R. v. Marr, 2019 NSSC 327

JudgeHonourable Justice Ann E. Smith
CourtSupreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
Case DateNovember 20, 2019
JurisdictionNova Scotia
Citations2019 NSSC 327
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • R. v. Marr, 2020 NSCA 30
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • March 23, 2020
    ...before the Honourable Justice Ann E. Smith, sitting as a Summary Conviction Appeal Court. Justice Smith allowed the appeal (R. v. Marr, 2019 NSSC 327). [5] Justice Smith [84] I therefore conclude that the trial judge erred in finding that this matter was sufficiently serious and complex tha......
  • R. v. Marr, 2021 NSCA 17
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • February 19, 2021
    ...E. Smith allowed the appeal, in essence because the Provincial Court judge erred in her application of the mandated analytical framework (2019 NSSC 327). [8]          Despite having the benefit of counsel before the Provincial Court and the SCAC,......
  • R v. Nicholson, 2020 NSSC 179
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • June 5, 2020
    ...flaws in the Crown’s position. [10]      The Crown submits that, given the outcome in R. v. Marr, 2019 NSSC 327, (“Marr (Rowbotham summary appeal)”), it is clear that the application judge in the case at hand erred. The summary conviction appeal......
3 cases
  • R. v. Marr, 2020 NSCA 30
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • March 23, 2020
    ...before the Honourable Justice Ann E. Smith, sitting as a Summary Conviction Appeal Court. Justice Smith allowed the appeal (R. v. Marr, 2019 NSSC 327). [5] Justice Smith [84] I therefore conclude that the trial judge erred in finding that this matter was sufficiently serious and complex tha......
  • R. v. Marr, 2021 NSCA 17
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • February 19, 2021
    ...E. Smith allowed the appeal, in essence because the Provincial Court judge erred in her application of the mandated analytical framework (2019 NSSC 327). [8]          Despite having the benefit of counsel before the Provincial Court and the SCAC,......
  • R v. Nicholson, 2020 NSSC 179
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • June 5, 2020
    ...flaws in the Crown’s position. [10]      The Crown submits that, given the outcome in R. v. Marr, 2019 NSSC 327, (“Marr (Rowbotham summary appeal)”), it is clear that the application judge in the case at hand erred. The summary conviction appeal......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT