R. v. Morales (R.); Use of Presentence Reports in Sentencing, Re (Comment), (1998) 126 Man.R.(2d) 159

• Court: Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
• Case Date: May 04, 1998
• Jurisdiction: Ontario
• Citations: (1998), 126 Man.R.(2d) 159

R. v. Morales (R.) (Comment) (1998), 126 Man.R.(2d) 159;

    167 W.A.C. 159

MLB case comment

CASE COMMENT

R. v. Morales (R.) (1998), 126 Man.R.(2d) 46; 167 W.A.C. 46 (C.A.): Use of Presentence Reports in Sentencing

Indexed As: R. v. Morales (R.); Use of Presentence Reports in Sentencing, Re (Comment)

Ontario Court of Justice

Provincial Division

Renaud, P.D.J.

May 4, 1998.

Summary:

This case comment contains no summary.

Criminal Law - Topic 5720.3

Punishments (sentence) - Conditional sentence - Considerations - A commenta­tor set out thematic guidelines that have been arti­culated by the Manitoba Court of Appeal respecting the need for and the contents of presentence reports - The com­mentator suggested that presentence reports should be ordered in all but the exceptional cases in which a conditional sentence was being considered - The commentator fur­ther stated that the themes served to illus­trate the various appropriate functions of presentence reports.

Criminal Law - Topic 5812

Punishments (sentence) - Sentencing pro­cedure and rights of accused - Use of presentence reports - [See Criminal Law - Topic 5720.3 ].

Criminal Law - Topic 5843

Sentencing - Considerations on imposing sentence - Content of a presentence report - [See Criminal Law - Topic 5720.3 ].

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Adam (K.L.) (1994), 92 Man.R.(2d) 115; 61 W.A.C. 115 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 4].

R. v. Duck, [1989] M.J. No. 325 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 4].

R. v. Anguish (D.J.) (1992), 81 Man.R.(2d) 155; 30 W.A.C. 155 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 5].

R. v. Cameron (1991), 75 Man.R.(2d) 290; 6 W.A.C. 290 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 6].

R. v. Gareau, [1989] M.J. No. 195 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 6].

R. v. Hannah, [1989] M.J. No. 157 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 6].

R. v. Lepine, [1986] M.J. No. 188 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 6].

R. v. Myran (K.R.) (1995), 107 Man.R.(2d) 241; 109 W.A.C. 241 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 7].

R. v. T.F.G. (1996), 110 Man.R.(2d) 14; 118 W.A.C. 14 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 8].

R. v. C.I.W., [1989] M.J. No. 449 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 8].

R. v. Beyer (J.A.) (1997), 118 Man.R.(2d) 103; 149 W.A.C. 103 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 9].

R. v. Athwal (1990), 68 Man.R.(2d) 213 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 9].

R. v. Bartsch (1991), 72 Man.R.(2d) 78 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 10].

R. v. C.C.P., [1995] M.J. No. 596 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 10].

R. v. Doerksen (1990), 62 Man.R.(2d) 259 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 11].

R. v. Beaulieu (H.A.W.) (1997), 118 Man.R.(2d) 148; 149 W.A.C. 148 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 11].

R. v. Beaumont (J.P.) and Trizpit (C.T.) (1996), 113 Man.R.(2d) 122; 131 W.A.C. 122 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 12].

R. v. Bourassa (J.) (1994), 92 Man.R.(2d) 288; 61 W.A.C. 288 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 12].

R. v. Blackbird (A.S.) (1993), 88 Man.R.(2d) 31; 51 W.A.C. 31 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 14].

R. v. T.A.G. (1996), 110 Man.R.(2d) 17; 118 W.A.C. 17 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 15].

R. v. Desmarais, [1991] M.J. No. 647 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 16].

R. v. Fletcher (1989), 57 Man.R.(2d) 218 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 17].

R. v. N.M.H. (1994), 92 Man.R.(2d) 300; 61 W.A.C. 300 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 17].

R. v. Noel, [1989] M.J. No. 143 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 18].

R. v. Bunn (T.A.) (1997), 118 Man.R.(2d) 300; 149 W.A.C. 300 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 19].

R. v. Burke, [1989] M.J. No. 226 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 20].

R. v. Harris (M.W.) (1993), 88 Man.R.(2d) 157; 51 W.A.C. 157 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 22].

R. v. M.R.S. (1991), 73 Man.R.(2d) 125; 3 W.A.C. 125 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 24].

R. v. Campbell, [1997] M.J. No. 652 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 25].

R. v. McKinney, [1988] M.J. No. 505 (C.A.), refd to. 25].

R. v. King, (1990), 66 Man.R.(2d) 130 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 27].

R. v. D.A.B., [1989] M.J. No. 312 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 28].

R. v. D.A.C., [1997] 118 Man.R.(2d) 288; 149 W.A.C. 288 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 29].

R. v. Doerksen, [1989] M.J. No. 92 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 30].

R. v. F.C.G. (1997), 118 Man.R.(2d) 132; 149 W.A.C. 132 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 31].

R. v. Emes (1990), 63 Man.R.(2d) 282 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 32].

R. v. Gutoski (1990), 63 Man.R.(2d) 246 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 32].

R. v. Kaushal (1991), 75 Man.R.(2d) 233; 6 W.A.C. 233 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 32].

V.K. Estate v. Hogue, [1993] M.J. No. 218 (Q.B. Master), refd to. [para. 33].

R. v. MacDougall (B.A.) (1995), 107 Man.R.(2d) 236; 109 W.A.C. 236 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 35].

R. v. Mananghaya (C.) (1997), 118 Man.R.(2d) 30; 149 W.A.C. 30 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 35].

R. v. Galaugher (K.W.) (1996), 110 Man.R.(2d) 145; 118 W.A.C. 145 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 37].

R. v. Reid (D.C.) (1993), 88 Man.R.(2d) 113; 51 W.A.C. 113 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 32].

R. v. Gray, [1989] M.J. No. 131 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 38].

R. v. Hannibal (P.R.) (1994), 95 Man.R.(2d) 42; 70 W.A.C. 42 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 40].

R. v. Hicks (K.T.) (1995), 95 Man.R.(2d) 295; 70 W.A.C. 295 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 41].

R. v. Hillhouse, [1989] M.J. No. 591 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 41].

R. v. Jenks (S.E.) (1997), 115 Man.R.(2d) 112; 139 W.A.C. 112 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 41].

R. v. Young, [1987] M.J. No. 6 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 41].

R. v. M.J.R. (1995), 100 Man.R.(2d) 193; 91 W.A.C. 193 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 41].

R. v. Kotaska (S.A.) (1993), 88 Man.R.(2d) 141; 51 W.A.C. 141 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 41].

R. v. Kaczmarek, [1987] M.J. No. 78 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 42].

R. v. J.M.C. (1994), 92 Man.R.(2d) 316; 61 W.A.C. 316 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 45].

R. v. Miller, [1986] M.J. No. 191 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 49].

R. v. Roberts (G.) (1993), 88 Man.R.(2d) 4; 51 W.A.C. 4 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 50].

R. v. Rose (M.S.) (1992), 78 Man.R.(2d) 314; 16 W.A.C. 314 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 51].

R. v. S.J.M., [1995] M.J. No. 514 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 51].

R. v. Vo (1992), 78 Man.R.(2d) 92; 16 W.A.C. 92 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 51].

R. v. J.S. (1986), 39 Man.R.(2d) 234 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 53].

R. v. Braun (C.D.) (1994), 97 Man.R.(2d) 172; 79 W.A.C. 172 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 55].

Counsel:

This is a case comment, therefore contains no counsel.

This case comment by Renaud, P.D.J., of the Ontario Court of Justice, Provincial Division, was submitted on May 4, 1998.