R. v. Lacasse (T.), [2015] N.R. TBEd. DE.019

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, C.J.C., Abella, Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Wagner, Gascon and Côté, JJ.
Citation[2015] N.R. TBEd. DE.019,2015 SCC 64
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date17 December 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
1855 practice notes
  • R. v. Denny (A.N.), 2016 NSSC 76
    • Canada
    • Nova Scotia Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • February 22, 2016
    ...[para. 151]. R. v. Reid (H.C.), [2006] B.C.T.C. Uned. E14; 2006 BCSC 456, refd to. [para. 151]. R. v. Lacasse (T.) (2015), 478 N.R. 319; 2015 SCC 64, refd to. [para. 154]. R. v. Aburto (M.E.) (2009), 277 B.C.A.C. 29; 469 W.A.C. 29; 2009 BCCA 2175, refd to. [para. 158]. R. v. Holloway (P.S.)......
  • R v McColman,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • March 23, 2023
    ...2 S.C.R. 548; R. v. Tim, 2022 SCC 12; R. v. Mann, 2004 SCC 52, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 59; R. v. Bernshaw, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 254; R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 1089; R. v. Beaver, 2022 SCC 54; R. v. Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58, [2018] 3 S.C.R. 599. APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Cour......
  • R. v. Rossi (K.J.), 2016 ABCA 43
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 19, 2016
    ...or partially served (incl. appeal delay) - [See Criminal Law - Topic 5886.1 ]. Cases Noticed: R. v. Lacasse (T.) (2015), 478 N.R. 319; 2015 SCC 64, refd to. [para. 14, footnote 2]. Sahaluk v. Alberta (Transportation Safety Board) (2015), 75 M.V.R.(6th) 10; 2015 ABQB 142, refd to. [para. 14,......
  • R. v. Nahanee, 2022 SCC 37
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 27, 2022
    ...nor helpful to try to fit the analysis of procedural unfairness into the framework for appellate intervention set out in R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 1089 , and R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9 . The decisions in Lacasse and Friesen do not detract from the Court’s longstand......
  • Get Started for Free
1715 cases
  • R v Loiacono, 2022 ABPC 70
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 30, 2022
    ...R v Qureshi, 2011 ABPC 332 [“Qureshi”]; R v Sandercock, 1985ABCA 218 [“Sandercock”]; R v Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64 [“Lacasse”]; R v Nasogaluak, 2010 SCC 6 [“Nasogaluak”]; R v Kastanis, 2021 ONSC 4054 [“Kastanis”]; R v Thiessen......
  • R. v. K.R.J., 2016 SCC 31
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • July 21, 2016
    ...A.G., [1975] A.C. 591; R. v. Kelly, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 170; R. v. Murrins, 2002 NSCA 12, 201 N.S.R. (2d) 288; R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 1089; R. v. Ipeelee, 2012 SCC 13, [2012] 1 S.C.R. 433; R. v. Lyons, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 309; R. v. Hooyer, 2016 ONCA 44, 129 O.R. (3d) 81; R. v.......
  • R v Goforth, 2021 SKCA 20
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • February 2, 2021
    ...718.1), a fit sentence is one that is proportionate to the gravity of the offence and the moral culpability of the offender (R v Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64, [2015] 3 SCR 1089). While a sentence may be measured in terms of years of imprisonment, there is no universal measure for offence gravity or......
  • R v SLW, 2018 ABCA 235
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • June 29, 2018
    ...125, line 4. The word “Professor” has been changed to “Mr.”. [1] Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, s. 271. [2] The Queen v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64, ¶¶40 & 52; [2015] 3 S.C.R. 1089, 1110 & 1115-16; The Queen v. C.A.M., [1996] 1 S.C.R. 500, 565 & The Queen v. Shropshire, [1995] 4......
  • Get Started for Free
36 firm's commentaries
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 11-15, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 28, 2019
    ...718.3(7), Tougher Penalties for Child Predators Act, S.C. 2015, c. 23, R. v. Khawaja, 2012 SCC 69, R. v. L.M., 2008 SCC 31, R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64, R. v. John, 2018 ONCA 702, R. v. Ahmed, 2017 ONCA 76, R. v. Jewell (1995), 100 C.C.C. (3d) 270 (C.A.), R. v. R.B., 2014 ONCA 840, R. v. J.S......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 11 – November 15, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 22, 2019
    ...Incest, Sexual Assault, Child Pornography, Sentencing, Criminal Code, ss. 718.01, 718.2, R. v. Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58 , R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64, R. v. P.M., 2012 ONCA 162 R. v. M., 2019 ONCA 890 Keywords: Criminal Law, Second Degree Murder, Jury Trials, Jury Instruction, Evidence, ......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 9 – 13 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • September 23, 2019
    ...2015 SCC 38, R v McLellan, 2018 ONCA 510, R v Adamson, 2018 ONCA 678, R v Moffit, 2015 ONCA 412, R v Campbell, 2018 ONCA 837, R v Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64 R v. Beseiso , 2019 ONCA 707 [Pardu, Brown and Trotter JJ.A.] Counsel: AB, acting in person Andrew Hotke, for the respondent Keywords: Crimi......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 8 – 12, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • April 30, 2019
    ...(1996) 30 O.R. (3d) 538 (C.A.), R. v. Nassri, 2015 ONCA 316, R. v. Thurairajah, 2008 ONCA 91, R. v. Laine, 2015 ONCA 519, R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64, Criminal Code, R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46, s. 380(1)(a), s. 742.1(c) R. v. N'Kansah, 2019 ONCA 290 [Rouleau, Miller and Fairburn JJ.A] Counsel: T.......
  • Get Started for Free
97 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Offences Against Children, 2nd Edition
    • May 3, 2023
    ...80 Labre , R v , 2013 ONCJ 116 .......................................................... 231 Lacasse , R v , 2015 SCC 64 ....................................................... 614, 640 Lamb , R v , 2010 BCSC 1911 ......................................................... 229 Lamkin , R v ,......
  • Digest: R v Nahnybida, 2018 SKCA 72
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • August 18, 2019
    ...Kresko, 2013 ONSC 1631, 42 MVR (6th) 224 R v Kusch, 2016 SKQB 260, 132 WCB (2d) 539 R v L.D.H., 2009 SKCA 135, 343 Sask R 235 R v Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64, [2015] 3 SCR 1089 R v Leroux, 2015 SKCA 48, 460 Sask R 1 R v Lewko, 2002 SKCA 121, [2003] 2 WWR 197, 227 Sask R 77, 169 CCC (3d) 359 R v Lo......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Criminal Appeals: A Practitioner's Handbook
    • May 2, 2017
    ...15, 16, 127, 130 Labadie, R v , 2011 ONCA 227, 275 CCC (3d) 75 .................................. 12 Lacasse, R v , 2015 SCC 64, [2015] 3 SCR 1089 ................................ 86, 97 272 Table of Cases Lagace, R v , 2003 CanLII 30886, 181 CCC (3d) 12 (Ont CA) ....................... 38 ......
  • IPEELEE AND THE DUTY TO RESIST.
    • Canada
    • August 1, 2018
    ...at para 37; Safarzadeh-Markhali, supra note 32 at para 70. (98) R v ProuLx, [2000] 1 SCR 61, 140 CCC (3d) 449 at paras 81-83; R v Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64, [2015] 3 SCR 1089 at para 12; "the sevet ity of a sentence depends not only on the seriousness of the crime's consequences, but also on the......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT