181, consd. [para. 26].
MacPhail v. Prince Edward Island (Director of Child Welfare) - see M.(W.) v. Prince Edward Island (Director of Child Welfare).
Foote v. Foote, [1988] B.C.J. No. 278 (C.A.), consd. [para. 27].
R. v. G.B. et al. (No. 2), [1990] 2 S.C.R. 30; 111 N.R. 31, appld. [para. 28].
Statutes Noticed:
Canada Evidence Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. E-10, sect. 16 [paras. 6, 9].
Authors and Works Noticed:
McCormick on Evidence (3rd Ed. 1984), p. 859 [para. 22].
Wharton's Criminal Evidence (13th Ed. 1970), pp. 84, 90 [para. 23].
Counsel:
Robert J. Carter, Q.C., and Larry B. O'Brien, for the appellant accused;
Kenneth L. Campbell, for the respondent Crown.
Solicitors of Record:
Carter, McCombs and Minden, Toronto, Ontario, for the appellant;
The Ministry of the Attorney General for Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, for the respondent.
This case was heard on November 3, 1989, at Ottawa, Ontario, before Lamer, J. (now C.J.C.), Wilson, Sopinka, Gonthier and McLachlin, JJ., of the Supreme Court of Canada.
On September 13, 1990, McLachlin, J., delivered the following judgment for the Supreme Court of Canada:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
R. v. J.E.D., (2002) 325 A.R. 305 (QB)
...56]. R. v. Gagnon (Y.R.J.) et al. (2000), 136 O.A.C. 116; 147 C.C.C.(3d) 983 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 385, footnote 57]. R. v. Khan, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 531; 113 N.R. 53; 41 O.A.C. 353; 59 C.C.C.(3d) 92; 79 C.R.(3d) 1, refd to. [para. 400, footnote R. v. Rockey (S.E.), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 829; 204 N......
-
Canmore Mountain Villas Inc. v. Alberta (Minister of Seniors and Community Supports) et al., (2010) 495 A.R. 323 (QB)
...9]. R. v. Khelawon (R.), [2006] 2 S.C.R. 787 ; 355 N.R. 267 ; 220 O.A.C. 338 ; 2006 SCC 57 , refd to. [para. 9]. R. v. Khan, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 531; 113 N.R. 53 ; 41 O.A.C. 353 , refd to. [para. R. v. Butler (K.) (2009), 472 A.R. 174 ; 2009 ABQB 97 , refd to. [para. 9]. R. v. G.N.D. (......
-
R. v. Parrott (W.), (1999) 175 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 89 (NFCA)
...Witnesses - Competency and compellability - Competency - Mental competency - [See Evidence - Topic 1527 ]. Cases Noticed: R. v. Khan, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 531; 113 N.R. 53 ; 41 O.A.C. 353 ; 59 C.C.C.(3d) 92 , refd to. [para. R. v. Smith (A.L.), [1992] 2 S.C.R. 915 ; 139 N.R. 323 ; 55 O.A.C......
-
R. v. James (W.A.) et al., 2007 NSCA 19
...171]. R. v. Starr (R.D.), [2000] 2 S.C.R. 144; 258 N.R. 250; 148 Man.R.(2d) 161; 224 W.A.C. 161, refd to. [para. 175]. R. v. Khan, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 531; 113 N.R. 53; 41 O.A.C. 353, refd to. [para. R. v. Douglas and Douris, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 301; 122 N.R. 1; 47 O.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 189]. R......
-
R. v. J.E.D., (2002) 325 A.R. 305 (QB)
...56]. R. v. Gagnon (Y.R.J.) et al. (2000), 136 O.A.C. 116; 147 C.C.C.(3d) 983 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 385, footnote 57]. R. v. Khan, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 531; 113 N.R. 53; 41 O.A.C. 353; 59 C.C.C.(3d) 92; 79 C.R.(3d) 1, refd to. [para. 400, footnote R. v. Rockey (S.E.), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 829; 204 N......
-
Canmore Mountain Villas Inc. v. Alberta (Minister of Seniors and Community Supports) et al., (2010) 495 A.R. 323 (QB)
...9]. R. v. Khelawon (R.), [2006] 2 S.C.R. 787 ; 355 N.R. 267 ; 220 O.A.C. 338 ; 2006 SCC 57 , refd to. [para. 9]. R. v. Khan, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 531; 113 N.R. 53 ; 41 O.A.C. 353 , refd to. [para. R. v. Butler (K.) (2009), 472 A.R. 174 ; 2009 ABQB 97 , refd to. [para. 9]. R. v. G.N.D. (......
-
R. v. James (W.A.) et al., 2007 NSCA 19
...171]. R. v. Starr (R.D.), [2000] 2 S.C.R. 144; 258 N.R. 250; 148 Man.R.(2d) 161; 224 W.A.C. 161, refd to. [para. 175]. R. v. Khan, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 531; 113 N.R. 53; 41 O.A.C. 353, refd to. [para. R. v. Douglas and Douris, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 301; 122 N.R. 1; 47 O.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 189]. R......
-
R. v. Alcantara (J.R.) et al., (2015) 606 A.R. 313
...745, refd to. [para. 122]. R. v. Smith (A.L.), [1992] 2 S.C.R. 915; 139 N.R. 323; 55 O.A.C. 321, refd to. [para. 123]. R. v. Khan, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 531; 113 N.R. 53; 41 O.A.C. 353, refd to. [para. 123]. R. v. Hape, 2002 CarswellOnt 185, refd to. [para. 124]. R. v. Starr (R.D.), [2000] 2 S.C.......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 25 ' 29, 2020)
...Prior Consistent Statements, Sufficiency of Reasons, Criminal Code, ss. 151(a), 153(1)(a), 271, 278, 696(1)(a)(i), R. v. Khan, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 531, R. v. W.(R.), [1992] 2 S.C.R. 122, Kienapple v. The Queen, [1975] 1 S.C.R. 729, R. v. Howe (2005), 192 C.C.C. (3d) 480 (Ont. C.A.), R. v. W.H.,......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 11 November 15, 2019)
...No. 487, R. v. B. (F.F.), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 697, R. v. J.A.T., 2012 ONCA 177, R. v. Khan (1988), 42 C.C.C. (3d) 197 (Ont. C.A.), aff'd [1990] 2 S.C.R. 531, R. v. Nurse, 2019 ONCA 260, Ratten v. The Queen, [1972] A.C. 378 (P.C.), R. v. Nicholas (2004), 182 C.C.C. (3d) 393 (Ont. C.A.), leave to......
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 11 September 15, 2017)
...to Sexual Touching, Evidence, Hearsay, Criminal Code, ss. 151, 152, 271 and 715.1, Kienapple v. R., [1975] 1 S.C.R. 729, R. v. Khan, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 531, R v W.(D.), [1991] 1 S.C.R. 742, R. v. H. (D.), 2016 ONCA 569 R v. Grandine, 2017 ONCA 718 [MacPherson, Simmons and Brown JJ.A.] Counsel:......
-
"I Saw That Guy Hit You!"' The Admissibility Of Hearsay Statements
...if admissible, it will strengthen your case! Footnotes 1 R v Khelawon, 2006 SCC 57. 2 R v Starr, 2000 SCC 40 at para 48. 3 R v Khan, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 531, [1990] S.C.J. No. 4 R v Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35; R v KGB, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 740, [1993] S.C.J. No. 22. 5 R v Blackman, 2008 SCC 37 at para 38......
-
Table of cases
...697, 61 CCC (3d) 1, [1990] SCJ No 131 ......................................................................... 198–99, 352 R v Khan, [1990] 2 SCR 531, 59 CCC (3d) 92, [1990] SCJ No 81 ..................... 298 Table of Cases 393 R v Khawaja (2006), 214 CCC (3d) 399, 42 CR (6th) 348, 2006 C......
-
Successful Tobacco Litigation in Quebec: Why Hold Cigarettes to a Higher Standard Than Pharmaceutical Products?
...Bryant et al, The Law of Evidence in Canada, 3d ed (Toronto: LexisNexis Canada, 2009) at 3–10. Ares v Venner, [1970] SCR 608. R v Khan, [1990] 2 SCR 531. 71 72 The C a nadia n Cl a ss Action R admissibility of expert evidence as set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in the Mohan line of ca......
-
Table of cases
...546 R. v. Keegstra (1990), 61 C.C.C. (3d) 1 (S.C.C.) .............................................. 261 R. v. Khan, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 531 ........................................................................ 593 R. v. Kirkwood (1983), 35 C.R. (3d) 97 (Ont. C.A.) .................................
-
Hearsay
...semen and a mixture of semen and saliva. 39 Wigmore on Evidence , 3d ed, vol 5 (Boston: Little, Brown, 1940) at para 1427. 40 R v Khan , [1990] 2 SCR 531 [ Khan ]. 41 Ibid at 534. Hearsay 153 At trial, the judge ruled, under the strict competency rules in force at the time, that the child w......