R. v. McMillan (J.), 2016 YKCA 10
| Jurisdiction | Yukon |
| Judge | Frankel, Stromberg-Stein and Dickson, JJ.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Yukon Territory) |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,NARCOTIC CONTROL |
| Citation | 2016 YKCA 10 |
| Date | 26 August 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Table of cases
...OJ No 2941 ........... 538 R v McMahon, 2018 SKCA 26, 361 CCC (3d) 429 ........................................ 27, 121 R v McMillan, 2016 YKCA 10, [2016] YJ No 87 ................................................. 495 R v McNabb (1971), 4 CCC (2d) 316, [1971] SJ No 255 (CA) ......................
-
The Trial Process
...of technicalities was the only real mechanism open to courts to guard against unfairness, 64 R v Hirsch , 2017 SKCA 14. 65 R v McMillan , 2016 YKCA 10 at para 26. 66 Tim Quigley, Procedure in Canadian Criminal Law , 2d ed (Toronto: Thomson Carswell, 2005) (loose-leaf) at 17-2. CRIMINAL PROC......
-
R v Shilmar, 2017 ABPC 213
...v G.L.M., 1999 BCCA 467. The date of an offence is not generally viewed as an essential element of the offence. See, for eg. R v McMillan, 2016 YKCA 10. In any event, either of the counts so amended may be ‘divided’ or further amended on application by the accused. See: s.591(2) C.C. No suc......
-
R v Benz, 2017 ABPC 308
...occurrence nor the jurisdiction in which it occurred are essential elements of the offences on the facts of this case. See: R v McMillan, 2016 YKCA 10; R v Daley (2008), 2008 NBQB 21 (N.B.Q.B.).Facts[9] On March 19th, 2017 Bell was ......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
R v Shilmar, 2017 ABPC 213
...v G.L.M., 1999 BCCA 467. The date of an offence is not generally viewed as an essential element of the offence. See, for eg. R v McMillan, 2016 YKCA 10. In any event, either of the counts so amended may be ‘divided’ or further amended on application by the accused. See: s.591(2) C.C. No suc......
-
R v Benz, 2017 ABPC 308
...occurrence nor the jurisdiction in which it occurred are essential elements of the offences on the facts of this case. See: R v McMillan, 2016 YKCA 10; R v Daley (2008), 2008 NBQB 21 (N.B.Q.B.).Facts[9] On March 19th, 2017 Bell was ......
-
R v Smith,
...(para. 11). In this case the amendment is of the date of the offence. [40] In R v McMillan, 2016 YKCA 10 at para. 23, the court wrote: …The “golden rule” for determining whether a count is factually sufficient is that the accused must......
-
R v Buffalo, 2017 ABPC 290
...November 1, 2016. Though the date of an offence may not constitute an essential element of a criminal offence (see: R v McMillan, 2016 YKCA 10), it may assume that status in cases where the prosecution relies upon a presumption in order to prove the accused’s blood/alcohol concentration at ......
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...OJ No 2941 ........... 538 R v McMahon, 2018 SKCA 26, 361 CCC (3d) 429 ........................................ 27, 121 R v McMillan, 2016 YKCA 10, [2016] YJ No 87 ................................................. 495 R v McNabb (1971), 4 CCC (2d) 316, [1971] SJ No 255 (CA) ......................
-
The Trial Process
...of technicalities was the only real mechanism open to courts to guard against unfairness, 64 R v Hirsch , 2017 SKCA 14. 65 R v McMillan , 2016 YKCA 10 at para 26. 66 Tim Quigley, Procedure in Canadian Criminal Law , 2d ed (Toronto: Thomson Carswell, 2005) (loose-leaf) at 17-2. CRIMINAL PROC......