R. v. Kinamore, 2025 SCC 19
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Wagner, Richard; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas; Jamal, Mahmud; O’Bonsawin, Michelle; Moreau, Mary |
| Docket Number | 40964 |
| Date | 13 June 2025 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2025 SCC 19 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
R v Kinamore,
...Criminal Trial Lawyers' Association, Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia and Criminal Lawyers' Association (Ontario) Interveners 2025 SCC 19 Present: Wagner C.J. and Karakatsanis, Côté, Rowe, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal, O'Bonsawin and Moreau JJ. DOCKET: 40964 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA C......
-
R v Arapakota,
...the context, purpose and relevant legal norms”: R. v. Alex, 2017 SCC 37, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 967, at para. 31; see also R. v. Kinamore, 2025 SCC 19, 503 D.L.R. (4th) 385, at para. 66; Piekut v. Canada (National Revenue), 2025 SCC 13, 502 D.L.R. (4th) 1, at para. 65 The modern approach to statut......
-
R v J.W.,
...that it is not being adduced for the purpose of supporting one of the prohibited inferences identified in s. 276(1): R. v. Kinamore, 2025 SCC 19, 448 C.C.C. (3d) 427, at para. 30. Even in this context, the admission of such evidence is not absolutely prohibited. As Wagner, C.J. explained, a......
3 cases
-
R v Kinamore,
...Criminal Trial Lawyers' Association, Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia and Criminal Lawyers' Association (Ontario) Interveners 2025 SCC 19 Present: Wagner C.J. and Karakatsanis, Côté, Rowe, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal, O'Bonsawin and Moreau JJ. DOCKET: 40964 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA C......
-
R v Arapakota,
...the context, purpose and relevant legal norms”: R. v. Alex, 2017 SCC 37, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 967, at para. 31; see also R. v. Kinamore, 2025 SCC 19, 503 D.L.R. (4th) 385, at para. 66; Piekut v. Canada (National Revenue), 2025 SCC 13, 502 D.L.R. (4th) 1, at para. 65 The modern approach to statut......
-
R v J.W.,
...that it is not being adduced for the purpose of supporting one of the prohibited inferences identified in s. 276(1): R. v. Kinamore, 2025 SCC 19, 448 C.C.C. (3d) 427, at para. 30. Even in this context, the admission of such evidence is not absolutely prohibited. As Wagner, C.J. explained, a......