R v Molnar, 2018 MBCA 61

JurisdictionManitoba
JudgeMadam Justice Freda M. Steel,Madam Justice Barbara M. Hamilton,Mr. Justice William J. Burnett
Citation2018 MBCA 61
Docket NumberAR17-30-08838
CourtCourt of Appeal (Manitoba)
Date22 May 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • R v Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 4 Febrero 2020
    ...27). [64] In practice, the line that separates reasonable suspicion from reasonable belief is not always easy to draw. In R v Molnar, 2018 MBCA 61 at paras 25–35, 363 CCC (3d) 350 [Molnar], the Court said the difference between reasonable suspicion and reasonable grounds to believe is a dif......
  • R v Santos,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 19 Abril 2022
    ...7). It does, however, require a strong connection between the accused and the offence under investigation (Chapman at para 66; R v Molnar, 2018 MBCA 61 at paras 28–29, 363 CCC (3d) 350). (d)           While an arrest based on a mistak......
  • R v Tummillo, 2018 MBCA 95
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • 4 Octubre 2018
    ...the “possibility of uncovering criminality and not a probability of doing so” (R v Chehil, 2013 SCC 49 at para 32; also see R v Molnar, 2018 MBCA 61 at paras [73] In my view, it was open to the trial judge to find that there was sufficient evidence for the officer to reasonably suspect that......
  • CFS Western Manitoba v. A.J.A., 2018 MBQB 187
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • 30 Noviembre 2018
    ...the difference between reasonable suspicion and reasonable grounds to believe was addressed by the Manitoba Court of Appeal in R v Molnar, 2018 MBCA 61 (at paras. 25 and (25) The difference between reasonable suspicion and reasonable grounds to believe has been described as the “degree of c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • R v Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 4 Febrero 2020
    ...27). [64] In practice, the line that separates reasonable suspicion from reasonable belief is not always easy to draw. In R v Molnar, 2018 MBCA 61 at paras 25–35, 363 CCC (3d) 350 [Molnar], the Court said the difference between reasonable suspicion and reasonable grounds to believe is a dif......
  • R v Santos,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 19 Abril 2022
    ...7). It does, however, require a strong connection between the accused and the offence under investigation (Chapman at para 66; R v Molnar, 2018 MBCA 61 at paras 28–29, 363 CCC (3d) 350). (d)           While an arrest based on a mistak......
  • R v Tummillo, 2018 MBCA 95
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • 4 Octubre 2018
    ...the “possibility of uncovering criminality and not a probability of doing so” (R v Chehil, 2013 SCC 49 at para 32; also see R v Molnar, 2018 MBCA 61 at paras [73] In my view, it was open to the trial judge to find that there was sufficient evidence for the officer to reasonably suspect that......
  • CFS Western Manitoba v. A.J.A., 2018 MBQB 187
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • 30 Noviembre 2018
    ...the difference between reasonable suspicion and reasonable grounds to believe was addressed by the Manitoba Court of Appeal in R v Molnar, 2018 MBCA 61 (at paras. 25 and (25) The difference between reasonable suspicion and reasonable grounds to believe has been described as the “degree of c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT