R v Napope,
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Barrington-Foote,Ottenbreit,Tholl |
| Citation | 2022 SKCA 61 |
| Date | 18 May 2022 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Docket Number | CACR3050 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R v Taylor,
...judge of the facts, has a very wide latitude in its assessment of the evidence” (Pittiman at para 7): see also R v Napope, 2022 SKCA 61. [94] At root, an appellant must establish that the verdicts are actually inconsist......
-
R v Taylor,
...sole judge of the facts, has a very wide latitude in its assessment of the evidence” ( Pittiman at para 7): see also R v Napope, 2022 SKCA 61. 94 At root, an appellant must establish that the verdicts are actually inconsistent. As the Supreme Court reiterated in Pittiman, the task of......
2 cases
-
R v Taylor,
...judge of the facts, has a very wide latitude in its assessment of the evidence” (Pittiman at para 7): see also R v Napope, 2022 SKCA 61. [94] At root, an appellant must establish that the verdicts are actually inconsist......
-
R v Taylor,
...sole judge of the facts, has a very wide latitude in its assessment of the evidence” ( Pittiman at para 7): see also R v Napope, 2022 SKCA 61. 94 At root, an appellant must establish that the verdicts are actually inconsistent. As the Supreme Court reiterated in Pittiman, the task of......