R. v. Ma (H.),
Judge | McIntyre,Perras,Wittmann |
Neutral Citation | 2003 ABCA 220 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
Date | 26 May 2003 |
Citation | (2003), 330 A.R. 142 (CA),2003 ABCA 220,23 Alta LR (4th) 14,330 AR 142,177 CCC (3d) 535,(2003), 330 AR 142 (CA),330 A.R. 142 |
R. v. Ma (H.) (2003), 330 A.R. 142 (CA);
299 W.A.C. 142
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2003] A.R. TBEd. AU.026
Her Majesty the Queen (appellant) v. Hau Ma (respondent)
(0301-0064-A; 2003 ABCA 220)
Indexed As: R. v. Ma (H.)
Alberta Court of Appeal
Wittmann, J.A., Perras and McIntyre, JJ.(ad hoc)
July 15, 2003.
Summary:
The accused pleaded guilty to possession of cocaine for the purpose of trafficking. The sentencing judge imposed a conditional sentence of two years less a day. The Crown appealed.
The Alberta Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and substituted a sentence of three years' imprisonment.
Criminal Law - Topic 5850
Sentence - Trafficking in a narcotic - Possession for the purpose of trafficking - The accused, aged 19, was a courier in a wholesale commercial trafficking operation - When he was stopped he had 238.2 grams of crack cocaine valued at $23,823 and $985 in his pocket - The accused pleaded guilty to possession of cocaine for the purpose of trafficking - The accused had no prior convictions - His family and his employer were supportive - The Alberta Court of Appeal held that an appropriate sentence was three years' imprisonment - The court noted that crack cocaine was an extremely addictive and costly drug usually leading to crime and prostitution - The accused was a integral and critical part of the drug operation - He was a "middle man" - His motivation was greed - The fact that the accused chose not to be paid a lot of money for his services was not a mitigating factor; it only meant that the operation head's profits were higher.
Cases Noticed:
R. v. Trinh (C.G.) (2000), 266 A.R. 180; 228 W.A.C. 180 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 5].
R. v. Maskill (1981), 29 A.R. 107; 58 C.C.C.(2d) 408 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 5].
R. v. Maskell - see R. v. Maskill.
R. v. Bengert et al. (No. 4) (1979), 52 C.C.C.(2d) 100 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. 5].
R. v. Ostertag (T.K.) (2000), 266 A.R. 57; 228 W.A.C. 57 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 8].
R. v. Rahime (S.) et al. (2001), 286 A.R. 377; 253 W.A.C. 377 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 13].
R. v. Henderson (J.D.) (2002), 313 A.R. 182 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 13].
R. v. Honish and Lafrance (1989), 100 A.R. 79 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 13].
R. v. Proulx (J.K.D.), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 61; 249 N.R. 201; 142 Man.R.(2d) 161; 212 W.A.C. 161; 140 C.C.C.(3d) 449, refd to. [para. 17].
R. v. La (P.K.) (2003), 338 A.R. 39 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 18].
R. v. McClelland (R.W.) (2001), 281 A.R. 378; 248 W.A.C. 378 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 19].
R. v. Skani, [2002] A.J. No. 1579 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 19].
R. v. Brown, [2002] A.J. No. 1479 (Prov. Ct.), refd to. [para. 19].
Counsel:
Robert A. Sigurdson, for the appellant;
Alias Sanders, for the respondent.
This appeal was heard on May 26, 2003, by Wittmann, J.A., Perras and McIntyre, JJ.(ad hoc), of the Alberta Court of Appeal. The court delivered the following memorandum of judgment on July 15, 2003.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
R. v. Parranto,
...BCCA 285, 374 B.C.A.C. 166; R. v. Cunningham (1996), 104 C.C.C. (3d) 542; R. v. Rahime, 2001 ABCA 203, 95 Alta. L.R. (3d) 237; R. v. Ma, 2003 ABCA 220, 23 Alta. L.R. (4th) 14; R. v. Corbiere, 2017 ABCA 164, 53 Alta. L.R. (6th) 1; R. v. Giroux, 2018 ABCA 56, 68 Alta. L.R. (6th) 21; R. v. L’H......
-
R. v. Vigon (D.M.), (2016) 612 A.R. 292
...footnote 6]. R. v. Saeed (A.A.) (2004), 357 A.R. 238; 334 W.A.C. 238; 2004 ABCA 384, refd to. [para. 45, footnote 6]. R. v. Ma (H.) (2003), 330 A.R. 142; 299 W.A.C. 142; 177 C.C.C.(3d) 535; 2003 ABCA 220, refd to. [para. 45, footnote 6]. R. v. Rahime (S.) et al. (2001), 286 A.R. 377; 253 W.......
-
R. v. Gambilla (D.A.) et al., (2015) 604 A.R. 353 (QB)
...260, refd to. [para. 41]. R. v. Lau (W.T.) (2004), 357 A.R. 312; 334 W.A.C. 312; 2004 ABCA 408, refd to. [para. 41]. R. v. Ma (H.) (2003), 330 A.R. 142; 299 W.A.C. 142; 23 Alta. L.R.(4th) 14; 2003 ABCA 220, refd to. [para. R. v. Cirone; R. v. Mothersill (1988), 87 A.R. 222; 43 C.C.C.(3d) 22......
-
R. v. Yakimishyn (B.M.), (2009) 470 A.R. 140 (QB)
...to. [para. 36]. R. v. Hill (W.) (2007), 243 B.C.A.C. 90; 401 W.A.C. 90; 221 C.C.C.(3d) 472 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 36]. R. v. Ma (H.) (2003), 330 A.R. 142; 299 W.A.C. 142; 2003 ABCA 220, refd to. [para. 37]. R. v. Trinh (C.G.) (2000), 266 A.R. 180; 228 W.A.C. 180; 2000 ABCA 231, refd to. [p......
-
R. v. Parranto,
...BCCA 285, 374 B.C.A.C. 166; R. v. Cunningham (1996), 104 C.C.C. (3d) 542; R. v. Rahime, 2001 ABCA 203, 95 Alta. L.R. (3d) 237; R. v. Ma, 2003 ABCA 220, 23 Alta. L.R. (4th) 14; R. v. Corbiere, 2017 ABCA 164, 53 Alta. L.R. (6th) 1; R. v. Giroux, 2018 ABCA 56, 68 Alta. L.R. (6th) 21; R. v. L’H......
-
R. v. Vigon (D.M.), (2016) 612 A.R. 292
...footnote 6]. R. v. Saeed (A.A.) (2004), 357 A.R. 238; 334 W.A.C. 238; 2004 ABCA 384, refd to. [para. 45, footnote 6]. R. v. Ma (H.) (2003), 330 A.R. 142; 299 W.A.C. 142; 177 C.C.C.(3d) 535; 2003 ABCA 220, refd to. [para. 45, footnote 6]. R. v. Rahime (S.) et al. (2001), 286 A.R. 377; 253 W.......
-
R. v. Yakimishyn (B.M.), (2009) 470 A.R. 140 (QB)
...to. [para. 36]. R. v. Hill (W.) (2007), 243 B.C.A.C. 90; 401 W.A.C. 90; 221 C.C.C.(3d) 472 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 36]. R. v. Ma (H.) (2003), 330 A.R. 142; 299 W.A.C. 142; 2003 ABCA 220, refd to. [para. 37]. R. v. Trinh (C.G.) (2000), 266 A.R. 180; 228 W.A.C. 180; 2000 ABCA 231, refd to. [p......
-
R v Gittens, 2019 ABCA 406
...has been commercial trafficking in cocaine; the entire context must be considered: R. v McCulloch, 2011 ABCA 124 at para. 4; R. v Ma, 2003 ABCA 220 at paras. 6-7, 14, 23 Alta LR (4th) 14; R. v Chung, 1993 ABCA 52, 135 AR 351. Further, this argument does not suggest any error in the starting......
-
Digest: R v Mohamed, 2018 SKQB 186
...473 Sask R 212 R v Klyne, 2014 SKQB 62, 439 Sask R 214 R v Lau, 2004 ABCA 408, 357 AR 212 R v Leitner, 2013 SKQB 1, 411 Sask R 79 R v Ma, 2003 ABCA 220, 330 AR 142 R v Maskell, 1981 ABCA 50, 58 CCC (2d) 408 R v McIntyre, 2012 SKCA 111, 405 Sask R 28, 563 WAC 28 R v Mohamed, 2018 SKQB 151 R ......