R. v. M.R.H., 2019 BCCA 39
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Garson,Harris,Savage |
| Citation | 2019 BCCA 39 |
| Date | 05 February 2019 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Docket Number | CA44346 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
R v Church in the Vine and Fortin,
...2020 BCCA 225 at paras 49 – 52, R v Edwardsen, 2019 BCCA 259 at para 62, leave ref’d [2019] SCCA No 337, R v Vickerson, 2019 BCCA 39 at para 61, R v Frederickson, 2018 BCCA 2 at paras 11 – 14, 24, 26, 33, 39; R v Joseph, 2018 BCCA 284 at paras 20 – 25; R v Cody, ......
-
R. v. C.M.M., 2020 BCCA 56
...to the pre‑cubicle events, what happened in the cubicle, or otherwise: R. v. M.R.H., 2019 SCC 46, endorsing the dissenting judgment in 2019 BCCA 39 at paras. 30, 50, 52. The Crown says there is nothing inherently wrong with the judge having a doubt about S.F.’s testimony on the pre‑cubicle ......
-
R. v. F.M., 2020 BCSC 120
...whom to believe, you must acquit. [77] However the C.W.H. instruction is not required in every case turning on credibility: R. v. M.R.H. 2019 BCCA 39, Savage J.A. dissenting at para. 28, appeal allowed, dissenting decision of Savage J.A. affirmed, 2019 SCC 46. [78] The essential requirement......
-
R. v. Russ, 2019 BCCA 455
...them to discard that witness’s testimony in its entirety: R. v. R.J.B., 2016 BCCA 244 at para. 21; R. v. M.R.H., 2019 SCC 46, 2019 BCCA 39. The appellant’s premise, that the jury could only have rejected the complainant’s testimony on the basis that they found her ......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
R v Church in the Vine and Fortin,
...2020 BCCA 225 at paras 49 – 52, R v Edwardsen, 2019 BCCA 259 at para 62, leave ref’d [2019] SCCA No 337, R v Vickerson, 2019 BCCA 39 at para 61, R v Frederickson, 2018 BCCA 2 at paras 11 – 14, 24, 26, 33, 39; R v Joseph, 2018 BCCA 284 at paras 20 – 25; R v Cody, ......
-
R. v. C.M.M., 2020 BCCA 56
...to the pre‑cubicle events, what happened in the cubicle, or otherwise: R. v. M.R.H., 2019 SCC 46, endorsing the dissenting judgment in 2019 BCCA 39 at paras. 30, 50, 52. The Crown says there is nothing inherently wrong with the judge having a doubt about S.F.’s testimony on the pre‑cubicle ......
-
R. v. F.M., 2020 BCSC 120
...whom to believe, you must acquit. [77] However the C.W.H. instruction is not required in every case turning on credibility: R. v. M.R.H. 2019 BCCA 39, Savage J.A. dissenting at para. 28, appeal allowed, dissenting decision of Savage J.A. affirmed, 2019 SCC 46. [78] The essential requirement......
-
R. v. Russ, 2019 BCCA 455
...them to discard that witness’s testimony in its entirety: R. v. R.J.B., 2016 BCCA 244 at para. 21; R. v. M.R.H., 2019 SCC 46, 2019 BCCA 39. The appellant’s premise, that the jury could only have rejected the complainant’s testimony on the basis that they found her ......
Request a trial to view additional results