R. v. Kloubakov, 2025 SCC 25
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Wagner, Richard; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas; Jamal, Mahmud; O’Bonsawin, Michelle; Moreau, Mary |
| Citation | 2025 SCC 25 |
| Date | 24 July 2025 |
| Docket Number | 41017 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 practice notes
-
R v Kloubakov,
...Coalition of Rape Crisis Centres, Evangelical Fellowship of Canada and Association for Reformed Political Action Canada Interveners 2025 SCC 25 Present: Wagner C.J. and Karakatsanis, Côté, Rowe, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal, O'Bonsawin and Moreau JJ. DOCKET: 41017 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Constitu......
-
McPherson v Global Growth Assets Inc.,
...Revenue), 2025 SCC 13, at para. 42. 18 Rizzo, at para. 21; Piekut, at para. 42; R. v. Kim, 2025 ONCA 478, at para. 31; R. v. Kloubakov, 2025 SCC 25, at para. 19 Telus, at para. 32. 20 Piekut, at para. 43. 21 Piekut, at para. 45; Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2......
-
R v Carpan,
...accepts that taking exploitative (parasitic) advantage of vulnerable people, even without fraud, can be criminal: compare R v Kloubakov, 2025 SCC 25 at paras 64, 70–77, 82–84, 88–103, 505 DLR (4th) 41 In our respectful view, Parliament intended a broad, not a narrow or technical, interpreta......
-
R v Ritchie,
...stage, the claimant must show that this deprivation was not in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice: R. v. Kloubakov, 2025 SCC 25, at paras. 136–137; R. v. J.J., 2022 SCC 28, at para. 112 State interference with bodily integrity and serious state imposed psychological stres......
Get Started for Free
7 cases
-
R v Kloubakov,
...Coalition of Rape Crisis Centres, Evangelical Fellowship of Canada and Association for Reformed Political Action Canada Interveners 2025 SCC 25 Present: Wagner C.J. and Karakatsanis, Côté, Rowe, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal, O'Bonsawin and Moreau JJ. DOCKET: 41017 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Constitu......
-
McPherson v Global Growth Assets Inc.,
...Revenue), 2025 SCC 13, at para. 42. 18 Rizzo, at para. 21; Piekut, at para. 42; R. v. Kim, 2025 ONCA 478, at para. 31; R. v. Kloubakov, 2025 SCC 25, at para. 19 Telus, at para. 32. 20 Piekut, at para. 43. 21 Piekut, at para. 45; Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2......
-
R v Carpan,
...accepts that taking exploitative (parasitic) advantage of vulnerable people, even without fraud, can be criminal: compare R v Kloubakov, 2025 SCC 25 at paras 64, 70–77, 82–84, 88–103, 505 DLR (4th) 41 In our respectful view, Parliament intended a broad, not a narrow or technical, interpreta......
-
The Canadian Transit Company v Canada (Attorney General),
...1, at para. 42. 11 Rizzo, at para. 21; Piekut, at para. 42; R. v. Kim, 2025 ONCA 478, 450 C.C.C. (3d) 441, at para. 31; R. v. Kloubakov, 2025 SCC 25, 505 D.L.R. (4th) 197, at para. 12 Telus, at para. 32. 13 Piekut, at para. 43. 14 Piekut, at para. 45; Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Imm......
Get Started for Free