R v Law, 2020 ABCA 267
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Patricia Rowbotham,The Honourable Madam Justice Elizabeth Hughes,The Honourable Mr. Justice Kevin Feehan |
| Citation | 2020 ABCA 267 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Docket Number | 1801-0230-A |
| Date | 17 July 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
R v Santos,
...SKCA 52 at para 77, 438 Sask R 78; R v Lotfy, 2017 BCCA 418 at para 35, 357 CCC (3d) 516; R v Brayton, 2021 ABCA 316 at para 27; R v Law, 2020 ABCA 267 at para (j) While the training and experience of the arresting offi......
-
R v Shivak, 2020 ABQB 499
...– subjective grounds justifiable on an objective basis, but not requiring a prima facie case for conviction:” Ha at para 35; R v Law, 2020 ABCA 267 at para 27. Neither does the standard approach “the more likely-than-not point on the scale of certainty:” Ha at para [114] Reasonable grounds ......
-
R v Strathdee, 2020 ABCA 306
...The defence has the right to contend that the verdict was unreasonable or cannot be supported by the evidence: RP at para 9; R v Law, 2020 ABCA 267 at para 53. Or that the trial judge’s reasons reveal that the trial judge lost track of the proper allocation of the burden of proof as reflect......
3 cases
-
R v Santos,
...SKCA 52 at para 77, 438 Sask R 78; R v Lotfy, 2017 BCCA 418 at para 35, 357 CCC (3d) 516; R v Brayton, 2021 ABCA 316 at para 27; R v Law, 2020 ABCA 267 at para (j) While the training and experience of the arresting offi......
-
R v Shivak, 2020 ABQB 499
...– subjective grounds justifiable on an objective basis, but not requiring a prima facie case for conviction:” Ha at para 35; R v Law, 2020 ABCA 267 at para 27. Neither does the standard approach “the more likely-than-not point on the scale of certainty:” Ha at para [114] Reasonable grounds ......
-
R v Strathdee, 2020 ABCA 306
...The defence has the right to contend that the verdict was unreasonable or cannot be supported by the evidence: RP at para 9; R v Law, 2020 ABCA 267 at para 53. Or that the trial judge’s reasons reveal that the trial judge lost track of the proper allocation of the burden of proof as reflect......