R v Neepin, 2020 MBCA 55

JurisdictionManitoba
JudgeMadam Justice Barbara M. Hamilton,Madam Justice Jennifer A. Pfuetzner,Madam Justice Karen I. Simonsen
Citation2020 MBCA 55
CourtCourt of Appeal (Manitoba)
Docket NumberAR19-30-09217
Date21 May 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R v Aalbers,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • September 27, 2022
    ...he continued “would be to ignore probative evidence of an offender’s mental state …”. Similarly, Neepin [2020 MBCA 55] held that it was an error in principle for the trial judge not to have considered the provocative circumstances in that case. [57] The Crown did......
  • TEN YEARS LATER AND LIMITED EVIDENCE OF PROGRESS: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF R VIPEELEE ON THE SENTENCING OF INDIGENOUS OFFENDERS CONVICTED OF MANSLAUGHTER.
    • Canada
    • University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review Vol. 81 No. 2, March 2023
    • March 22, 2023
    ...ONSC 1269. R v Masakayash, 2015 ONCJ 655. R v Nicholls, 2015 ONSC 8136. R v Wabason, 2016 ONSC 349. R v Brooks, 2012 ONCA 703. R v Neepin, 2020 MBCA 55. R v Belyk, 2021 MBQB R v Abraham, 2014 MBQB 242 (offender #1). R v Abraham, 2014 MBQB 242 (offender #2). R v Nepinak, 2017 MBPC 62 (offend......
  • R v T.J.H.,
    • Canada
    • September 26, 2022
    ...reasons that the sentencing judge assessed the impact of the Gladue factors on the appellant’s moral culpability. In R v Neepin, 2020 MBCA 55, the Manitoba Court of Appeal concluded at para As for the accused’s personal circumstances, the trial judge correctly stated that the ......
  • R. v. Younus,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 21, 2022
    ...An air of reality may arise on the accused’s evidence or may arise from a consideration of all the evidence: see e.g. R. v. Neepin, 2020 MBCA 55 at para. 17 and R. v. Angelis, 2013 ONCA 70 at paras. 32-33. If there is evidence upon which a jury acting reasonably could acquit if the e......
3 cases
  • R v Aalbers,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • September 27, 2022
    ...he continued “would be to ignore probative evidence of an offender’s mental state …”. Similarly, Neepin [2020 MBCA 55] held that it was an error in principle for the trial judge not to have considered the provocative circumstances in that case. [57] The Crown did......
  • R v T.J.H.,
    • Canada
    • September 26, 2022
    ...reasons that the sentencing judge assessed the impact of the Gladue factors on the appellant’s moral culpability. In R v Neepin, 2020 MBCA 55, the Manitoba Court of Appeal concluded at para As for the accused’s personal circumstances, the trial judge correctly stated that the ......
  • R. v. Younus,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 21, 2022
    ...An air of reality may arise on the accused’s evidence or may arise from a consideration of all the evidence: see e.g. R. v. Neepin, 2020 MBCA 55 at para. 17 and R. v. Angelis, 2013 ONCA 70 at paras. 32-33. If there is evidence upon which a jury acting reasonably could acquit if the e......
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT