R. v. Lohrer (A.W.), 2004 SCC 80
Judge | Bastarache, Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella and Charron, JJ. |
Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
Case Date | December 10, 2004 |
Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
Citations | 2004 SCC 80;(2004), 329 N.R. 1 (SCC);2004 SCC 82;[2004] 3 SCR 760 |
R. v. Lohrer (A.W.) (2004), 329 N.R. 1 (SCC)
MLB headnote and full text
[French language version follows English language version]
[La version française vient à la suite de la version anglaise]
....................
Temp. Cite: [2004] N.R. TBEd. DE.045
Allan Wayne Lohrer (appellant) v. Her Majesty The Queen (respondent)
(30160; 2004 SCC 80)
Indexed As: R. v. Lohrer (A.W.)
Supreme Court of Canada
Bastarache, Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella and Charron, JJ.
December 10, 2004.
Summary:
The accused was charged with the aggravated assault of C and H, with uttering threats to C and H and their families, and with using a weapon during the assault. The accused was convicted of the aggravated assault of C, assault causing bodily harm of H and uttering threats to C and H and their families. The accused appealed from conviction, submitting, inter alia, that the trial judge misapprehended material evidence.
The British Columbia Court of Appeal, Hollinrake, J.A., dissenting, in a judgment reported (2003), 186 B.C.A.C. 58; 306 W.A.C. 58, dismissed the appeal. The accused appealed.
The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the appeal. There was no misapprehension of evidence going to substance, rather than just detail. The alleged errors did not play an essential part in the reasoning process resulting in conviction. There was no error in appreciating the evidence that could have affected the outcome (no miscarriage of justice even if errors committed).
Criminal Law - Topic 4852
Appeals - Indictable offences - Grounds of appeal - Miscarriage of justice - An accused appealed his convictions on the ground that, inter alia, the trial judge misapprehended material evidence - The Supreme Court of Canada, in affirming dismissal of the accused's conviction appeal, stated that "the misapprehension of the evidence must go to the substance rather than to the detail. It must be material rather than peripheral to the reasoning of the trial judge. Once those hurdles are surmounted, there is the further hurdle ... that the errors thus identified must play an essential part not just in the narrative of the judgment but 'in the reasoning process resulting in a conviction'. ... In our view, none of the errors urged by the appellant goes to 'the substance of material parts' of the evidence that bears on an 'essential part in the reasoning process' of the trial judge leading to the convictions." - There was no error "in his appreciation of the evidence in a manner that could have affected the outcome" - See paragraphs 1 to 11.
Criminal Law - Topic 4957
Appeals - Indictable offences - New trials -Grounds - Misapprehension of evidence - [See Criminal Law - Topic 4852 ].
Criminal Law - Topic 5020
Appeals - Indictable offences - Setting aside verdicts - Verdict unreasonable or unsupported by evidence - [See Criminal Law - Topic 4852].
Criminal Law - Topic 5035
Appeals - Indictable offences - Dismissal of appeal if no prejudice, substantial wrong or miscarriage results - General - [See Criminal Law - Topic 4852 ].
Cases Noticed:
R. v. Morrissey (R.J.) (1995), 80 O.A.C. 161; 97 C.C.C.(3d) 193 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 1].
R. v. R.C. (1992), 49 Q.A.C. 37; 81 C.C.C.(3d) 417 (C.A.), revd. [1993] 2 S.C.R. 226; 153 N.R. 241; 55 Q.A.C. 63, refd to. [para. 8].
Counsel:
Shawn P. Buckley, for the appellant;
Kenneth Madsen, for the respondent.
Solicitors of Record:
None disclosed.
This appeal was heard on December 10, 2004, before Bastarache, Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella and Charron, JJ., of the Supreme Court of Canada.
On December 10, 2004, Binnie, J., delivered the following judgment orally in both official languages for the Supreme Court of Canada.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
R. v. Barros (R.), 2010 ABCA 116
...1 S.C.R. 381; 252 N.R. 204; 134 B.C.A.C. 161; 219 W.A.C. 161; 2000 SCC 15, refd to. [para. 27]. R. v. Lohrer (A.W.), [2004] 3 S.C.R. 732; 329 N.R. 1; 208 B.C.A.C. 1; 344 W.A.C. 1; 2004 SCC 80, refd to. [para. 27]. R. v. Morrissey (R.J.) (1995), 80 O.A.C. 161; 97 C.C.C.(3d) 193; 22 O.R.(3d) ......
-
R. v. Courtoreille (D.A.) et al., (2007) 247 B.C.A.C. 166 (CA)
...(1994), 165 N.R. 374; 42 B.C.A.C. 161; 67 W.A.C. 161; 89 C.C.C.(3d) 193 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 23]. R. v. Lohrer, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 732; 329 N.R. 1; 208 B.C.A.C. 1; 344 W.A.C. 1; 2004 SCC 80, refd to. [para. R. v. Logan, Logan and Johnson, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 731; 112 N.R. 144; 41 O.A.C. 330; ......
-
R. v. McKinnon (N.L.) et al.,
...869; 284 N.R. 342; 211 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 50; 633 A.P.R. 50; 2002 SCC 26, refd to. [para. 111]. R. v. Lohrer (A.W.), [2004] 3 S.C.R. 732; 329 N.R. 1; 208 B.C.A.C. 1; 344 W.A.C. 1; 2004 SCC 80, refd to. [para. R. v. Mezzo, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 802; 68 N.R. 1; 43 Man.R.(2d) 161, refd to. [para. ......
-
R. v. D.N.S., (2016) 326 Man.R.(2d) 153 (CA)
...refd to. [para. 19]. R. v. Morrissey (R.J.) (1995), 80 O.A.C. 161 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 19]. R. v. Lohrer (A.W.), [2004] 3 S.C.R. 732; 329 N.R. 1; 208 B.C.A.C. 1; 344 W.A.C. 1; 2004 SCC 80, refd to. [para. 19]. R. v. Lang (P.), [2011] O.T.C. Uned. 3822; 2011 ONSC 3822, refd to. [para. 19]......
-
R. v. Barros (R.), 2010 ABCA 116
...1 S.C.R. 381; 252 N.R. 204; 134 B.C.A.C. 161; 219 W.A.C. 161; 2000 SCC 15, refd to. [para. 27]. R. v. Lohrer (A.W.), [2004] 3 S.C.R. 732; 329 N.R. 1; 208 B.C.A.C. 1; 344 W.A.C. 1; 2004 SCC 80, refd to. [para. 27]. R. v. Morrissey (R.J.) (1995), 80 O.A.C. 161; 97 C.C.C.(3d) 193; 22 O.R.(3d) ......
-
R. v. Courtoreille (D.A.) et al., (2007) 247 B.C.A.C. 166 (CA)
...(1994), 165 N.R. 374; 42 B.C.A.C. 161; 67 W.A.C. 161; 89 C.C.C.(3d) 193 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 23]. R. v. Lohrer, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 732; 329 N.R. 1; 208 B.C.A.C. 1; 344 W.A.C. 1; 2004 SCC 80, refd to. [para. R. v. Logan, Logan and Johnson, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 731; 112 N.R. 144; 41 O.A.C. 330; ......
-
R. v. D.N.S., (2016) 326 Man.R.(2d) 153 (CA)
...refd to. [para. 19]. R. v. Morrissey (R.J.) (1995), 80 O.A.C. 161 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 19]. R. v. Lohrer (A.W.), [2004] 3 S.C.R. 732; 329 N.R. 1; 208 B.C.A.C. 1; 344 W.A.C. 1; 2004 SCC 80, refd to. [para. 19]. R. v. Lang (P.), [2011] O.T.C. Uned. 3822; 2011 ONSC 3822, refd to. [para. 19]......
-
R. v. McKinnon (N.L.) et al.,
...869; 284 N.R. 342; 211 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 50; 633 A.P.R. 50; 2002 SCC 26, refd to. [para. 111]. R. v. Lohrer (A.W.), [2004] 3 S.C.R. 732; 329 N.R. 1; 208 B.C.A.C. 1; 344 W.A.C. 1; 2004 SCC 80, refd to. [para. R. v. Mezzo, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 802; 68 N.R. 1; 43 Man.R.(2d) 161, refd to. [para. ......
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 8 12, 2019)
...2017 ONCA 923; R. v. Howe (2005), 192 C.C.C. (3d) 480 (Ont. C.A.); R. v. Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1000; R. v. Lohrer, 2004 SCC 80 v. Bhagwandat , 2019 ONCA 589 Keywords: Appeal Book Endorsement, Mental Disorder, Unequivocal Plea v. Dean, 2019 ONCA 587 Keywords: Appeal Book E......
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (December 14 ' December 18, 2020)
...2015 SCC 10, Persaud v Telus Corporation, 2017 ONCA 479, Belton v Liberty Insurance Co. of Canada (2004), 72 OR (3d) 81 (CA), R v Lohrer, 2004 SCC 80, Martin v Goldfarb (1990), 41 OR (3d) 161 (CA), leave to appeal refused, [1998] SCCA No. 516, Ruston v Keddco Mfg. (2011) Ltd., 2018 ONSC 291......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 11 November 15, 2019)
...Criminal Law, Attempting to Possess Heroin for the Purpose of Trafficking, Mens Rea, Sentencing, Criminal Code, s. 718.1, R. v. Lohrer, 2004 SCC 80, R. v. Sinclair, 2011 SCC 40, R. v. Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33, R. v. Jackson, [2007] 3 S.C.R. 514, R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64 R. v. L., 2019 ONCA......
-
BLANEY’S APPEALS: ONTARIO COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (APRIL 22 – 26, 2019)
...(1893), 6 R 67 (HL), R v Quansah, 2015 ONCA 237, leave to appeal to SCC refused, [2016] SCCA No 203, R v Jolivet, 2000 SCC 29, R v Lohrer, 2004 SCC 80, R v B(AR) (1998), 41 OR (3d) 361 (CA), affirmed 2000 SCC 30 R v Lall, 2019 ONCA 317 Keywords: Criminal Law, Robbery, Evidence, Information ......
-
Table of Cases
...R v Loewen, 2010 ABCA 255, aff’d 2011 SCC 21 .............................................. 2, 139 R v Lohrer, 2004 SCC 80 ...................................................................................331 R v Lovie (1995), 100 CCC (3d) 68 (Ont CA) ............................................
-
Appeals
...that the error by itself must have led to any unfairness or prejudice; that is only an 52 Morrissey , above note 21. 53 R v Lohrer , 2004 SCC 80 at para 1 [ Lohrer ]. 54 R v Khan , 2001 SCC 86 at para 22 [ Khan ]. Appeals 575 issue at the curative proviso stage. 55 So, for example, whether ......
-
Table of cases
...319 R v Loewen, 2018 SKCA 69, [2018] 12 WWR 280, 365 CCC (3d) 91 ............... 242 R v Lohrer, 2004 SCC 80 ..................................................................... 574, 576, 577 R v Lord, 2011 BCCA 295 ................................................................................
-
Table of Cases
...114 R. v. Liverpool Crown Court; Ex parte Roberts, [1986] Crim. L.R. 622 ....................... 182 R. v. Lohrer, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 732, 2004 SCC 80 ........................................................... 105 R. v. M(S), 1991 WL 1139467 (Ont. Prov. Div.) .......................................