R. v. Mabior (C.L.), [2012] N.R. TBEd. OC.005

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, C.J.C., LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell, Moldaver and Karakatsanis, JJ.
Subject MatterCRIMINAL LAW,CIVIL RIGHTS
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date05 October 2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Sparks v. Nova Scotia (Assistance Appeal Board), 2017 NSCA 82
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • November 8, 2017
    ...Charter challenge, we should nonetheless interpret ambiguous legislation in a manner that best reflects its values. See R. v. Mabior, [2012] SCC 47 at ¶ 22 and 45. While the appellant and intervenors have highlighted several Charter values at play in this appeal, I will refer to only one, n......
  • R. v. Clarke (G.), 2013 ONSC 3232
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 3, 2013
    ...was sexually assaulted due to his consent being vitiated by fraud. Regarding cases of this nature, the recent case of R. v. Mabior , [2012] SCC 47, outlines the Crown's burden of proof, as follows, at paragraphs 12 and 104: 12 This Court considered "fraud" under s. 265(3)(c) 14 years ago in......
2 cases
  • Sparks v. Nova Scotia (Assistance Appeal Board), 2017 NSCA 82
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • November 8, 2017
    ...Charter challenge, we should nonetheless interpret ambiguous legislation in a manner that best reflects its values. See R. v. Mabior, [2012] SCC 47 at ¶ 22 and 45. While the appellant and intervenors have highlighted several Charter values at play in this appeal, I will refer to only one, n......
  • R. v. Clarke (G.), 2013 ONSC 3232
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 3, 2013
    ...was sexually assaulted due to his consent being vitiated by fraud. Regarding cases of this nature, the recent case of R. v. Mabior , [2012] SCC 47, outlines the Crown's burden of proof, as follows, at paragraphs 12 and 104: 12 This Court considered "fraud" under s. 265(3)(c) 14 years ago in......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT