R. v. Mero,

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeThe Honourable Chief Justice Bauman,The Honourable Mr. Justice Harris,The Honourable Mr. Justice Butler
Neutral Citation2020 BCCA 331
Citation2020 BCCA 331
Docket NumberCA46205
Date26 November 2020
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • R. v. Vanjoff,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 1 d1 Novembro d1 2021
    ...to the need for, or the insufficiency of, a defence explanation constitutes a reversal of that burden of proof: see e.g., R. v. Mero, 2020 BCCA 331 at para. 45; R. v. D.T., 2020 MBCA 88 at [31]        Rather than have this Court embark on a functional......
  • R v Knauff,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 10 d5 Fevereiro d5 2023
    ...submission that Mr. Knauff's account was fanciful and utterly unbelievable. As is clear from authorities such as R. v. Mero, 2020 BCCA 331, R. v. Ali, 2009 BCCA 464 and R. v. Burns, 2012 BCCA 483, a trial judge does not err by conducting a credibility analysis in this Conclusion 26 For......
  • R v Richardson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 25 d3 Janeiro d3 2023
    ...separates reasonable doubt from speculation, and such an assessment can only be set aside on appeal where it is unreasonable: R. v. Mero, 2020 BCCA 331 at para. 48; Villaroman at para. 25 In assessing whether the appellant has established error by the trial judge, this Court must apply a fu......
3 cases
  • R. v. Vanjoff,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 1 d1 Novembro d1 2021
    ...to the need for, or the insufficiency of, a defence explanation constitutes a reversal of that burden of proof: see e.g., R. v. Mero, 2020 BCCA 331 at para. 45; R. v. D.T., 2020 MBCA 88 at [31]        Rather than have this Court embark on a functional......
  • R v Knauff,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 10 d5 Fevereiro d5 2023
    ...submission that Mr. Knauff's account was fanciful and utterly unbelievable. As is clear from authorities such as R. v. Mero, 2020 BCCA 331, R. v. Ali, 2009 BCCA 464 and R. v. Burns, 2012 BCCA 483, a trial judge does not err by conducting a credibility analysis in this Conclusion 26 For......
  • R v Richardson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 25 d3 Janeiro d3 2023
    ...separates reasonable doubt from speculation, and such an assessment can only be set aside on appeal where it is unreasonable: R. v. Mero, 2020 BCCA 331 at para. 48; Villaroman at para. 25 In assessing whether the appellant has established error by the trial judge, this Court must apply a fu......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT