R. v. MacKenzie, 2020 ONCA 646

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeDoherty, van Rensburg and Trotter JJ.A.
Citation2020 ONCA 646
Date19 October 2020
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Docket NumberC67166
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • R. v. Taylor, 2021 NSSC 120
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 28 Abril 2021
    ...for example, W.R. ; R. v. Mirzadegan, 2019 ONCA 864 (Ont. C.A.) ; and R. v. MacKenzie, 2020 ONCA 646 (Ont. C.A.)1), this court has confirmed that the trier of fact is entitled to consider the absence of evidence of motive to fabricate as one factor in......
  • R. v. S.B.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 17 Diciembre 2021
    ...must not, and does not, decide this case by choosing between competing versions of events.  As recently stated in R. v. MacKenzie, 2020 ONCA 646 at para [22]       A jury cannot determine guilt simply by deciding which of two competing versions of the rele......
  • R. v. P.S., 2021 ONSC 1388
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 23 Febrero 2021
    ...must not, and does not, decide this case by choosing between competing versions of events.  As recently stated in R. v. MacKenzie, 2020 ONCA 646 at para [22]       A jury cannot determine guilt simply by deciding which of two competing versions of the rele......
  • R. v. Ignacio,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 3 Febrero 2021
    ...interpretation, in several cases following Bartholomew (see, for example, W.R.; R. v. Mirzadegan, 2019 ONCA 864; and R. v. MacKenzie, 2020 ONCA 6460F[1]), this court has confirmed that the trier of fact is entitled to consider the absence of evidence of motive to fabricate as one factor in ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • R. v. Taylor, 2021 NSSC 120
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 28 Abril 2021
    ...for example, W.R. ; R. v. Mirzadegan, 2019 ONCA 864 (Ont. C.A.) ; and R. v. MacKenzie, 2020 ONCA 646 (Ont. C.A.)1), this court has confirmed that the trier of fact is entitled to consider the absence of evidence of motive to fabricate as one factor in......
  • R. v. S.B.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 17 Diciembre 2021
    ...must not, and does not, decide this case by choosing between competing versions of events.  As recently stated in R. v. MacKenzie, 2020 ONCA 646 at para [22]       A jury cannot determine guilt simply by deciding which of two competing versions of the rele......
  • R. v. P.S., 2021 ONSC 1388
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 23 Febrero 2021
    ...must not, and does not, decide this case by choosing between competing versions of events.  As recently stated in R. v. MacKenzie, 2020 ONCA 646 at para [22]       A jury cannot determine guilt simply by deciding which of two competing versions of the rele......
  • R. v. Ignacio,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 3 Febrero 2021
    ...interpretation, in several cases following Bartholomew (see, for example, W.R.; R. v. Mirzadegan, 2019 ONCA 864; and R. v. MacKenzie, 2020 ONCA 6460F[1]), this court has confirmed that the trier of fact is entitled to consider the absence of evidence of motive to fabricate as one factor in ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT