R. v. Lahaie

JurisdictionOntario
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
JudgeWatt, Huscroft and Jamal JJ.A.
Citation2019 ONCA 899
Docket NumberC57695; C57696
Date14 November 2019

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 11 – November 15, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 22, 2019
    ...80, R. v. Sinclair, 2011 SCC 40, R. v. Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33, R. v. Jackson, [2007] 3 S.C.R. 514, R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64 R. v. L., 2019 ONCA 899 Keywords: Criminal Law, Unlawful Confinement, Defences, Consent, Jury Trials, Jury Instructions, Criminal Code, ss. 279, 494(1), 494(3), R. ......
  • R. v. Downey
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • October 6, 2022
    ...not consent to being confined. [128] In support, Daniel relies on R. v. Gough (1985), 18 C.C.C. (3d) 453 (Ont. C.A.) and R. v. Lahaie, 2019 ONCA 899, for the proposition that a trier of fact must be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt the complainant did not consent to the confinement or ki......
1 cases
  • R. v. Downey
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • October 6, 2022
    ...not consent to being confined. [128] In support, Daniel relies on R. v. Gough (1985), 18 C.C.C. (3d) 453 (Ont. C.A.) and R. v. Lahaie, 2019 ONCA 899, for the proposition that a trier of fact must be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt the complainant did not consent to the confinement or ki......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 11 – November 15, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 22, 2019
    ...80, R. v. Sinclair, 2011 SCC 40, R. v. Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33, R. v. Jackson, [2007] 3 S.C.R. 514, R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64 R. v. L., 2019 ONCA 899 Keywords: Criminal Law, Unlawful Confinement, Defences, Consent, Jury Trials, Jury Instructions, Criminal Code, ss. 279, 494(1), 494(3), R. ......