R v Lichtenwald, 2020 SKCA 70
| Judge | Ottenbreit, Schwann and Barrington-Foote JJ.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Case Date | June 10, 2020 |
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Citations | 2020 SKCA 70 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
27 practice notes
-
R. v. Tim, 2022 SCC 12
...2014 SCC 54, [2014] 2 S.C.R. 689; R. v. Goldhart, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 463; R. v. Pino, 2016 ONCA 389, 130 O.R. (3d) 561; R. v. Lichtenwald, 2020 SKCA 70, 388 C.C.C. (3d) 377; R. v. Reilly, 2020 BCCA 369, 397 C.C.C. (3d) 219, aff’d 2021 SCC 38; R. v. Harrison, 2009 SCC 34, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 494; R......
-
Strom v. Saskatchewan Registered Nurses’ Association, 2020 SKCA 112
...the standard of review that should be applied to the constitutional ground is correctness. I agree. As this Court said in R v Lichtenwald, 2020 SKCA 70 at para 22, 388 CCC (3d) 377, issues as to the scope and application of a Charter right raise questions of law on appeal, reviewable on the......
-
R v K.D.S.,
...Standard of review [62] Recently, in R v Lichtenwald, 2020 SKCA 70, 388 CCC (3d) 377 [Lichtenwald], Barrington-Foote J.A. indicated that “[i]ssues as to the scope and application of a Charter right raise questions of law, reviewable on a corr......
-
R v Steadman,
...as the question of what are the elements of the Charter definition, are questions of law reviewed for correctness: see eg R v Lichtenwald, 2020 SKCA 70 at para 22, 388 CCC (3d) 377. [50] In this case, the trial judge’s impactive fact findings are entitled to deference. That deference is sin......
Request a trial to view additional results
27 cases
-
R. v. Tim, 2022 SCC 12
...2014 SCC 54, [2014] 2 S.C.R. 689; R. v. Goldhart, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 463; R. v. Pino, 2016 ONCA 389, 130 O.R. (3d) 561; R. v. Lichtenwald, 2020 SKCA 70, 388 C.C.C. (3d) 377; R. v. Reilly, 2020 BCCA 369, 397 C.C.C. (3d) 219, aff’d 2021 SCC 38; R. v. Harrison, 2009 SCC 34, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 494; R......
-
Strom v. Saskatchewan Registered Nurses’ Association, 2020 SKCA 112
...the standard of review that should be applied to the constitutional ground is correctness. I agree. As this Court said in R v Lichtenwald, 2020 SKCA 70 at para 22, 388 CCC (3d) 377, issues as to the scope and application of a Charter right raise questions of law on appeal, reviewable on the......
-
R v K.D.S.,
...Standard of review [62] Recently, in R v Lichtenwald, 2020 SKCA 70, 388 CCC (3d) 377 [Lichtenwald], Barrington-Foote J.A. indicated that “[i]ssues as to the scope and application of a Charter right raise questions of law, reviewable on a corr......
-
R v Steadman,
...as the question of what are the elements of the Charter definition, are questions of law reviewed for correctness: see eg R v Lichtenwald, 2020 SKCA 70 at para 22, 388 CCC (3d) 377. [50] In this case, the trial judge’s impactive fact findings are entitled to deference. That deference is sin......
Request a trial to view additional results