R. v. Lance, 2018 BCSC 1695
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice Ker |
| Citation | 2018 BCSC 1695 |
| Date | 02 October 2018 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 44314 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
R. v. White,
...the arrested person must be given sufficient information to understand the nature and extent of his or her jeopardy: R. v. Lance, 2018 BCSC 1695 at para. 50. [30] There is no hard and fast rule as to exactly how much information must be given to an a......
-
R. v. Lance, 2018 BCSC 1883
...set out in my reasons for conviction which were given on June 22, 2018 and also in my ruling on the statement voir dire indexed at 2018 BCSC 1695. Nevertheless, it will be useful here to summarize briefly the matter for which Mr. Lance is to be [5] &#x......
-
R. v. B.J.,
...The Grant analysis was summarized by Madam Justice Ker in R. v. Hendrickson, 2018 BCSC 343 and R. v. Lance, 2018 BCSC 1695. In Lance, she found that although the statement was voluntary, it was inadmissible due to breaches of the accused’s ss. 10(a) and 10(b) Analysis of the Grant Fa......
3 cases
-
R. v. White,
...the arrested person must be given sufficient information to understand the nature and extent of his or her jeopardy: R. v. Lance, 2018 BCSC 1695 at para. 50. [30] There is no hard and fast rule as to exactly how much information must be given to an a......
-
R. v. Lance, 2018 BCSC 1883
...set out in my reasons for conviction which were given on June 22, 2018 and also in my ruling on the statement voir dire indexed at 2018 BCSC 1695. Nevertheless, it will be useful here to summarize briefly the matter for which Mr. Lance is to be [5] &#x......
-
R. v. B.J.,
...The Grant analysis was summarized by Madam Justice Ker in R. v. Hendrickson, 2018 BCSC 343 and R. v. Lance, 2018 BCSC 1695. In Lance, she found that although the statement was voluntary, it was inadmissible due to breaches of the accused’s ss. 10(a) and 10(b) Analysis of the Grant Fa......