R. v. McNab, 2019 SKQB 234
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | KLATT J. |
| Citation | 2019 SKQB 234 |
| Date | 09 September 2019 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Docket Number | CRM 55 of 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
R. v. Hotomanie,
...and impose a total sentence of 6 years. There is certainly some case law to support that view. For example, in R v McNab, 2019 SKQB 234, Madame Justice Klatt sentenced a serial driving offender. She considered the Gladue factors, but determined that those factors did not r......
-
R. v. Hotomanie,
...the primary focus of the court in such decisions must be denunciation and deterrence. Counsel particularly focused upon R v McNab, 2019 SKQB 234 and R v Desjarlais, 2011 SKPC 41. He said that both of these cases bore considerable similarities to the case at bar. He said th......
-
R. v. Tawiyaka,
...in the community; [44] The Crown next relied on the case of R v McNab, 2019 SKQB 234 [McNab]. Mr. McNab received a sentence of 2 years’ incarceration followed by 1 year of probation. This case too is distinguish......
3 cases
-
R. v. Hotomanie,
...and impose a total sentence of 6 years. There is certainly some case law to support that view. For example, in R v McNab, 2019 SKQB 234, Madame Justice Klatt sentenced a serial driving offender. She considered the Gladue factors, but determined that those factors did not r......
-
R. v. Hotomanie,
...the primary focus of the court in such decisions must be denunciation and deterrence. Counsel particularly focused upon R v McNab, 2019 SKQB 234 and R v Desjarlais, 2011 SKPC 41. He said that both of these cases bore considerable similarities to the case at bar. He said th......
-
R. v. Tawiyaka,
...in the community; [44] The Crown next relied on the case of R v McNab, 2019 SKQB 234 [McNab]. Mr. McNab received a sentence of 2 years’ incarceration followed by 1 year of probation. This case too is distinguish......