R. v. Laboucan (A.F.), (1999) 23 B.C.T.C. 41 (SC)

JudgeCurtis, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateFriday June 18, 1999
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations(1999), 23 B.C.T.C. 41 (SC)

R. v. Laboucan (A.F.) (1999), 23 B.C.T.C. 41 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2000] B.C.T.C. TBEd. FE.026

Her Majesty The Queen v. Adam Frank Laboucan

(SC18951)

Indexed As: R. v. Laboucan (A.F.)

British Columbia Supreme Court

Quesnel

Curtis, J.

June 18, 1999.

Summary:

The 15.5 year old accused pleaded guilty to sexual assault causing bodily harm. The accused admitted to putting his penis in an infant's rectum. The accused was babysitting the 3.5 month old victim at the time of the offence. The Crown sought to have the accused declared a dangerous offender.

The British Columbia Supreme Court declared the accused a dangerous offender. The court imposed an indeterminate sen­tence.

Criminal Law - Topic 6503

Dangerous or long-term offenders - De­ten­tion - General - Dangerous offender - Defined - See paragraphs 1 to 49.

Criminal Law - Topic 6553

Dangerous or long-term offenders - De­ten­tion - Protection of the public - Bru­tality of predicate offence - See para­graphs 1 to 49.

Criminal Law - Topic 6558

Dangerous or long-term offenders - De­ten­tion - Protection of the public - Dan­gerous sexual offender - See paragraphs 1 to 49.

Criminal Law - Topic 6575

Dangerous or long-term offenders - De­ten­tion - Sentencing - Sentence - See para­graphs 1 to 49.

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Carlton (1981), 32 A.R. 181; 69 C.C.C.(2d) 1 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 15].

R. v. Turley (R.J.) (1999), 122 B.C.A.C. 133; 200 W.A.C. 133 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 31].

Statutes Noticed:

Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, sect. 753(a)(iii), sect. 753(b) [para. 8]; sect. 761(1) [para. 35].

Counsel:

William Hilderman, for the Crown;

Richard Gibbs and Beatrix Josephy, for the accused.

This matter was heard by Curtis, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on June 18, 1999.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
1 practice notes
  • R. v. Laboucan (A.F.), 2002 BCCA 376
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • March 27, 2002
    ...The Crown sought to have the accused declared a dangerous offender. The British Columbia Supreme Court, in a decision reported at 23 B.C.T.C. 41, declared the accused a dangerous offender. The court imposed an indeterminate sentence. The accused appealed the determination and The British Co......
1 cases
  • R. v. Laboucan (A.F.), 2002 BCCA 376
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • March 27, 2002
    ...The Crown sought to have the accused declared a dangerous offender. The British Columbia Supreme Court, in a decision reported at 23 B.C.T.C. 41, declared the accused a dangerous offender. The court imposed an indeterminate sentence. The accused appealed the determination and The British Co......