R v Ledesma, 2020 ABCA 194
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice Patricia Rowbotham |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Case Date | Monday May 11, 2020 |
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Citations | 2020 ABCA 194 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 practice notes
-
R v PO, 2020 ABQB 355
...the custody of the state were ignored.” [39] Numerous cases have discussed the effects of the Pandemic in the bail context: R v Ledesma, 2020 ABCA 194; GTB; R v CKT, 2020 ABQB 261; R v SAH, 2020 ABQB 264; R v Nelson, 2020 ONSC 1728; R v JS, 2020 ONSC 1710; R v CJ, 2020 ONSC 1933; R v TK, 20......
-
R. v. B. T. D.,
...C. The new evidence must therefore be significant.” [36] The Crown relies upon cases that articulate reasoning such as in R v Ledesma, 2020 ABCA 194 (May 11, 2020). In summary, its reasons offer an alternative to the trend in Ontario – namely, that for an offender to claim the Covid 19 circ......
-
R v DH, 2020 ABQB 358
...albeit in the context of an application for release pending appeal, rather than pending trial, as in Mr. H.’s case. In R v Ledesma, 2020 ABCA 194, the Court observed that Canadian jurisprudence is not consistent in relation to this issue. The Court observed that there were cases in which co......
-
R v Vander Leeuw, 2020 ABCA 293
...call into question the validity of the reasons for the earlier detention: R v Ledesma, 2019 ABCA 60 at para 44 and R v Ledesma, 2020 ABCA 194 at para 14 [Ledesma 2020]. It is preferable that a fresh application for release be made to the judge who heard the original application: R v D’Agost......
Get Started for Free
7 cases
-
R v PO, 2020 ABQB 355
...the custody of the state were ignored.” [39] Numerous cases have discussed the effects of the Pandemic in the bail context: R v Ledesma, 2020 ABCA 194; GTB; R v CKT, 2020 ABQB 261; R v SAH, 2020 ABQB 264; R v Nelson, 2020 ONSC 1728; R v JS, 2020 ONSC 1710; R v CJ, 2020 ONSC 1933; R v TK, 20......
-
R. v. B. T. D.
...C. The new evidence must therefore be significant.” [36] The Crown relies upon cases that articulate reasoning such as in R v Ledesma, 2020 ABCA 194 (May 11, 2020). In summary, its reasons offer an alternative to the trend in Ontario – namely, that for an offender to claim the Covid 19 circ......
-
R v DH, 2020 ABQB 358
...albeit in the context of an application for release pending appeal, rather than pending trial, as in Mr. H.’s case. In R v Ledesma, 2020 ABCA 194, the Court observed that Canadian jurisprudence is not consistent in relation to this issue. The Court observed that there were cases in which co......
-
R v Wollach, 2021 ABCA 251
...a material change in circumstances that entitles him to have his release revisited: R v St-Cloud, 2015 SCC 27 at para 121, R v Ledesma, 2020 ABCA 194 at para 5. He further submits the delay alters the balance of reviewability and enforceability, as explained in R v Oland, 2017 SCC 17, and t......
Get Started for Free