R. v. Liu (P.T.) et al., 2011 BCSC 1269
| Judge | Romilly, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Case Date | September 23, 2011 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | 2011 BCSC 1269;[2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1269;[2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1269 (SC) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 practice notes
-
R. v. Khosravi, 2018 BCSC 2163
...1909 at para. 17. [49] The Crown must also prove that the possession of the cocaine was for the purpose of trafficking: see R. v. Liu, 2011 BCSC 1269 at paras. 17, 30-35; R. v. Chan (2003), 66 O.R. (3d) 577 (C.A.) at paras. [50] “Traffic” is defined in s. 2(1) of the CDSA as follows: traffi......
-
R. v. Bathie,
...Beyond possession, the Crown must prove that the possession of the drugs was for the purpose of trafficking: R. v. Liu, 2011 BCSC 1269 at paras. 17, 30-35; R. v. Chan (2003), 66 O.R. (3d) 577 (C.A.) at paras. 27-35; CDSA, s. 2(1). However, this element was......
-
R. v. Huang (S.S.) et al., [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2237 (SC)
...of guilt: R. v. Jackson , 2007 SCC 52 at paras. 3, 9, and R. v. Sylvestre and Dunlop , [1979] 2 S.C.R. 881, both cited in R. v. Liu , 2011 BCSC 1269 at paras. 28-29; ∙ in some cases, in the absence of a credible explanation, an inference of knowledge may properly be drawn from the circumsta......
-
R. v. Karaim,
...the accused possessed the prohibited drugs for the purpose of trafficking: R. v. Lukianchuk, 2001 BCSC 119, at para. 43; R v. Liu, 2011 BCSC 1269, at para. 17. Under CDSA section 2, “traffic” is defined to traffic means, in respect of a substance included in a......
Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
-
R. v. Khosravi, 2018 BCSC 2163
...1909 at para. 17. [49] The Crown must also prove that the possession of the cocaine was for the purpose of trafficking: see R. v. Liu, 2011 BCSC 1269 at paras. 17, 30-35; R. v. Chan (2003), 66 O.R. (3d) 577 (C.A.) at paras. [50] “Traffic” is defined in s. 2(1) of the CDSA as follows: traffi......
-
R. v. Bathie,
...Beyond possession, the Crown must prove that the possession of the drugs was for the purpose of trafficking: R. v. Liu, 2011 BCSC 1269 at paras. 17, 30-35; R. v. Chan (2003), 66 O.R. (3d) 577 (C.A.) at paras. 27-35; CDSA, s. 2(1). However, this element was......
-
R. v. Huang (S.S.) et al., [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2237 (SC)
...of guilt: R. v. Jackson , 2007 SCC 52 at paras. 3, 9, and R. v. Sylvestre and Dunlop , [1979] 2 S.C.R. 881, both cited in R. v. Liu , 2011 BCSC 1269 at paras. 28-29; ∙ in some cases, in the absence of a credible explanation, an inference of knowledge may properly be drawn from the circumsta......
-
R. v. Karaim,
...the accused possessed the prohibited drugs for the purpose of trafficking: R. v. Lukianchuk, 2001 BCSC 119, at para. 43; R v. Liu, 2011 BCSC 1269, at para. 17. Under CDSA section 2, “traffic” is defined to traffic means, in respect of a substance included in a......
Request a trial to view additional results