R. v. Macki (C.F.), 2001 BCSC 427

JudgeRomilly, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateMarch 19, 2001
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2001 BCSC 427;[2001] B.C.T.C. 427 (SC)

R. v. Macki (C.F.), [2001] B.C.T.C. 427 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2001] B.C.T.C. TBEd. AP.033

Her Majesty the Queen v. Curtis Franz Macki

(CC000946; 2001 BCSC 427)

Indexed As: R. v. Macki (C.F.)

British Columbia Supreme Court

Vancouver

Romilly, J.

March 22, 2001.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Criminal Law - Topic 5670

Punishments (sentence) - Imprisonment and parole - Parole - Period of ineligibility - See paragraphs 1 to 65.

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Camphaug (1986), 28 C.C.C.(3d) 125 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 2].

R. v. Sinclair (1972), 6 C.C.C.(2d) 523 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 2].

R. v. Latimer (R.W.) (2001), 264 N.R. 99; 203 Sask.R. 1; 240 W.A.C. 1; 150 C.C.C.(3d) 129 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 22].

R. v. Wells (J.W.) (2000), 250 N.R. 364; 250 A.R. 273; 213 W.A.C. 273; 141 C.C.C.(3d) 368 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 23].

R. v. Shropshire (M.T.), [1995] 4 S.C.R. 227; 188 N.R. 284; 65 B.C.A.C. 37; 106 W.A.C. 37; 102 C.C.C.(3d) 193; 129 D.L.R.(4th) 657; 43 C.R.(4th) 269, refd to. [para. 28].

R. v. Doyle (1991), 108 N.S.R.(2d) 1; 294 A.P.R. 1 (C.A.), leave to appeal refused (1992), 139 N.R. 395; 112 N.S.R.(2d) 179; 307 A.P.R. 179 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 28].

R. v. Wenarchuk (1982), 15 Sask.R. 240; 67 C.C.C.(2d) 169 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 30].

R. v. Bertrand (D.) (1997), 91 B.C.A.C. 298; 148 W.A.C. 298 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 31].

R. v. Stewner (B.J.) (1996), 113 Man.R.(2d) 78; 131 W.A.C. 78 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 31].

R. v. Spanevello (P.F.) (1998), 115 B.C.A.C. 14; 189 W.A.C. 14 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 31].

R. v. Cruz (C.A.) (1997), 106 B.C.A.C. 184; 172 W.A.C. 184; 124 C.C.C.(3d) 157 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 31].

R. v. Michelle (B.E.) (1998), 119 B.C.A.C. 163; 194 W.A.C. 163 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 32].

R. v. McInnis (J.O.) (1999), 119 O.A.C. 316; 134 C.C.C.(3d) 515 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 32].

R. v. McKnight (R.) (1999), 119 O.A.C. 364; 135 C.C.C.(3d) 41 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 33].

R. v. Wristen (A.N.) (1999), 127 O.A.C. 314; 141 C.C.C.(3d) 1 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 33].

R. v. Lauzon (J.) (2000), 137 O.A.C. 153 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 33].

R. v. Truong (A.K.) (2000), 135 B.C.A.C. 316; 221 W.A.C. 316 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 34].

R. v. Mafi (K.) (2000), 133 B.C.A.C. 221; 217 W.A.C. 221; 142 C.C.C.(3d) 449 (C.A.), leave to appeal refused (2000), 263 N.R. 391; 151 B.C.A.C. 159; 249 W.A.C. 159 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 35].

R. v. Rushton (K.E.) (2000), 143 B.C.A.C. 295; 235 W.A.C. 295 (Yuk. C.A.), refd to. [para. 39].

R. v. Paterson (D.R.) (2001), 149 B.C.A.C. 56; 244 W.A.C. 56 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 42].

Eccles v. Bourque et al., [1975] 2 S.C.R. 739; 3 N.R. 259; 19 C.C.C.(2d) 129; 50 D.L.R.(3d) 753; 27 C.R.N.S. 325; [1975] 1 W.W.R. 209, refd to. [para. 46].

R. v. Genest, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 59; 91 N.R. 161; 19 Q.A.C. 163; 45 C.C.C.(3d) 385; 67 C.R.(3d) 224; 37 C.R.R. 252, refd to. [para. 46].

R. v. Colet, [1981] 1 S.C.R. 2; 35 N.R. 227; 57 C.C.C.(2d) 105; 119 D.L.R.(3d) 521, refd to. [para. 46].

R. v. Landry, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 145; 65 N.R. 161; 14 O.A.C. 241; 25 C.C.C.(3d) 1, refd to. [para. 46].

R. v. Gimson (1990), 37 O.A.C. 243; 54 C.C.C.(3d) 232 (C.A.), affd. [1991] 3 S.C.R. 692; 152 N.R. 161; 62 O.A.C. 282; 69 C.C.C.(3d) 552, refd to. [para. 46].

R. v. Feeney (M.), [1997] 2 S.C.R. 13; 212 N.R. 83; 91 B.C.A.C. 1; 148 W.A.C. 1; 115 C.C.C.(3d) 129, refd to. [para. 46].

R. v. Kokesch, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 3; 121 N.R. 161; 61 C.C.C.(3d) 207; 1 C.R.(4th) 62; [1991] 1 W.W.R. 193; 51 B.C.L.R.(2d) 157; 50 C.R.R. 285, refd to. [para. 47].

R. v. Grant (D.), [1993] 3 S.C.R. 223; 159 N.R. 161; 35 B.C.A.C. 1; 57 W.A.C. 1; 84 C.C.C.(3d) 173; 24 C.R.(4th) 1, refd to. [para. 48].

R. v. Maxwell (A.J.) (1999), 131 B.C.A.C. 52; 214 W.A.C. 52 (C.A.), leave to appeal refused (2001), 267 N.R. 394; 150 B.C.A.C. 318; 245 W.A.C. 318 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 49].

R. v. Fraser (S.A.) (1997), 158 N.S.R.(2d) 163; 466 A.P.R. 163 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 50].

R. v. Foster (R.J.) et al. (1997), 161 N.S.R.(2d) 371; 477 A.P.R. 371 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 50].

R. v. Stephenson (T.L.) (1998), 169 N.S.R.(2d) 159; 508 A.P.R. 159 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 50].

R. v. Harris (P.J.) (2000), 181 N.S.R.(2d) 211; 560 A.P.R. 211; 142 C.C.C.(3d) 252 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 50].

R. v. Matwiy (S.B.) and Langston (J.D.) (1996), 178 A.R. 356; 110 W.A.C. 356; 105 C.C.C.(3d) 251 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 50].

R. v. Dukeshire (T.A.) and Morrison (P.O.) (1999), 129 B.C.A.C. 157; 210 W.A.C. 157 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 50].

R. v. Harsch (L.H.) (1995), 55 B.C.A.C. 90; 90 W.A.C. 90 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 50].

R. v. Peters (J.F.) (1997), 92 B.C.A.C. 62; 150 W.A.C. 62 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 50].

R. v. Collicott (S.A.) (1998), 108 B.C.A.C. 19; 176 W.A.C. 19 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 50].

R. v. Rummelhoff, [1989] B.C.J. No. 88 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 50].

R. v. Schoenhalz (M.M.) (1999), 121 B.C.A.C. 138; 198 W.A.C. 138 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 50].

R. v. Kelley (K.) (1994), 47 B.C.A.C. 71; 76 W.A.C. 71 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 50].

R. v. Robert (K.) (1996), 77 B.C.A.C. 65; 126 W.A.C. 65 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 50].

R. v. Caziere (R.C.R.) (1998), 112 B.C.A.C. 312; 182 W.A.C. 312 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 50].

R. v. Hiltz (J.) (1998), 115 B.C.A.C. 315; 189 W.A.C. 315 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 50].

R. v. Johns (G.D.) (1999), 125 B.C.A.C. 298; 204 W.A.C. 298 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 50].

R. v. DeHaan, [1967] 3 All E.R. 618 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 53].

R. v. Saulnier (1987), 21 B.C.L.R.(2d) 232 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 53].

R. v. Sandercock (1985), 62 A.R. 382; 22 C.C.C.(3d) 79 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 53].

R. v. R.T. (1992), 58 O.A.C. 81; 17 C.R.(4th) 247 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 53].

MacMillan Bloedel Ltd. v. Brown et al. (1994), 44 B.C.A.C. 241; 71 W.A.C. 241; 88 C.C.C.(3d) 148 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 53].

R. v. Johnston and Tremayne, [1970] 4 C.C.C. 64 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 55].

R. v. Layte (1983), 38 C.R.(3d) 204 (Ont. Co. Ct.), refd to. [para. 55].

R. v. Patterson, [1998] O.J. No. 937 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 56].

R. v. Pitkeathly (D.B.) (1994), 69 O.A.C. 352; 29 C.R.(4th) 182 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 56].

R. v. Spiller, [1969] 4 C.C.C. 211 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 56].

R. v. Bruce (1982), 35 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 530; 99 A.P.R. 530; 28 C.R.(3d) 247 (P.E.I.C.A.), refd to. [para. 56].

R. v. Getty (1990), 104 A.R. 180 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 56].

R. v. Santos (J.) (1993), 67 O.A.C. 270 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 56].

Statutes Noticed:

Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, sect. 718.1 [para. 62]; sect. 718.2(b) [para. 63]; sect. 745.4 [para. 26].

Counsel:

A.R. Flanz, for the Crown;

G.S. Boothroyd and M. Gerwin, for the defendant.

This case was heard on March 19, 2001, before Romilly, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on March 22, 2001.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 practice notes
  • R. v. Cliff (J.M.), [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1177 (SC)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 4, 2011
    ...22 C.R. (3d) 396 (Que. S.C.); R. v. Butler , 2009 ABQB 218; R. v. Gordon , 2007 ABQB 329; R. v. Hawkins , 2011 NSCA 7; R. v. Macki , 2001 BCSC 427; R. v. McLaughlin , 2003 ABQB 338; R. v. Paterson , 2001 BCCA 11; and R. v. Van Osselaer , 2004 BCCA 3. [46] I have considered all of these case......
  • R. v. Elliott (W.G.R.), [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1435
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 13, 2014
    ...cases that involved aboriginal offenders, including R. v. Paul and Ipeelee , as well as R. v. Bishop , 2010 NUCJ 16; R. v. Macki , 2001 BCSC 427; R. v. Ashawasega , [1997] O.J. No. 625; R. v. Sipes (O'Donnell) , 2012 BCSC 2019; and R. v. Mafi , 2000 BCCA 135. In all of those cases, the......
  • R. v. Doucette (L.J.), (2015) 365 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 173 (PEICA)
    • Canada
    • March 24, 2015
    ...[para. 12]. R. v. Murray (B.J.), [2009] B.C.A.C. Uned. 87; 2009 BCCA 426, refd to. [para. 15]. R. v. Macki (C.F.), [2001] B.C.T.C. 427; 2001 BCSC 427, refd to. [para. R. v. Bruce (1982), 35 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 530; 99 A.P.R. 530 (P.E.I.C.A.), refd to. [para. 20]. R. v. Weiler (1991), 92 Nf......
  • R. v. Eli (T.S.), [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 926
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 25, 2015
    ...59). Mr. Forslund was 29 years of age at the time of that offence and parole ineligibility was set at 17 years. [47] In R. v. Macki , 2001 BCSC 427, the accused was a 32-year-old Aboriginal man from an extremely abusive home. He had had an unusually severe drug problem since he was 13. He e......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • R. v. Cliff (J.M.), [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1177 (SC)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 4, 2011
    ...22 C.R. (3d) 396 (Que. S.C.); R. v. Butler , 2009 ABQB 218; R. v. Gordon , 2007 ABQB 329; R. v. Hawkins , 2011 NSCA 7; R. v. Macki , 2001 BCSC 427; R. v. McLaughlin , 2003 ABQB 338; R. v. Paterson , 2001 BCCA 11; and R. v. Van Osselaer , 2004 BCCA 3. [46] I have considered all of these case......
  • R. v. Elliott (W.G.R.), [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1435
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 13, 2014
    ...cases that involved aboriginal offenders, including R. v. Paul and Ipeelee , as well as R. v. Bishop , 2010 NUCJ 16; R. v. Macki , 2001 BCSC 427; R. v. Ashawasega , [1997] O.J. No. 625; R. v. Sipes (O'Donnell) , 2012 BCSC 2019; and R. v. Mafi , 2000 BCCA 135. In all of those cases, the......
  • R. v. Doucette (L.J.), (2015) 365 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 173 (PEICA)
    • Canada
    • March 24, 2015
    ...[para. 12]. R. v. Murray (B.J.), [2009] B.C.A.C. Uned. 87; 2009 BCCA 426, refd to. [para. 15]. R. v. Macki (C.F.), [2001] B.C.T.C. 427; 2001 BCSC 427, refd to. [para. R. v. Bruce (1982), 35 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 530; 99 A.P.R. 530 (P.E.I.C.A.), refd to. [para. 20]. R. v. Weiler (1991), 92 Nf......
  • R. v. Eli (T.S.), [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 926
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 25, 2015
    ...59). Mr. Forslund was 29 years of age at the time of that offence and parole ineligibility was set at 17 years. [47] In R. v. Macki , 2001 BCSC 427, the accused was a 32-year-old Aboriginal man from an extremely abusive home. He had had an unusually severe drug problem since he was 13. He e......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT