R. v. Morrison (A.K.),

JurisdictionYukon
JudgeFinch, C.J.B.C., Donald and Low, JJ.A.
Neutral Citation2002 YKCA 15
Subject MatterTRIALS
Citation(2002), 172 B.C.A.C. 232 (YukCA),2002 YKCA 15,172 BCAC 232,(2002), 172 BCAC 232 (YukCA),172 B.C.A.C. 232
Date11 June 2002
CourtCourt of Appeal (Yukon Territory)

R. v. Morrison (A.K.) (2002), 172 B.C.A.C. 232 (YukCA);

    282 W.A.C. 232

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2002] B.C.A.C. TBEd. OC.040

Her Majesty The Queen (respondent) v. Adam K. Morrison (appellant)

(YU471; 2002 YKCA 15)

Indexed As: R. v. Morrison (A.K.)

Yukon Court of Appeal

Finch, C.J.B.C., Donald and Low, JJ.A.

September 4, 2002.

Summary:

The accused was convicted of the offence of careless driving, contrary to s. 179 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The accused appealed.

The Yukon Supreme Court dismissed the appeal. The accused applied for leave to appeal.

The Yukon Court of Appeal dismissed the application.

Trials - Topic 1166

Summary convictions - Strict liability offences - Elements of - The Yukon Court of Appeal held that a strict liability offence did not require proof of an addi­tional element of blameworthiness or higher degree of culpability - All that was required was proof that the person charged with the strict liability offence did the pro­hibited act, and thereby breached the stan­dard of conduct required by the section of the enactment that created the offence - See paragraph 11.

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Beauchamp, [1953] O.R. 422 (C.A.), not appld. [para. 6].

R. v. Jacobsen, [1965] 1 C.C.C. 99 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 7].

O'Grady v. Sparling, [1960] S.C.R. 804, refd to. [para. 7].

R. v. McIver, [1965] 2 O.R. 475 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 8].

R. v. Sault Ste. Marie (City), [1978] 2 S.C.R. 1299; 21 N.R. 295; 85 D.L.R.(3d) 161; 40 C.C.C.(2d) 353; 3 C.R.(3d) 30; 7 C.E.L.R. 53, refd to. [para. 10].

Counsel:

M.W. Cozens, for the appellant;

Z. Brown, for the respondent.

This application was heard before Finch, C.J.B.C., Donald and Low, JJ.A., of the Yukon Court of Appeal, at Whitehorse, Yukon Territory, on June 11, 2002. The decision of the court was delivered in Vancouver, British Columbia, on Sep­tember 4, 2002, by Low, J.A.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 practice notes
  • R. v. Emery (R.D.), [2015] A.R. TBEd. NO.018
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 18, 2015
    ...(Alta QB). The requirement for an element of blameworthiness has been questioned and rejected by the Yukon Court of Appeal: R v Morrison , 2002 YKCA 15 at para 11, 172 BCAC 232. In that case, the panel considered as the sole point on appeal whether or not the trial judge was required to con......
  • R. v. Loray (J.S.), [2003] B.C.T.C. 806 (SC)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 25, 2003
    ...[1991] 1 S.C.R. 742; 122 N.R. 277; 46 O.A.C. 352; 63 C.C.C.(3d) 397; 3 C.R.(4th) 302, refd to. [para. 7]. R. v. Morrison (A.K.) (2002), 172 B.C.A.C. 232; 282 W.A.C. 232 (Yuk. C.A.), refd to. [para. 9]. R. v. McIver, [1965] 2 O.R. 475 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 10]. R. v. Sault Ste. Marie (City......
  • R v Mooney,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • April 28, 2023
    ...does not require “a breach of duty to the public . . . deserving of punishment.” This is succinctly stated in R v Morrison, 2002 YKCA 15, para 11, 172 BCAC A strict liability offence does not require proof of an additional element of blameworthiness or higher degree of culpabi......
  • R v Mooney,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • April 28, 2023
    ...not require “a breach of duty to the public … deserving of punishment.” This is succinctly stated in R v Morrison, 2002 YKCA 15, para 11, 172 BCAC 232: A strict liability offence does not require proof of an additional element of blameworthiness or higher degree of culp......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • R. v. Emery (R.D.), [2015] A.R. TBEd. NO.018
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 18, 2015
    ...(Alta QB). The requirement for an element of blameworthiness has been questioned and rejected by the Yukon Court of Appeal: R v Morrison , 2002 YKCA 15 at para 11, 172 BCAC 232. In that case, the panel considered as the sole point on appeal whether or not the trial judge was required to con......
  • R. v. Loray (J.S.), [2003] B.C.T.C. 806 (SC)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 25, 2003
    ...[1991] 1 S.C.R. 742; 122 N.R. 277; 46 O.A.C. 352; 63 C.C.C.(3d) 397; 3 C.R.(4th) 302, refd to. [para. 7]. R. v. Morrison (A.K.) (2002), 172 B.C.A.C. 232; 282 W.A.C. 232 (Yuk. C.A.), refd to. [para. 9]. R. v. McIver, [1965] 2 O.R. 475 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 10]. R. v. Sault Ste. Marie (City......
  • R v Mooney,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • April 28, 2023
    ...does not require “a breach of duty to the public . . . deserving of punishment.” This is succinctly stated in R v Morrison, 2002 YKCA 15, para 11, 172 BCAC A strict liability offence does not require proof of an additional element of blameworthiness or higher degree of culpabi......
  • R v Mooney,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • April 28, 2023
    ...not require “a breach of duty to the public … deserving of punishment.” This is succinctly stated in R v Morrison, 2002 YKCA 15, para 11, 172 BCAC 232: A strict liability offence does not require proof of an additional element of blameworthiness or higher degree of culp......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT