R v Lawrence, 2020 ABCA 268

JudgeThe Honourable Madam Justice Ritu Khullar,The Honourable Madam Justice Dawn Pentelechuk,The Honourable Mr. Justice Kevin Feehan
Citation2020 ABCA 268
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Date17 July 2020
Docket Number2003-0037-A
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
30 practice notes
  • R. v. Barrett,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • December 3, 2020
    ...2020 BCCA 116; R. v. Youvarajah, 2013 SCC 41; R. v. Tsekouras, 2017 ONCA 290; R. v. Potter; R. v. Colpitts, 2020 NSCA 9; R. v. Lawrence, 2020 ABCA 268; R. v. Chretien, 2014 ONCA 403; R. v. Barrett, 2016 NSSC 43; R. v. Khelawon, 2006 SCC 57; R. v. Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35; R. v. Hall, 2018 MBCA......
  • R v Mela,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 3, 2021
    ...2017 ABCA 421 at paras 15-19, [2017] AJ No 1349 (QL) and R v Hornby, 2018 ABCA 377 at paras 22-25, 368 CCC (3d) 372 and R v Lawrence, 2020 ABCA 268 at paras 27-33, 11 Alta LR (7th) 1. However, the overriding concept of relevance still applies. What is said to be confirmatory evidence for a ......
  • R v Lachance,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • April 25, 2023
    ...403 at paras 44–45, 309 CCC (3d) 418; R v Dirie, 2022 ONCA 767; R v Potter, 2020 NSCA 9 at para 518, 385 CCC (3d) 1; R v Lawrence, 2020 ABCA 268 at para 14; R v Androsoff, 2023 SKCA 42. These cases reflect the fact that the assessment of necessity and reliability is case-specific and......
  • R v Mavros, 2020 ABCA 436
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • December 7, 2020
    ...this assessment. A trial is either conducted fairly or it is not: R v Schmaltz, 2015 ABCA 4, para 13, 320 CCC (3d) 159: R v Lawrence, 2020 ABCA 268, para 13. Where an irregularity in the context of the trial “was severe enough to render the trial unfair or create the appearance of un......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
30 cases
  • R. v. Barrett,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • December 3, 2020
    ...2020 BCCA 116; R. v. Youvarajah, 2013 SCC 41; R. v. Tsekouras, 2017 ONCA 290; R. v. Potter; R. v. Colpitts, 2020 NSCA 9; R. v. Lawrence, 2020 ABCA 268; R. v. Chretien, 2014 ONCA 403; R. v. Barrett, 2016 NSSC 43; R. v. Khelawon, 2006 SCC 57; R. v. Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35; R. v. Hall, 2018 MBCA......
  • R v Mela,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 3, 2021
    ...2017 ABCA 421 at paras 15-19, [2017] AJ No 1349 (QL) and R v Hornby, 2018 ABCA 377 at paras 22-25, 368 CCC (3d) 372 and R v Lawrence, 2020 ABCA 268 at paras 27-33, 11 Alta LR (7th) 1. However, the overriding concept of relevance still applies. What is said to be confirmatory evidence for a ......
  • R v Lachance,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • April 25, 2023
    ...403 at paras 44–45, 309 CCC (3d) 418; R v Dirie, 2022 ONCA 767; R v Potter, 2020 NSCA 9 at para 518, 385 CCC (3d) 1; R v Lawrence, 2020 ABCA 268 at para 14; R v Androsoff, 2023 SKCA 42. These cases reflect the fact that the assessment of necessity and reliability is case-specific and......
  • R v Mavros, 2020 ABCA 436
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • December 7, 2020
    ...this assessment. A trial is either conducted fairly or it is not: R v Schmaltz, 2015 ABCA 4, para 13, 320 CCC (3d) 159: R v Lawrence, 2020 ABCA 268, para 13. Where an irregularity in the context of the trial “was severe enough to render the trial unfair or create the appearance of un......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT