R. v. Linton
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada) |
| Judge | Schwarzl |
| Citation | 2022 ONCJ 197 |
| Docket Number | 0611-998-19-1139 |
| Date | 27 April 2022 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
R v Al Jalmoud
...He remained at the scene and co-operated with the police. There was significant evidence of good character. • In Regina v. Linton, 2022 ONCJ 197, after what was described as an uncontested trial necessitated by the offender's inability to remember anything about what had happened with respe......
-
R v Kotula
...very broad, ranging from conditional sentences (see e.g., R. v. Ryazanov, 2008 ONCA 667; R. v. Christink, 2010 ONSC 2396; R. v. Linton, 2022 ONCJ 197; R. v. Hutchinson, 2022 ONCJ 276; R. v. He, 2022 ONSC 2100, R. v. Paul, 2022 ONCJ 102) to lengthy penitentiary sentences (see e.g., R. v. Bou......
-
R v Georgopoulos
...[2018] O.J. No. 2061 (C.J.). R. v. Markozashvili, 2010 ONCA 52. R. v. Ryazanov, 2008 ONCA 667. R. v. Creft, 2022 ONCJ 572. R. v. Linton, 2022 ONCJ 197. R. v. Beedawia, 2024 ONSC 3247. 55 R. v. Coholic is an Ontario Court of Justice (“OCJ”) decision (as are Whalen, Creft, and Linton) and not......
3 cases
-
R v Al Jalmoud
...He remained at the scene and co-operated with the police. There was significant evidence of good character. • In Regina v. Linton, 2022 ONCJ 197, after what was described as an uncontested trial necessitated by the offender's inability to remember anything about what had happened with respe......
-
R v Kotula
...very broad, ranging from conditional sentences (see e.g., R. v. Ryazanov, 2008 ONCA 667; R. v. Christink, 2010 ONSC 2396; R. v. Linton, 2022 ONCJ 197; R. v. Hutchinson, 2022 ONCJ 276; R. v. He, 2022 ONSC 2100, R. v. Paul, 2022 ONCJ 102) to lengthy penitentiary sentences (see e.g., R. v. Bou......
-
R v Georgopoulos
...[2018] O.J. No. 2061 (C.J.). R. v. Markozashvili, 2010 ONCA 52. R. v. Ryazanov, 2008 ONCA 667. R. v. Creft, 2022 ONCJ 572. R. v. Linton, 2022 ONCJ 197. R. v. Beedawia, 2024 ONSC 3247. 55 R. v. Coholic is an Ontario Court of Justice (“OCJ”) decision (as are Whalen, Creft, and Linton) and not......