R. v. National Post et al., [2002] O.T.C. 961 (SC)
Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
Case Date | November 14, 2002 |
Jurisdiction | Ontario |
Citations | [2002] O.T.C. 961 (SC) |
R. v. Nat. Post, [2002] O.T.C. 961 (SC)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2002] O.T.C. TBEd. DE.033
Her Majesty the Queen (respondent) v. The National Post, Kenneth Whyte and Andrew McIntosh (applicants) and Bell Globemedia Publishing Inc., carrying on business as the Globe and Mail (applicant/intervenor) and Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (applicant/intervenor)
(Court File No. M86/02)
Indexed As: R. v. National Post et al.
Court of Ontario
Superior Court of Justice
Benotto, S.J.
December 6, 2002.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Criminal Law - Topic 3117
Special powers - Setting aside search warrants - General - Cross-examination of affiant - See paragraphs 1 to 14.
Cases Noticed:
R. v. Garofoli et al., [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1421; 116 N.R. 241; 43 O.A.C. 1; 36 Q.A.C. 161; 60 C.C.C.(3d) 161; 80 C.R.(3d) 317; 50 C.R.R. 206, refd to. [para. 7, footnote 1].
R. v. Dawson (E.F.), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 783; 203 N.R. 254; 155 N.S.R.(2d) 241; 457 A.P.R. 241; 123 C.C.C.(3d) 385, refd to. [para. 9, footnote 2].
Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. Dagenais et al., [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835; 175 N.R. 1; 76 O.A.C. 81; 94 C.C.C.(3d) 289; 25 C.R.R.(2d) 1; 120 D.L.R.(4th) 12, refd to. [para. 11, footnote 3].
R. v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp. et al. (2001), 142 O.A.C. 1; 52 O.R.(3d) 757 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 12, footnote 4].
Société Radio-Canada v. Nouveau-Brunswick (Procureur général) et autres, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 459; 130 N.R. 362; 119 N.B.R.(2d) 271; 300 A.P.R. 271; 85 D.L.R.(4th) 57; 67 C.C.C.(3d) 544, refd to. [para. 12, footnote 4].
Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. New Brunswick - see Société Radio-Canada v. Nouveau-Brunswick (Procureur général) et autres.
Counsel:
Scott Hutchison, for the respondent;
Marlys Edwardh and John Norris, for the applicant.
This application was heard on November 14, 2002, before Benotto, S.J., of the Ontario Superior Court, who released the following decision on December 6, 2002.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue reading
Request your trial