R. v. Nepon, 2020 MBPC 48

Cited as2020 MBPC 48
CourtProvincial Court of Manitoba
Docket NumberMBPC
JudgeC.A. DEVINE, P.J.
JurisdictionManitoba
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • R. v. Hawes, 2021 ONCJ 40
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice
    • January 21, 2021
    ...of child pornography, with the learned sentencing judge specifically considering the decision in R. v. Friesen, supra, is R. v. Nepon, 2020 MBPC 48 (Man. Prov. Ct.). The sentencing principles to be applied remain constant; it is varying circumstances amongst the cases which cause differing ......
  • R v King, 2020 ABPC 219
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court (Alberta)
    • November 13, 2020
    ...of child pornography, with the learned sentencing judge specifically considering the decision in R. v. Friesen, supra, is R. v. Nepon, 2020 MBPC 48.  The sentencing principles to be applied remain constant; it is varying circumstances amongst the cases which cause differing sentencing outco......
2 cases
  • R. v. Hawes, 2021 ONCJ 40
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice
    • January 21, 2021
    ...of child pornography, with the learned sentencing judge specifically considering the decision in R. v. Friesen, supra, is R. v. Nepon, 2020 MBPC 48 (Man. Prov. Ct.). The sentencing principles to be applied remain constant; it is varying circumstances amongst the cases which cause differing ......
  • R v King, 2020 ABPC 219
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court (Alberta)
    • November 13, 2020
    ...of child pornography, with the learned sentencing judge specifically considering the decision in R. v. Friesen, supra, is R. v. Nepon, 2020 MBPC 48.  The sentencing principles to be applied remain constant; it is varying circumstances amongst the cases which cause differing sentencing outco......