R. v. Kruk
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Neutral Citation | 2024 SCC 7 |
| Citation | 2024 SCC 7 |
| Docket Number | 40095; 40447 |
| Date | 08 March 2024 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
192 practice notes
-
Pike v. Wight
...TCC 55; R. v. Dinardo, 2008 SCC 24, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 788; Stassis v. Amicus Bank, 2014 NLCA 38; Cooper v. Cooper, 2001 NFCA 4; R. v. Kruk, 2024 SCC 7; Osmond v. Clarke, 2007 NLCA 11; R. v. Find, 2001 SCC 32, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 863; Hickey v. Hickey, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 518; Moge v. Moge, [1992] 3 S......
-
Dr Ignacio Tan III v. Alberta Veterinary Medical Association
...numerous, would not destroy the decision made if they do not remove its foundations or scramble its analysis. Recently in R v Kruk, 2024 SCC 7 at para 90, 489 DLR (4th) 385 the Supreme Court of Canada 90 In general, the introduction of new errors of law has the potential to upset the establ......
-
R v. Stevenson
...witnesses are findings of fact, and, for that reason, they are generally subject to a deferential standard of appellate review (R v Kruk, 2024 SCC 7 at paras 81–85 [Kruk]; R v R.P., 2012 SCC 22 at para 10, [2012] 1 SCR 746 [R.P.]; R v W.H., 2013 SCC 22 at paras 33–34, [2013] 2 SCR 180). In ......
-
R v. Qiyuk et al.
...in operation. [93] More directly to the point at hand, the Supreme Court of Canada in R v Kruk, 2024 SCC 7, para 96, 433 CCC (3d) 301, recently pointed out that reference to the common reason and collective human experience is not necessarily contro......
Get Started for Free
192 cases
-
Pike v. Wight
...TCC 55; R. v. Dinardo, 2008 SCC 24, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 788; Stassis v. Amicus Bank, 2014 NLCA 38; Cooper v. Cooper, 2001 NFCA 4; R. v. Kruk, 2024 SCC 7; Osmond v. Clarke, 2007 NLCA 11; R. v. Find, 2001 SCC 32, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 863; Hickey v. Hickey, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 518; Moge v. Moge, [1992] 3 S......
-
Dr Ignacio Tan III v. Alberta Veterinary Medical Association
...numerous, would not destroy the decision made if they do not remove its foundations or scramble its analysis. Recently in R v Kruk, 2024 SCC 7 at para 90, 489 DLR (4th) 385 the Supreme Court of Canada 90 In general, the introduction of new errors of law has the potential to upset the establ......
-
R v. Stevenson
...witnesses are findings of fact, and, for that reason, they are generally subject to a deferential standard of appellate review (R v Kruk, 2024 SCC 7 at paras 81–85 [Kruk]; R v R.P., 2012 SCC 22 at para 10, [2012] 1 SCR 746 [R.P.]; R v W.H., 2013 SCC 22 at paras 33–34, [2013] 2 SCR 180). In ......
-
R v. Qiyuk et al.
...in operation. [93] More directly to the point at hand, the Supreme Court of Canada in R v Kruk, 2024 SCC 7, para 96, 433 CCC (3d) 301, recently pointed out that reference to the common reason and collective human experience is not necessarily contro......
Get Started for Free