R. v. Murphy, Ex parte Bernard Jean, New Brunswick (Attorney General), (1969) 1 N.B.R.(2d) 297 (CA)
Judge | Bridges, C.J.N.B., Ritchie and Limerick, JJ.A. |
Court | Court of Appeal (New Brunswick) |
Case Date | March 12, 1969 |
Jurisdiction | New Brunswick |
Citations | (1969), 1 N.B.R.(2d) 297 (CA) |
R. v. Murphy (1969), 1 N.B.R.(2d) 297 (CA);
1 R.N.-B.(2e) 297
MLB headnote and full text
Sommaire et texte intégral
R. v. Murphy, Ex parte Bernard Jean, Attorney General of New Brunswick
Indexed As: R. v. Murphy, Ex parte Bernard Jean, New Brunswick (Attorney General)
Répertorié: R. v. Murphy, Ex parte Bernard Jean, New Brunswick (Attorney General)
New Brunswick Court of Appeal
Bridges, C.J.N.B., Ritchie and Limerick, JJ.A.
March 12, 1969.
Summary:
Résumé:
Application by Attorney General to have defendant committed for contempt of court (New Brunswick Court of Appeal).
Contempt - Topic 1107
What constitutes contempt - Publications - Contempt of court - Writing published calculated to bring a court or a judge of the court into contempt - Application for committal of defendant by Attorney General - Proof of intention (New Brunswick Court of Appeal).
Cases Noticed:
Ex parte Baird, In re Ellis (1888), 27 N.B.R. 99, also under R. v. Ellis (1889), 28 N.B.R. 497 refd.
In re Hawke (1888), 28 N.B.R. 391, also under R. v. Hawke (1889), 28 N.B.R. 400, refd.
McLeod v. St. Aubyn, [1899] A.C. 549 (P.C.), consd.
R. v. Gray, [1900] 2 Q.B. 36, folld.
R. v. New Statesman (Editor), Ex parte Director of Public Prosecutions (1958), 44 T.L.R. 301, appld.
Ambard v. Attorney General for Trinidad and Tobago, [1936] A.C. 322 (P.C.), appld.
Perera v. The Queen, [1951] A.C. 482 (P.C.), appld.
R. v. Solloway (1936), 67 C.C.C. 77, appld.
R. v. Western Printing & Publishing Ltd. (1954), 34 M.P.R. 129, appld.
Re R. v. Wallbridge, [1936] O.R. 482, dist.
R. v. Duffy et al., [1960] 2 All E.R. 891, dist.
In the matter of a Special Reference from the Bahama Islands, [1893] A.C. 138, dist.
Craig v. Harney (1947), 331 U.S. 367, dist.
R. v. Nicholls (1911), 12 C.L.R. 280 (Australia), dist.
R. v. Odham's Press Ltd., [1956] 3 All E.R. 494, appld.
R. v. Dolan, [1907] 2 I.R. 260, appld.
Adam v. Campbell, [1950] 3 D.L.R. 449, refd.
Counsel:
J.F.H. Teed, Q.C., and Hazen Strange, for the Crown;
David Nicholson, and Alan A. Borovoy (Of the Ontario Bar), for Murphy.
The judgment of the Court was delivered by Bridges, C.J.N.B.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
R. v. Kopyto, (1987) 24 O.A.C. 81 (CA)
...[1958] S.C.R. 41, refd to. [para. 105]. R. v. Glanzer et al., [1963] 1 C.C.C. 364 (Ont. H.C.), refd to. [para. 106]. R. v. Murphy (1969), 1 N.B.R.(2d) 297; 4 D.L.R.(3d) 289 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Re Borowski (1971), 3 C.C.C.(2d) 402 (Man. Q.B.), refd to. [para. 107]. Re Ouellet (Nos. 1 and......
-
R. v. Wellwood (K.H.) et al., [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 689
...before judicial discretion can be exercised may be considered in light of what sort of evidence may be needed. [60] In R. v. Murphy (1969), 1 N.B.R. (2d) 297 (C.A.), the court said at para. 21: Counsel for the defendant endeavoured to have two sociologists, Dr. Lyn MacDonald and Dr. Frank J......
-
R. v. Kopyto, (1987) 24 O.A.C. 81 (CA)
...[1958] S.C.R. 41, refd to. [para. 105]. R. v. Glanzer et al., [1963] 1 C.C.C. 364 (Ont. H.C.), refd to. [para. 106]. R. v. Murphy (1969), 1 N.B.R.(2d) 297; 4 D.L.R.(3d) 289 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Re Borowski (1971), 3 C.C.C.(2d) 402 (Man. Q.B.), refd to. [para. 107]. Re Ouellet (Nos. 1 and......
-
R. v. Wellwood (K.H.) et al., [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 689
...before judicial discretion can be exercised may be considered in light of what sort of evidence may be needed. [60] In R. v. Murphy (1969), 1 N.B.R. (2d) 297 (C.A.), the court said at para. 21: Counsel for the defendant endeavoured to have two sociologists, Dr. Lyn MacDonald and Dr. Frank J......