R v Ledesma
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Gates |
| Citation | 2019 ABQB 204 |
| Docket Number | 120236339Q1 |
| Date | 22 March 2019 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
8 practice notes
-
R v Boucher
...of the jury. 158 The parole eligibility is unique to murder but is nevertheless part of the sentence imposed: R v Ledesma, 2019 ABQB 204 at para 34 [ Ledesma 2019]. The factors I must regard in deciding whether to elevate parole ineligibility over the minimum ten years align with sentencing......
-
R v Kemp
...to Soosay and Gagnon – which I have reviewed at length above – counsel for the Offender put forward the following cases: 79 R v Ledesma, 2019 ABQB 204 – Parole ineligibility period of 12 years imposed. The accused and co-accused attended a pub where they hoped to steal drugs and money. They......
-
R v Sinclair, 2019 ABQB 652
...left the premises and walked several kilometers to his workplace where he was eventually apprehended. Applicable law [11] In R v Ledesma 2019 ABQB 204, at paras 24-34, Gates J summarized the law applying to parole ineligibility as Sentencing Principles Relating to Second Degree Murder [24] ......
-
R v Soosay, 2021 ABQB 507
...That is not an aggravating factor. In the circumstances, this simply points to the absence of a mitigating factor. See R v Ledesma, 2019 ABQB 204, Gates J at para 74; R v Wowk, 2020 ABCA 119 at paras 23 and [97]        As regards this factor, I accept Defe......
Get Started for Free
11 cases
-
R v. Boucher
...of the jury. [158] The parole eligibility is unique to murder but is nevertheless part of the sentence imposed: R v Ledesma, 2019 ABQB 204 at para 34 [Ledesma 2019]. The factors I must regard in deciding whether to elevate parole ineligibility over the minimum ten years align with sentencin......
-
R v Dodgson and Holloway
...a period of parole eligibility of greater than 10 but no more than 25 years. [78] As recently confirmed by this Court in R v Ledesma, 2019 ABQB 204 (“Ledesma 2019”), the fixing of the period of parole ineligibility is part of the punishment for second-degree murder and, accordingly, forms a......
-
R v. Kemp
...Soosay and Gagnon – which I have reviewed at length above – counsel for the Offender put forward the following cases: [79] R v Ledesma, 2019 ABQB 204 – Parole ineligibility period of 12 years imposed. The accused and co-accused attended a pub where they hoped to steal drugs and money. They ......
-
R v Sinclair
...left the premises and walked several kilometers to his workplace where he was eventually apprehended. Applicable law [11] In R v Ledesma 2019 ABQB 204, at paras 24-34, Gates J summarized the law applying to parole ineligibility as Sentencing Principles Relating to Second Degree Murder [24] ......
Get Started for Free
