R v Lugela, 2019 ABQB 128

JudgeYamauchi
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Case DateMarch 11, 2019
JurisdictionAlberta
Citations2019 ABQB 128
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • R v Lugela, 2020 ABCA 348
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 30 Septiembre 2020
    ...Memorandum of Judgment Appeal from the Conviction by The Honourable Mr. Justice K.D. Yamauchi Convicted on the 11th day of March, 2019 (2019 ABQB 128, Docket: _______________________________________________________ Memorandum of Judgment _____________________________________________________......
  • R v Lugela,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 17 Enero 2022
    ...did not err in failing to consider the Appellant’s intoxication as a mitigating factor. In his reasons for conviction (R v Lugela, 2019 ABQB 128; appeal dismissed R v Lugela, 2020 ABCA 348) the trial judge rejected the Appellant’s defence that he was in a state of “adva......
  • R v Lugela,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 5 Junio 2019
    ...after this Court found him guilty of second degree murder in the death of Mylan Hicks. This Court's decision is reported as R v Lugela, 2019 ABQB 128 (the "Conviction II. Background [2] The background which led to this Court finding Mr. Lugela guilty is contained in the Conviction Decision.......
3 cases
  • R v Lugela, 2020 ABCA 348
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 30 Septiembre 2020
    ...Memorandum of Judgment Appeal from the Conviction by The Honourable Mr. Justice K.D. Yamauchi Convicted on the 11th day of March, 2019 (2019 ABQB 128, Docket: _______________________________________________________ Memorandum of Judgment _____________________________________________________......
  • R v Lugela,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 17 Enero 2022
    ...did not err in failing to consider the Appellant’s intoxication as a mitigating factor. In his reasons for conviction (R v Lugela, 2019 ABQB 128; appeal dismissed R v Lugela, 2020 ABCA 348) the trial judge rejected the Appellant’s defence that he was in a state of “adva......
  • R v Lugela,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 5 Junio 2019
    ...after this Court found him guilty of second degree murder in the death of Mylan Hicks. This Court's decision is reported as R v Lugela, 2019 ABQB 128 (the "Conviction II. Background [2] The background which led to this Court finding Mr. Lugela guilty is contained in the Conviction Decision.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT