R v Kionke, 2020 MBCA 32
Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
Judge | Mr. Justice Michel A. Monnin,Madam Justice Freda M. Steel,Madam Justice Jennifer A. Pfuetzner |
Citation | 2020 MBCA 32 |
Docket Number | AR18-30-09144 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Manitoba) |
Date | 16 March 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Beaulieu et al v Winnipeg (City of) et al,
...Demonstrating a misapprehension requires a plainly identifiable error and an actual mistake. As explained by Steel JA in R v Kionke, 2020 MBCA 32 (at para A misapprehension of the evidence may refer to a mistake as to the substance of the evidence, a failure to consider evidence relev......
-
R v Dowd,
...the parties that a trier of fact’s credibility assessment must be grounded in the evidence. As Steel JA stated in R v Kionke, 2020 MBCA 32, “[a]n inference which does not flow logically and reasonably from established facts cannot be made and is merely conjecture and spe......
-
R v NBT,
...assumptions that are not grounded in the evidence” (R v JC, 2021 ONCA 131 at para 58; see also paras 59-61, 63, 74; R v Kionke, 2020 MBCA 32 at para 22; R v Pastro, 2021 BCCA 149 at paras 2-4, 40-52; and R v Mazhari-Ravesh, 2022 MBCA 63 at paras [18] ......
-
R v Abbasi, 2020 MBCA 119
...conclusions of a trial judge unless there has been palpable and overriding error (R v Wright, 2013 MBCA 109 at para 30; and R v Kionke, 2020 MBCA 32 at para [23] A trial judge’s decision to admit rebuttal evidence is “discretionary and, as a result will generally be accorded deference. Howe......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Beaulieu et al v Winnipeg (City of) et al,
...Demonstrating a misapprehension requires a plainly identifiable error and an actual mistake. As explained by Steel JA in R v Kionke, 2020 MBCA 32 (at para A misapprehension of the evidence may refer to a mistake as to the substance of the evidence, a failure to consider evidence relev......
-
R v Dowd,
...the parties that a trier of fact’s credibility assessment must be grounded in the evidence. As Steel JA stated in R v Kionke, 2020 MBCA 32, “[a]n inference which does not flow logically and reasonably from established facts cannot be made and is merely conjecture and spe......
-
R v NBT,
...assumptions that are not grounded in the evidence” (R v JC, 2021 ONCA 131 at para 58; see also paras 59-61, 63, 74; R v Kionke, 2020 MBCA 32 at para 22; R v Pastro, 2021 BCCA 149 at paras 2-4, 40-52; and R v Mazhari-Ravesh, 2022 MBCA 63 at paras [18] ......
-
R v Abbasi, 2020 MBCA 119
...conclusions of a trial judge unless there has been palpable and overriding error (R v Wright, 2013 MBCA 109 at para 30; and R v Kionke, 2020 MBCA 32 at para [23] A trial judge’s decision to admit rebuttal evidence is “discretionary and, as a result will generally be accorded deference. Howe......
Request a trial to view additional results