R. v. Mentuck
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, Beverley; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C.; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; Arbour, Louise; LeBel, Louis |
| Citation | 2001 SCC 76,[2001] 3 SCR 442,[2001] SCJ No 73 (QL),277 NR 160,[2002] 2 WWR 409,47 CR (5th) 63,205 DLR (4th) 512,158 CCC (3d) 449,269 WAC 1,JE 2001-2142,AZ-50104926,[2001] CarswellMan 535,163 Man R (2d) 1,51 WCB (2d) 349 |
| Docket Number | 27738 |
| Date | 15 November 2001 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
491 practice notes
-
Canadian Broadcasting Corp. et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al.
... ... Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. Dagenais et al ... , [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835; 175 N.R. 1; 76 O.A.C. 81, and ... R. v. Mentuck (C.G.) ... , [2001] 3 S.C.R. 442; 277 N.R. 160; 163 Man.R.(2d) 1; 269 W.A.C. 1; 2001 SCC 76 (" ... Dagenais ... "). What would be required is a level of proof higher than that of a rational connection required by the test from ... R. v. Oakes ... , [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103; 65 N.R. 87; 14 ... ...
-
R. v. T.W.W.
...Scotia v. MacIntyre, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 175; Dagenais v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp., [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835; R. v. Mentuck, 2001 SCC 76, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 442; R. v. Davies, 2022 BCCA 103, 412 C.C.C. (3d) 375; Canadian Newspapers Co. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1988] 2 S.C.R. 122; Fedeli v. Bro......
-
Robertson v. Edmonton (City) Police Service (#10), (2004) 362 A.R. 44 (QB)
...(Attorney General), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 480; 203 N.R. 169; 182 N.B.R.(2d) 81; 463 A.P.R. 81, refd to. [para. 195]. R. v. Mentuck (C.G.), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 442; 277 N.R. 160; 163 Man.R.(2d) 1; 269 W.A.C. 1; 2001 SCC 76, refd to. [para. Application Under Section 83.28 of the Criminal Code, Re (2004......
-
Vancouver Sun et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al.
...Broadcasting Corp. v. Dagenais et al., [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835 ; 175 N.R. 1 ; 76 O.A.C. 81 , refd to. [para. 34]. R. v. Mentuck (C.G.), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 442; 277 N.R. 160 ; 163 Man.R.(2d) 1 ; 269 W.A.C. 1 ; 2001 SCC 76 , refd to. [para. R. v. Oakes, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103 ; 65 N.R. 87 ; 1......
Get Started for Free
404 cases
-
Canadian Broadcasting Corp. et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al.
... ... Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. Dagenais et al ... , [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835; 175 N.R. 1; 76 O.A.C. 81, and ... R. v. Mentuck (C.G.) ... , [2001] 3 S.C.R. 442; 277 N.R. 160; 163 Man.R.(2d) 1; 269 W.A.C. 1; 2001 SCC 76 (" ... Dagenais ... "). What would be required is a level of proof higher than that of a rational connection required by the test from ... R. v. Oakes ... , [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103; 65 N.R. 87; 14 ... ...
-
R. v. T.W.W.
...Scotia v. MacIntyre, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 175; Dagenais v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp., [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835; R. v. Mentuck, 2001 SCC 76, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 442; R. v. Davies, 2022 BCCA 103, 412 C.C.C. (3d) 375; Canadian Newspapers Co. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1988] 2 S.C.R. 122; Fedeli v. Bro......
-
Robertson v. Edmonton (City) Police Service (#10), (2004) 362 A.R. 44 (QB)
...(Attorney General), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 480; 203 N.R. 169; 182 N.B.R.(2d) 81; 463 A.P.R. 81, refd to. [para. 195]. R. v. Mentuck (C.G.), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 442; 277 N.R. 160; 163 Man.R.(2d) 1; 269 W.A.C. 1; 2001 SCC 76, refd to. [para. Application Under Section 83.28 of the Criminal Code, Re (2004......
-
Vancouver Sun et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al.
...Broadcasting Corp. v. Dagenais et al., [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835 ; 175 N.R. 1 ; 76 O.A.C. 81 , refd to. [para. 34]. R. v. Mentuck (C.G.), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 442; 277 N.R. 160 ; 163 Man.R.(2d) 1 ; 269 W.A.C. 1 ; 2001 SCC 76 , refd to. [para. R. v. Oakes, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103 ; 65 N.R. 87 ; 1......
Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 6 10, 2019)
...and C. Cseh, for the respondents Keywords: Wills and Estates, Civil Procedure, Sealing Orders, Open Court Principle, R. v. Mentuck, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 442, Atomic Energy of Canada v. Sierra Club of Canada, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 522 FACTS: The appellant newspaper and reporter brought a motion to term......
-
Breaking The Seal: BCCA Recommends A Procedure For Media Challenges To Private Proceedings
...for when a publication ban is to be granted in Dagenais v. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, 1994 3 S.C.R. 835, and R. v. Mentuck, 2001 3 S.C.R. 442, known as the "Dagenais-Mentuck" 3. An amicus curiae (also known as a "friend of the court") is an individual or organization who is not a pa......
-
The Right To Privacy Versus The Right To Information From Administrative Tribunals
...should bear similar obligations and limitations. Dagenais v Canadian Broadcasting Corp., [1994] 3 SCR 835 ("Dagenais") and R v Mentuck, [2001] 3 SCR 442 Arguably the most significant decisions in the debate between privacy and open justice are the opinions of the Supreme Court of Canada in ......
84 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...O.A.C. 50, [1987] O.J. No. 392 (C.A.)............................................................................ 372 R. v. Mentuck, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 442, 158 C.C.C. (3d) 449, 2001 SCC 76 ............. 50 R. v. Meston (1975), 28 C.C.C. (2d) 497, 34 C.R.N.S. 323 (Ont. C.A.) .............. 158......
-
Preliminary Matters and Remedies
...114 [ Hart ]. 193 Among the many Mr. Big cases, see Hart , ibid ; R v Mack , 2014 SCC 58; R v Grandinetti , 2005 SCC 5; or R v Mentuck , [2001] 3 SCR 442. 194 Hart , above note 192 at paras 115–18. 195 Courts of Appeal have declined, post- Hart , to issue stays based on Mr. Big operations i......
-
Table of Cases
...73 Meltzer, R v , [1989] 1 SCR 1764, 49 CCC (3d) 453 ................................. 2 Mentuck, R v , 2001 SCC 76, [2001] 3 SCR 442 ................................... 127 Metin, R v , 2013 ONCA 21 .............................................. 8, 13, 115 Miller, R v , 1998 CanLII 5115, 1......
-
Table of Cases
...70–72, 77, 96, 230 –31 R. v. McClure, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 445, 195 D.L.R. (4th) 513, 2001 SCC 14 .........342, 346 R. v. Mentuck, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 442, 205 D.L.R. (4th) 512, 2001 SCC 76 .................................................................................. 303, 331–33, 336, 347 R. v.......
Get Started for Free