R. v. L. (D.O.)
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | Lamer, Antonio; La Forest, Gérard V.; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Sopinka, John; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C. |
| Citation | [1993] 4 SCR 419,85 CCC (3d) 289,161 NR 1,18 CRR (2d) 257,[1993] SCJ No 72 (QL),51 WAC 241,1993 CanLII 46 (SCC),[1993] CarswellMan 24,25 CR (4th) 285 |
| Date | 18 November 1993 |
| Docket Number | 22660 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
685 practice notes
-
R. v. Silveira (A.)
...577; 33 Alta. L.R.(2d) 193; 27 B.L.R. 297; 84 D.T.C. 6467; 2 C.P.R.(3d) 1; 11 D.L.R.(4th) 641, refd to. [para. 68]. R. v. D.O.L., [1993] 4 S.C.R. 419; 161 N.R. 1; 88 Man.R.(2d) 241; 51 W.A.C. 241, refd to. [para. 71]. R. v. McKinlay Transport Ltd. and C.T. Transport Inc., [1990] 1 S.C.R. 62......
-
R. v. N.S.
...(M.G.), [2004] 1 S.C.R. 193; 316 N.R. 52; 184 O.A.C. 1; 2004 SCC 5, refd to. [para. 49]. R. v. L.O. - see R. v. D.O.L. R. v. D.O.L., [1993] 4 S.C.R. 419; 161 N.R. 1; 88 Man.R.(2d) 241; 51 W.A.C. 241, refd to. [para. R. v. Darrach (A.S.), [2000] 2 S.C.R. 443; 259 N.R. 336; 137 O.A.C. 91; 200......
-
Baril v. Obelnicki
...1 S.C.R. 554; 347 N.R. 201; 210 O.A.C. 200; 2006 SCC 15, refd to. [para. 92]. R. v. Rodgers - see R. v. Jackpine (R.). R. v. D.O.L., [1993] 4 S.C.R. 419; 161 N.R. 1; 88 Man.R.(2d) 241; 51 W.A.C. 241, refd to. [para. Beally v. Allsopp (2000), 149 Man.R.(2d) 277; 2000 MBQB 142, refd to. [para......
-
R. v. Friesen
...SCC 38, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 1021; R. v. Hajar, 2016 ABCA 222, 39 Alta. L.R. (6th) 209; R. v. McCraw, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 72; R. v. L. (D.O.), [1993] 4 S.C.R. 419; R. v. J.R.G., [2013] B.C.J. No. 1401 (QL); R. v. Stuckless, 2016 ONCJ 338; R. v. D.R.W., 2012 BCCA 454, 330 B.C.A.C. 18; R. v. L.M., 201......
Get Started for Free
505 cases
-
R. v. Feeney (M.)
...intervention has been demonstrated with respect to the trial judge's findings of fact on this point (see, e.g., R. v. L. (D.O.) , [1993] 4 S.C.R. 419, at p. 467) ..." [167] Sopinka, J., however, suggests that simply watching the trailer would have been a sufficient response by the officers ......
-
R. v. Trochym (S.J.)
...to. [para. 81]. R. v. White (R.G.) and Côté (Y.), [1998] 2 S.C.R. 72; 227 N.R. 326; 112 O.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 108]. R. v. D.O.L., [1993] 4 S.C.R. 419; 161 N.R. 1; 88 Man.R.(2d) 241; 51 W.A.C. 241, refd to. [para. Lavallee, Rackel & Heintz et al. v. Canada (Attorney General), [2002] ......
-
R. v. Trochym (S.J.)
...to. [para. 81]. R. v. White (R.G.) and Côté (Y.), [1998] 2 S.C.R. 72; 227 N.R. 326; 112 O.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 108]. R. v. D.O.L., [1993] 4 S.C.R. 419; 161 N.R. 1; 88 Man.R.(2d) 241; 51 W.A.C. 241, refd to. [para. Lavallee, Rackel & Heintz et al. v. Canada (Attorney General), [2002] ......
-
A. (L.L.) v. B. (A.)
...910; R. v. Osolin, [1993] 4 S.C.R. 595; Canadian Newspapers Co. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1988] 2 S.C.R. 122; R. v. L. (D.O.), [1993] 4 S.C.R. 419; Re Church of Scientology and The Queen (No. 6) (1987), 31 C.C.C. (3d) 449; RWDSU v. Dolphin Delivery Ltd., [1986] 2 S.C.R. 573; Hill v. Ch......
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 5 - 9, 2019)
...to Touching, Sexual Interference, Evidence, Admissibility, Minors, Video Evidence, Third Party Records, Sentencing, R. v. L. (D.O.), [1993] 4 S.C.R. 419, R. v. Edgar, 2010 ONCA 0529, R. v. R.E.M., [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3, R. v. W.(D), [1991] 1 S.C.R. 742, R. v. L.L., 2009 ONCA 0413, R. v. Radclif......
-
Canada - A Legal Guide for Business Investment and Expansion (Updated)
...the Disclosure Provinces do not have consistent legislation respecting franchising. Each Franchise Act differs; particularly in terms of the 24 or 25 material items that require specific disclosure, and which items are normally prescribed in regulations. Accordingly, if an FDD has been prep......
88 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...v Brown (1992), 13 CR (4th) 346 (Alta CA) 78 R v Friesen, 2020 SCC 9 92 R v Khan, [1990] 2 SCR 531 511 R v L(DO), 1993 CanLII 46 (SCC), [1993] 4 SCR 419 R v Lavallee, [1990] 1 SCR 852 78–79 R v Levogiannis, [1993] 4 SCR 475 93 R v McKimmon, [1990] 1 CTC 109 (Fed CA) 225, 254–55 R v MH, 2014......
-
Table of Cases
...The law of evidence 580 R. v. L.(D.O.) (1991), 6 C.R. (4th) 277, 65 C.C.C. (3d) 465, 73 Man. R. (2d) 238, 3 W.A.C. 238 (C.A.), rev’d [1993] 4 S.C.R. 419, 25 C.R. (4th) 285, 85 C.C.C. (3d) 289, 88 Man. R. (2d) 241, 51 W.A.C. 241, 161 N.R. 1 .........................................................
-
Measuring judicial activism on the Supreme Court of Canada: a comment on Newfoundland (Treasury Board) v. NAPE.
...78 R. v. Jones, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 284 * R. v. Jones, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 229 * R. v. Keegstra, [1990] 3 S.C.R, 697 * * R. v. L. (D.O.), [1993] 4 S.C.R. 419 * R. v. Laba, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 965 * * R. v. Ladouceur, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1257 * * R. v. Landry, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 99 * * R. v. Latimer, [2001] 1 ......
-
Table of cases
...............................253 L(C) , R v , 1999 CanLII 1491, 138 CCC (3d) 356 (Ont CA) ..............................246 L(DO) , R v , [1993] 4 SCR 419 ............................................ 241, 242, 390 L(WK) , R v , [1991] 1 SCR 1091 ....................................................
Get Started for Free
89 provisions
-
Community Safety and Policing Act, 2019, S.O. 2019, c. 1, Sched. 1
...applicable rules of conduct; (“faute”) “municipal board” means a board constituted by a municipality or municipalities under section 22, 23, 24 or 25; (“commission “O.P.P. detachment board” means a board referred to in section 67; (“conseil de détachement de la Police provinciale”) “persona......
-
Child and Family Services Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.11
...provided to children. R.S.O. 1990, c. C.11, s. 214 (1); 1999, c. 2, s. 32 (1-3). Same (2) A regulation made under paragraph 6.1, 12.1, 18, 24 or 25 of subsection (1) (boards of approved agencies, training of persons providing approved services, transfer of assets, prescribed provisions in......
-
Police Services Act, 2018, S.O. 2018, c. 3, Sched. 1
...Ministry of the Minister; (“ministère”) “municipal board” means a board constituted by a municipal council or councils under section 22, 23, 24 or 25; (“commission “O.P.P. detachment board” means a board referred to in section 67; (“conseil de détachement de la Police provinciale”) “persona......
-
GENERAL MATTERS UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL O. Reg. 155/18
...of the Act. O. Reg. 308/24, s. 1 (1). (13) Unless an extension is granted pursuant to section 123, a person referred to in item 21, 22, 23, 24 or 25 of the Table to section 121 (a) request the broad record check within seven days after the child protection worker, a person designated by the......
Get Started for Free
