R. v. Milne,

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHonourable Madam Justice Ker
Neutral Citation2020 BCSC 2101
Citation2020 BCSC 2101
Date03 December 2020
Docket Number27834-1
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • The Pains of Imprisonment in a Pandemic.
    • Canada
    • March 22, 2021
    ...134-36; R v McKibbin, 2020 BCCA 337 (where a custodial sentence was suspended in light of a serious respiratory disease); R v Milne, 2020 BCSC 2101 (where the judge drew from McKibbin that "the absence of concrete evidence of significant risk to an offender s physical health" from COV1D-19 ......
  • R. v. B.T.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 16, 2021
    ...the abuse of vulnerable persons. Although not in force at the time of B.T.’s offending, the principles apply: R. v. Milne, 2020 BCSC 2101 and R. v. C.C.C., 2021 BCSC 599 at para. [86]        Also relevant to this case is s. 718.3(7)(a) of the C......
  • R. v. Campbell, 2021 BCSC 323
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 5, 2021
    ...impact of COVID‑19 upon the sentence I impose here. Additionally, I note the recent comments of Madam Justice Ker in R. v. Milne, 2020 BCSC 2101 at para. 134 that in the absence of concrete evidence of a significant risk to an offender’s health, the fact of COVID‑19 is ......
  • R. v. Houle,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 20, 2022
    ...Hearns, [2020] O.J. No. 1648. That case and others were referred to in a decision of this Court by Madam Justice Ker in R. v. Milne, 2020 BCSC 2101. Ultimately, after having reviewed the authorities, Justice Ker said this at paragraph The import of McKibbin is that, in the absence of c......
3 cases
  • R. v. B.T.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 16, 2021
    ...the abuse of vulnerable persons. Although not in force at the time of B.T.’s offending, the principles apply: R. v. Milne, 2020 BCSC 2101 and R. v. C.C.C., 2021 BCSC 599 at para. [86]        Also relevant to this case is s. 718.3(7)(a) of the C......
  • R. v. Campbell, 2021 BCSC 323
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 5, 2021
    ...impact of COVID‑19 upon the sentence I impose here. Additionally, I note the recent comments of Madam Justice Ker in R. v. Milne, 2020 BCSC 2101 at para. 134 that in the absence of concrete evidence of a significant risk to an offender’s health, the fact of COVID‑19 is ......
  • R. v. Houle,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 20, 2022
    ...Hearns, [2020] O.J. No. 1648. That case and others were referred to in a decision of this Court by Madam Justice Ker in R. v. Milne, 2020 BCSC 2101. Ultimately, after having reviewed the authorities, Justice Ker said this at paragraph The import of McKibbin is that, in the absence of c......
1 books & journal articles
  • The Pains of Imprisonment in a Pandemic.
    • Canada
    • March 22, 2021
    ...134-36; R v McKibbin, 2020 BCCA 337 (where a custodial sentence was suspended in light of a serious respiratory disease); R v Milne, 2020 BCSC 2101 (where the judge drew from McKibbin that "the absence of concrete evidence of significant risk to an offender s physical health" from COV1D-19 ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT